EC Nutrition

Research Article Volume 10 Issue 5 - 2017

A Comparison of Viscosity Classifications Between the Japanese Dysphagia Diet 2013 Criteria and the International Dysphagia Diet Standardisation Initiative

Yui Yokote1,2, Nanako Takata2, Yoshie Yamagata2 and Jun Kayashita1,2*

1Graduate School of Comprehensive Scientific Research, Prefectural University of Hiroshima, Japan
2Department of Health Sciences, Prefectural University of Hiroshima, Japan
*Corresponding Author: Jun Kayashita, Graduate School of Comprehensive Scientific Research, Prefectural University of Hiroshima, Minami-ku, Hiroshima-shi, Hiroshima, Japan.
Received: August 08, 2017; Published: September 08, 2017



The aim of this study is to classify thickened liquids into the International Dysphagia Diet Standardisation Initiative (IDDSI) framework by IDDSI flow test and compare the results to Japanese Dysphagia Diet 2013 criteria (JDD2013). We used five differ- ent types of thickeners and solvents. JDD2013 is constructed in Mildly Thick, Moderately Thick and Extremely Thick. For the IDDSI flow test, a syringe was filled up to the 10 ml mark and allowed to flow for 10s and judged by 5 criteria. The Mildly Thick liquids in JDD2013 that corresponded as 55% were level 1 in IDDSI and those corresponded as 43% were level 2. The Moderately Thick liquids that corresponded 71% were level 2. The Extremely Thick liquids that corresponded 94% were level 3. None of the liquids corresponded to level 4.

keywords: Dysphagia Diet; Thickened Liquid; Deglutition; Deglutition Disorders; Swallowing

  1. UN (United Nations). “World Population Ageing 2015 Report” (2015).
  2. UN (United Nations). “World Population Prospects: The 2015 Revision” (2015).
  3. Garin, N., et al. “Viscosity differences between thickened beverages suitable for elderly patients with dysphagia”. Dysphagia4 (2014): 483-488.
  4. http://www.strokeassociation.org/STROKEORG/
  5. http://www.ialp.info/
  6. “National Dysphagia Diet Task Force National dysphagia diet: Standardization for optimal care”. Journal of the American Dietetic Association (2002): 26-36.
  7. Dietitians Association of Australia and the Speech Pathology Association of Australia Limited. “Texture-modified foods and thickened fluids as used for individuals with dysphagia: Australian standardised labels and definitions”. Nutrition and Dietetics2 (2007): S53-S76.
  8. IDDSI Framework Detailed Descriptors, Testing Methods and Evidence (Drinks: Levels 0-4) (2016).
  9. Cichero JA., et al. “The need for international terminology and definitions for texture-modified foods and thickened liquids used in dysphagia management: Foundations of a global initiative”. Current Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Reports 1 (2013): 280-291.
  10. Vilardell N., et al. “A Comparative Study Between Modified Starch and Xanthan Gum Thickeners in Post-Stroke Oropharyngeal Dysphagia”. Dysphagia2 (2016): 169-179.
  11. Leonard RJ., et al. “Effects of bolus rheology on aspiration in patients with Dysphagia”. Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics4 (2014): 590-594.
  12. Wood FW. “Psychophysical studies on the consistency of liquid foods”. In: Rheology and Texture of Foodstuffs, S. C. I. Monograph 27 (1968): 40-49.
  13. Shama F., et al. “Identification of stimuli controlling the sensory evaluation of Viscosity. Oral Methods”. Journal of Texture Studies1 (1973): 111-118.
  14. Yamagata Y., et al. “Determination of a Suitable Shear Rate for Thickened Liquids Easy for the Elderly to Swallow”. Food Science and Technology Research 3 (2012): 363-369.
  15. Garcia JM., et al. “Viscosity measurements of nectar-and honey-thick liquids: product, liquid, and time comparisons”. Dysphagia4 (2005): 325-335.
  16. Matta Z., et al. “Sensory characteristics of beverages prepared with commercial thickeners used for dysphagia diets”. Journal of the American Dietetic Association 7 (2006): 1049-1054.
  17. Hamlet S., et al. “Normal adult swallowing of liquid and viscous material: Scintigraphic data on bolus transit and oropharyngeal residues”. Dysphagia1 (1996): 41-47.
  18. Mann LL., et al. “Development of an objective method for assessing viscosity of formulated foods and beverages for the dysphagic diet”. Journal of the American Dietetic Association 96.6 (1996): 585-588.
  19. Nicosia MA., et al. “The usefulness of the Line Spread Test as a measure of liquid consistency”. Dysphagia4 (2007): 306-311.
  20. Saint-Aubert C., et al. “Comparison of two tests used for the classification of food thickeners in the management of dysphagia”. Gums and Stablilisers for the Food Industry 17 (2014): 359-368.
  21. Cichero JA., et al. “Development of International Terminology and Definitions for Texture-Modified Foods and Thickened Fluids Used in Dysphagia Management: The IDDSI Framework”. Dysphagia2 (2017): 293-314.
  22. Newman R., et al. “Effect of Bolus Viscosity on the Safety and Efficacy of Swallowing and the Kinematics of the Swallow Response in Patients with Oropharyngeal Dysphagia: White Paper by the European Society for Swallowing Disorders (ESSD)”. Dysphagia2 (2016): 232-249.

Jun Kayashita., et al. “A Comparison of Viscosity Classifications Between the Japanese Dysphagia Diet 2013 Criteria and the International Dysphagia Diet Standardisation Initiative”. EC Nutrition  10.5 (2017): 185-194.