EC Pharmacology And Toxicology

Case Report Volume 13 Issue 2 - 2025

Hypoxia and Giftedness: A Case Study with Genetic Analysis - Case Report

Fabiano de Abreu Agrela Rodrigues*, Elodia Avila and Claudia Patricia Simons Aparicio

Post-PhD in Neurosciences, Universidad Franz Tamayo, Brazil
*Corresponding Author: Fabiano de Abreu Agrela Rodrigues, Post-PhD in Neurosciences, Universidad Franz Tamayo, Brazil.
Received: January 28, 2025; Published: February 05, 2025



This case study explores the relationship between neonatal hypoxia and giftedness in a 59-year-old patient identified as Maria. Despite experiencing a brief oxygen deprivation at birth, Maria displayed exceptionally high cognitive abilities, evidenced by an IQ of 141. Genetic analysis revealed the presence of variants associated with brain development, such as those in the BDNF, COMT, ASTN2, and CDH8 genes, which influence synaptic plasticity and neuronal migration. However, these genetic predispositions alone do not fully explain Maria's high cognitive performance, suggesting the action of compensatory mechanisms and the significant influence of an enriching environment. Furthermore, the recent diagnosis of ADD raises questions about how these compensatory mechanisms operate and what limitations they may have. The study discusses the importance of integrating IQ test results with genetic and environmental factors to better understand the complex interaction between neonatal hypoxia, giftedness, and ADD.

 Keywords: Neonatal Hypoxia; Giftedness; Genetic Analysis; Brain Plasticity; ADD

  1. Bach-y-Rita P. “Theoretical aspects of sensory substitution and of neuroplasticity”. Brain Topography1 (2004): 17-28.
  2. Coleman LG., et al. “Neural compensation and plasticity: Cognitive resilience in aging and neurodegenerative diseases”. Neurobiology of Disease 134 (2020): 104703.
  3. Gaser C and Schlaug G. “Brain structures differ between musicians and non-musicians”. Journal of Neuroscience27 (2003): 9240-9245.
  4. Johnson S., et al. “Antecedents of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder symptoms in children born extremely preterm”. Journal of Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics4 (2016): 285-297.
  5. Johnston MV., et al. “Plasticity and injury in the developing brain”. Progress in Neurobiology5 (2009): 349-367.
  6. Martin N., et al. “Non-injurious neonatal hypoxia confers resistance to brain senescence in aged male rats”. PLoS ONE11 (2012): e48828.
  7. Martin N., et al. “Conditioning-like brief neonatal hypoxia improves cognitive function and brain tissue properties with marked gender dimorphism in adult rats”. Seminars in Perinatology3 (2010): 193-200.
  8. Meaney MJ. “Maternal care, gene expression, and the transmission of individual differences in stress reactivity across generations”. Annual Review of Neuroscience1 (2001): 1161-1192.
  9. Millar L., et al. “Neonatal hypoxia ischaemia: Mechanisms, models, and therapeutic challenges”. Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience 11 (2017): 78.
  10. Sistino J. “Attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder after neonatal surgery: review of the pathophysiology and risk factors”. Perfusion6 (2013): 484-494.

Fabiano de Abreu Agrela Rodrigues and Elodia Avila. “Hypoxia and Giftedness: A Case Study with Genetic Analysis - Case Report” ”. EC Pharmacology and Toxicology  13.2 (2025): 01-06.