EC Pharmacology And Toxicology

Review Article Volume 13 Issue 2 - 2025

The Mechanism of Action of Cyclophosphamide Points the Way for the Development of New Cyclophosphamide-Related Compounds

Georg Voelcker*

Institute of Biochemistry II, Goethe University Frankfurt Medical School, Frankfurt, Germany
*Corresponding Author: Georg Voelcker, Institute of Biochemistry II, Goethe University Frankfurt Medical School, Frankfurt, Germany.
Received: January 13, 2025; Published: January 29, 2025



The mechanism of action of cyclophosphamide (CP), although successfully used in the clinic for more than 60 years, was unknown until a few years ago. The reason for this was that results from in vitro studies were uncritically transferred to in vivo conditions. In vitro, the alkylating metabolite phosphoramide mustard (PAM) is formed by β-elimination of acrolein from the CP metabolite aldophosphamide (ALD); in vivo, ALD is cleaved by phosphodiesterase with the formation of 3-hydroxypropanal (HPA) instead of acrolein. Three discoveries had to come together to elucidate the mechanism of action of CP and other oxazaphosphorine cytostatic (OX): namely that HPA is a CP metabolite, that HPA promotes p53-controlled apoptosis and that the cell death event following CP therapy is p53-controlled apoptosis triggered by DNA damage. Based on this, a simple model for the mechanism of action of OX was postulated. Based on this model and with the aim of reduced toxicity and improved antitumor efficacy, aldophosphamide thiazolidines and aldophosphamide perhydrothiazines were synthesized and tested in P388 tumor bearing mice. The toxicity of these compounds is 6-7 times lower in mice than the toxicity of the parent compounds CP and Ifosfamide (IF). Therapy experiments with p388 tumor bearing mice were carried out with SUM-IAP. SUM-IAP is an I-aldophosphamide perhydrothiazolidine with an alkylating function adapted to the mechanism of action whereby antitumor activity is increased 104 to 105 times. Formation of metastases resistant to SUM-IAP is prevented by combining SUM-IAP with cis platinum (CPT) and by combination with the apoptosis enhancer N-methylformamide (NMF). With SUM-IAP, the body's own immune defense against metastases can be activated by suppressing inhibitory regulatory T cells. All animals were cured in a corresponding experiment. In contrast to aldophosphamide perhydrothiazines, aldophosphamide thiazolidines crosses the blood-brain barrier and are candidates for the treatment of CNS tumors.

 Keywords: Mechanism of Action of Cyclophosphamide; Thiazolidines/Perhydrothiazines of Aldophosphamide; Apoptosis; Blood Brain Barrier; SUM-IAP; Anti-Metastatic Therapy

  1. Compendium of Chemical Terminology, 2nd edition. (the "Gold Book"). Compiled by A. D. Mc Naught and A. Wilkinson. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford (1997). Online version (2019-) created by S. J. Chalk. ISBN 0-9678550-9-8.
  2. Meyer J and Weinmann JP. “Phosphamidase content of normal and pathologic issues of the oral cavity”. Journal of Histochemistry and Cytochemistry 5 (1953): 305-314.
  3. Arnold H., et al. “Chemotherapeutic action of a cyclic nitrogen mustard phosphamide ester (B 518-ASTA) in experimental tumours of the rat”. Nature 4613 (1958): 931.
  4. Brock N and Hohorst HJ. “Über die Aktivierung von Cyclophosphamid in vivo und in vitro”. Arzneimittelforschung (Drug Research) 13 (1963): 1021-1031.
  5. Voelcker G. “Enzyme catalyzed decomposition of 4-hydroxycyclophosphamide”. Open Conference Proceedings Journal 8 (2017): 44-51.
  6. Iyer C., et al. “Probiotic Lactobacillus reuteri promotes TNF-induced apoptosis in human myeloid leukemia-derived cells by modulation of NF-kappa B and MAPK signalling”. Cellular Microbiology 7 (2008): 1442-1452.
  7. Schwartz PS and Waxman DJ. “Cyclophosphamide induces caspase 9-dependent apoptosis in 9L tumor cells”. Molecular Pharmacology 6 (2001): 1268-1279.
  8. Peter G., et al. “Studies on 4-hydroperoxycyclophosphamide (NSC-181815): A simple preparation method and its application for the synthesis of a new class of “activated” sulfur-containing cyclophosphamide (NSC-26271) derivatives”. Cancer Treatment Reports4 (1976): 429-435.
  9. Voelcker G., et al. “Identification and pharmacokinetics of cyclophosphamide (NSC26271) metabolites in vivo”. Cancer Treatment Reports4 (1976): 415-422.
  10. Voelcker G., et al. “Studien zum Spontanzerfall von 4-Hydroxycyclophosphamid und 4-Hydroperoxycyclophosphamid mit Hilfe der Dünnschichtchromatographie”. Arzneimittelforschung (Drug Research) 24 (1974): 1172-1176.
  11. Kurowski V and Wagner T. “Urinary excretion of ifosfamide, 4-hydroxyifosfamide, 3- and 2-dechloroethylifosfamide, mesna, and dimesna in patients on fractionated intravenous ifosfamide and concomitant mesna therapy”. Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology 5 (1997): 431-439.
  12. Voelcker G., et al. “Evidence for enzymatic toxification of activated cyclophosphamide (4-hydroxycyclophosphamide)”. Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology 99A (1981): 58-59.
  13. Hohorst HJ., et al. “The enzymatic basis of cyclophosphamide specificity”. Advances in Enzyme Regulation 25 (1986): 99-122.
  14. Voelcker G and Haeglsperger R. “Pharmacokinetics of cyclophosphamide and cyclophosphamide metabolites in the mouse and their influence on the therapeutic effect of “activated” cyclophosphamide (4-hydroxycyclophosphamide) (author’s transl)”. Arzneimittelforschung6 (1982): 639-647.
  15. Voelcker G., et al. “Pharmacokinetics and Therapeutic Effects of Activated Cyclophosphamide (4-Hydroxycyclophosphamide G.B.A.)”. Bastert., et al. (eds): Thymusaplastic Nude Mice and Rats in Clinical Oncology Gustav Fischer Verlag, Stuttgart, New York (1981).
  16. Brock N. “Comparative pharmacologic study in vitro and in vivo with cyclophosphamide (NSC-26271), cyclophosphamide metabolites, and plain nitrogen mustard compounds”. Cancer Treatment Reports 4 (1976): 301-308.
  17. Brock N and Hohorst HJ. “The problem of specificity and selectivity of alkylating cytostatics: studies on N-2-chlorethylamido-oxazaophosphorines”. Zeitschrift für Krebsforschung 88 (1977): 185-215.
  18. Skinner R., et al. “Ifosfamide, mesna, and nephrotoxicity in children”. Journal of Clinical Oncology 1 (1993): 173-190.
  19. Voelcker G. “Causes and possibilities to circumvent cyclophosphamide toxicity”. Anti-Cancer Drugs6 (2020): 617-622.
  20. Giraud B., et al. “Oxazaphosphorines: new therapeutic strategies for an old class of drugs”. Expert Opinion on Drug Metabolism and Toxicology 8 (2010): 919-938.
  21. Voelcker G., et al. “Thiazolidinyl- and perhydrothiazinylphosphamidesters: toxicity and preliminary antitumor evaluation”. Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology 11-12 (1997): 623-6231.
  22. Voelcker G and Hohorst HJ. “Structure/activity studies with thiazolidinyl- and perhydrothiazinyl-phosphamid ester”. Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology 6 (1998): 297-300.
  23. Voelcker G., et al. “Increased antitumour activity of mesyl-I-aldophosphamide-perhydrothiazine, in vivo but not in vitro, compared to I-aldophosphamide-perhydrothiazine”. Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology 2 (2000): 74-78.
  24. Alexander P and Mikulski Z. “Differences in the response of leukaemia cells in tissue culture to nitrogen mustard and to dimethyl myleran”. Biochemical Pharmacology 5 (1961): 275-282.
  25. Povirk LF and Shuker DE. “DNA damage and mutagenesis induced by nitrogen mustards”. Mutation Research 3 (1994): 205-226.
  26. Iwamoto T., et al. “DNA intrastrand cross- at 5′-GA-3′ sequence formed by busulfan and its role in the cytotoxic effect”. Cancer Science 5 (2004): 454-458.
  27. Voelcker G. “Aldophosphamide-thiazolidine (NSC-613060) an oxazaphosphorine cytostatic that crosses the blood brain barrier”. Anticancer Drugs1 (2021): 61-65.
  28. Jungkamp W. “Aktive Anreicherung von Aldophosphamidthiazolidincarbonsäure in Tierischen Zellen Untersuchungen an Ehrlich-Ascitestumorzellen”. Inaugural-dissertation zur Erlangung des Doktorgrades der Zahnmedizin des Fachbereichs Humanmedizin der Johann Wolfgang Goethe Universität, Frankfurt am Main (1996).
  29. Sládek N E., et al. “Cellular levels of aldehyde dehydrogenases (ALDH1A1 and ALDH3A1) as predictors of therapeutic responses to cyclophosphamide-based chemotherapy of breast cancer: a retrospective study. Rational individualization of oxazaphosphorine-based cancer chemotherapeutic regimens”. Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology 4 (2002): 309-321.
  30. Voelcker G. “Mechanism-of-action based development of new Cyclophosphamides”. SynBio 2 (2023): 158-171.
  31. Voelcker G. “Enhancement of antitumor activity of the oxazaphosphorine cytostatic SUM-IAP by N-methylformamide”. Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology 6 (2016): 1183-1189.
  32. WHO Model List of Essential Medicines. Wikipedia.
  33. Pohl J., et al. “D-19575--a sugar-linked isophosphoramide mustard derivative exploiting transmembrane glucose transport”. Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology 5 (1995): 364-370.
  34. Kalyani D., et al. “Spectroscopic N-methylformamide with superoxide dismutase”. Spectrochimica Acta, Part A: Molecular and Biomolecular Spectroscopy 124 (2014): 148-152.
  35. Watanabe K., et al. “Sod1 loss induces intrinsic superoxide accumulation leading to p53-mediated growth arrest and apoptosis”. International Journal of Molecular Sciences 6 (2013): 10998-11010.
  36. Busch W. “Verhandlungen ärztlicher Gesellschaften”. Berliner Klinische Wochenschrift12 (1868): 137-138.
  37. Coley WB. “The treatment of malignant tumors by repeated inoculations of crysipelas, with a report of 10 original cases”. American Journal of the Medical Sciences 105 (1893): 488-511.
  38. Gross L. “Intradermal immunization of C3H mice against a sarcoma that originated in an animal of the same line”. Cancer Research 3 (1943): 326-333.
  39. Ghiringhelli F., et al. “Metronomic cyclophosphamide regimen selectively depletes CD4+CD25+ regulatory T cells and restores T and NK effector functions in end stage cancer patients”. Cancer Immunology, Immunotherapy 5 (2007): 641-648.
  40. Heylmann D., et al. “Human CD4+CD25+ regulatory T cells are sensitive to low dose cyclophosphamide: implications for the immune response”. PLoS One12 (2013): e83384.

Georg Voelcker. “The Mechanism of Action of Cyclophosphamide Points the Way for the Development of New Cyclophosphamide-Related Compounds”. ”. EC Pharmacology and Toxicology  13.2 (2025): 01-17.