EC Nutrition

Research Article Volume 19 Issue 1 - 2024

Evaluation of Heavy Metal Content of Canned Fishes and Selected Locally Consumed Fishes Sold in Nigerian Market

CU Ali1*, GTO Otitoju2 and O Otitoju3

1Department of Nutrition and Dietetics, University of Nigeria Nsukka, Enugu State, Nigeria

2Department Food Science and Technology, Federal University Wukari, Taraba State, Nigeria

3Department Food Science and Technology, Federal University Wukari, Taraba State, Nigeria

*Corresponding Author: CU Ali, Department of Nutrition and Dietetics, University of Nigeria Nsukka, Enugu State, Nigeria.
Received: November 27, 2023; Published: December 22, 2023



Fish is mostly consumed in many parts of the world by human population, as it provides nutrients of high biological value. Fish is a highly perishable commodity and that is why various processing methods are applied to safeguard it for use. Most of these processing methods can predispose fish to certain heavy metals that maybe detrimental to health and well-being of the human.

There are increased global reports on heavy metals contamination of food samples especially imported fish and this phenomenon has raised lots of concerns among nutritionists and health workers, and environmental toxicologist. Hence, the aim of this research work is to evaluate the quantities of heavy metals; Lead (Pb), Cadmium (Cd), Chromium (Cr), Mercury (Hg) and Arsenic (As) present in canned fishes and selected local fish samples in Nigeria. Heavy metals were determined using UNICAM 939 Atomic Absorption Spectrophotometer at different wavelengths. The results shows that cadmium content was generally low in all the samples ranging from 0.0024 - 0.0099 ppm while the local fishes showed the highest amount ranging from 0.0074 - 0.0099 ppm. Lead content ranged from 0.017 - 0.026 ppm. The local fish samples tend to have lower lead levels while the canned fishes had higher level of lead in their tissues. The result also shows that chromium content was generally high in all the samples ranging from 0.037 - 0.058 ppm while the selected fishes show the lowest amount ranging from 0.027 - 0.031 ppm. Mercury levels were present in some selected fishes ranging from 0.0037 - 0.0046 ppm while the canned ones had mercury level in the range of 0.0022 - 0.0039 ppm. The highest mercury level (0.0046 ± 0.01) was observed in sample 3, a locally consumed freshwater fish. The level of arsenic in all the samples ranged from 0.0079 - 0.015 ppm. Hazard quotient result shows that the HQ was less than 1 (< 1) generally for all the samples except for Cr level that was greater than 1 (> 1) in sample numbers 11 and 14 with HQ of 1.02 and 1.16 respectively. Therefore, the risk of exposure to majority of the tested samples shows that adverse effects are not likely to occur except for samples number 11 and 14. The levels of these heavy metals in the fish samples were below tolerable and permissible level which may not pose any harm to consumers. However, nutrition education will help to create awareness as well as protecting consumers against heavy metals bioaccumulation in the body.

 Keywords: Heavy Metals; Canned Fish; Hazard Quotient

  1. Anyanwu BO., et al. “Heavy metal mixture exposure and effects in developing nations: An updated”. Toxics 4 (2018): 65.
  2. Ashraf W., et al. “Levels of selected metals consumed in kingdom of Saudi Arabia”. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment1-3 (2006): 271-279.
  3. Ekhator OC., et al. “Safety evaluation of potential toxic metals exposure from street foods consumed in mid-west Nigeria”. Journal of Environmental and Public Health (2017): 8458057.
  4. FAO/WHO. Food Standard Programme Codex Committee on Contamination in Foods. FAO/WHO Beijing, China, 8 CX/CF07/1/6 (2007).
  5. The State of World Fisheries and Aquaculture. Food and Agriculture Organization Rome (2016): 200.
  6. Ghani A. “Effect of chromium toxicity on growth, chlorophyll and some mineral nutrients of Brassica juncea L”. Egyptian Academic Journal of Biological Sciences 1 (2011): 9-15.
  7. Gress L and Lord J. “Return and recycling and closed loop mercury control”. In mercury in product process, waste and the environmental; eliminating, reducing and managing risks from non-combustion sources (ed.oppelt, E. T) proceedings and summary report EPA /625/R-00/014 (2002).
  8. Ikem A and Egiebor N. “Assessment of trace elements in canned fishes (mackerel, tuna, salmon and herrngs) marketed in Georgia and Alabama (United States of America)”. Journal of Food Composition and Analysis8 (2005): 771-787.
  9. Ismail I and Saleh IM. “Analysis of heavy metals in water and fish (Tilapia ) samples from tasik mutiara, Puchong”. The Malaysian Journal of Analytical Sciences 16.3 (2012): 346-352.
  10. Jaishankar M., et al. “Biosorption of few heavy metal ions using agricultural wastes”. Journal of Environment Pollution and Human Health1 (2014): 1-6.
  11. Jan AT., et al. “Heavy metals and human health; Mechanistic insight into toxicity and counter defense system of antioxidants”. International Journal of Molecular Sciences 12 (2015): 29592-29630.
  12. Lidsky TI and Schneider JS. “Lead neurotoxicity in children: basic mechanisms and clinical correlates”. Brain1 (2003): 5-19.
  13. Mahurpawar M. “Effects of heavy metals on human health”. International Journal of Research-GRANTHAALAYAH 3 (2015): 1-7.
  14. Munoz-Olivia R and Camara C. “Speciation related to human health”. The Royal Society of Chemistry (2001): 331-353.
  15. Nsikak B., et al. “Mercury accumulation in fishes from tropical aquatic ecosystems in the Niger Delta, Nigeria”. Current Sciences6 (2007).
  16. Nussey G., et al. “Bioaccumulation of chromium, manganese, nickel and lead in the tissues of moggel, Labeo umbratus (Cyprinidae), from Withbank Dam, Mpumalanga”. Water SA2 (2006): 269-284.
  17. Otitoju O and Otitoju GTO. “Heavy metal concentrations in water, sediment and Periwinkle (Tympanotonus fuscastus) samples harvested from the Niger Delta region of Nigeria”. African Journal of Environmental Science and Technology5 (2013): 245-248.
  18. Pal J., et al. “A review on role of fish in human nutrition with special emphasis to essential fatty acid”. International Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Studies2 (2018): 427-430.
  19. Paul BT., et al. “Heavy metals toxicity and the environment”. Journal of National Institute of Health1-2 (2012): 126-133.
  20. Sim S., et al. “Evaluation of the acid digestion with different solvent combination for the determination of iron, zinc and lead in canned sardines”. Malaysian Journal of Chemistry1 (2006): 10-15.
  21. Sly PD., et al. “Health consequences of environmental exposures: causal thinking in global environmental epidemiology”. Annals of Global Health1 (2016): 3-9.
  22. Thompson LJ. “Lead”. In: Gupta RC, editor. Veterinary Toxicology. St. Louis, MO: Elsevier (2012): 522-526.
  23. “Arsenic” (2018).
  24. “Over 850,000 Nigerians in 12 States at risk of poisoning from mercury use” (2019).
  25. Wiener JC. Evolution of a contaminant problem; Mercury in freshwater fish. Proceedings and summary report USEPA/625/R-02/005 (2002).

CU Ali., et al. “Evaluation of Heavy Metal Content of Canned Fishes and Selected Locally Consumed Fishes Sold in Nigerian Market”. EC Nutrition  19.1 (2024): 01-08.