EC Pulmonology and Respiratory Medicine

Research Article Volume 14 Issue 1 - 2025

The Survival Benefits of Veno-Venous Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (VV-ECMO) in Severe COVID-19: A Single Center Retrospective Observational Analysis Of 10 Cases

Trilok Chand1*, Tarig Mohamed El Hassan2, Rania Zeineldin3, Nehad Nabil Halawa4 and Maryam Khalid Akbar5

1Consultant and Head Pulmonologist, Burjeel Hospital, Abu Dhabi, UAE

2Specialist and Head Cardiothoracic Surgery, Burjeel Hospital, Abu Dhabi, UAE

3Specialist Pulmonologist, Burjeel Hospital, Abu Dhabi, UAE

4Specialist and Head Critical Care Medicine, Burjeel Hospital, Abu Dhabi, UAE

5Medical Student Observer, Burjeel Hospital, Abu Dhabi, UAE

*Corresponding Author: Trilok Chand, Consultant and Head, Pulmonology Department, Burjeel Hospital, Al Najdah Street, Abu Dhabi, UAE.
Received: November 19, 2024; Published:December 23, 2024



Background: The precise role of veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV-ECMO) in managing patients with COVID-19-induced acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) remains uncertain. Therefore, we examined the clinical progression and survival outcomes of severe COVID-19 patients and to identify the factors linked to survivability.

Methods: A retrospective study was conducted at a single center on severe COVID-19 patients with ARDS who were on mechanical ventilator support and were treated with VV-ECMO. The study evaluated baseline characteristics, ventilatory and ECMO parameters, pre-ECMO laboratory parameters, and demographics. A close follow-up was conducted for the first three months following hospital discharge, followed by regular check-ups extending to two to three years.

Results: The mean duration of mechanical ventilation before ECMO and meantime under ECMO were 6.8 ± 10.9 days and 35.5 ± 30.6 days, respectively. The hospital length of stay was 101.1 ± 73.95 days. The survival rate for patients on ECMO was 60%, while 50% of the patients having survived to date. The duration of hospital stays, time on ECMO and mechanical ventilation, and age were not associated with the survivability outcome of the patients.

Conclusion: The success rate of VV-ECMO in this study may encourage the widespread use of ECMO in severe COVID-19 pneumonia besides refractory to conventional ventilator support and other therapies. No significant predictive factors for the duration of ECMO support were identified, the decision to discontinue therapy should not be based solely on the length of ECMO treatment.

 Keywords: Severe COVID-19; Hypoxia; VV-ECMO; ARDS; Mechanical Ventilator; COVID-19 Mortality

  1. Wu Zunyou and Jennifer M McGoogan. “Characteristics of and important lessons from the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak in China: Summary of a report of 72 314 cases from the Chinese center for disease control and prevention”. The Journal of the American Medical Association 13 (2020): 1239-1242.
  2. Grasselli Giacomo., et al. “Baseline characteristics and outcomes of 1591 patients infected with SARS-CoV-2 admitted to ICUs of the Lombardy Region, Italy”. The Journal of the American Medical Association16 (2020): 1574-1581.
  3. ARDS Definition Task Force., et al. “Acute respiratory distress syndrome: The Berlin Definition”. The Journal of the American Medical Association23 (2012): 2526-2533.
  4. COVID-19 Excess Mortality Collaborators. “Estimating excess mortality due to the COVID-19 pandemic: a systematic analysis of COVID-19-related mortality, 2020-21”. Lancet (London, England)10334 (2022): 1513-1536.
  5. Badulak Jenelle., et al. “Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for COVID-19: Updated 2021 guidelines from the extracorporeal life support organization”. ASAIO journal (American Society for Artificial Internal Organs: 1992)5 (2021): 485-495.
  6. Australia and New Zealand Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (ANZ ECMO) Influenza Investigators., et al. “Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for 2009 influenza A(H1N1) acute respiratory distress syndrome”. The Journal of the American Medical Association17 (2009): 1888-1895.
  7. Pham Tài., et al. “Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for pandemic influenza A (H1N1)-induced acute respiratory distress syndrome: a cohort study and propensity-matched analysis”. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine3 (2013): 276-285.
  8. Smith Deane E., et al. “One-year outcomes with venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support for severe COVID-19”. The Annals of Thoracic Surgery1 (2022): 70-75.
  9. Teijeiro-Paradis Ricardo and Lorenzo Del Sorbo. “VV-ECMO in severe COVID-19: multidimensional perspectives on the use of a complex treatment”. The Lancet. Respiratory Medicine2 (2023): 113-115.
  10. Schmidt Matthieu., et al. “Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for severe acute respiratory distress syndrome associated with COVID-19: a retrospective cohort study”. The Lancet. Respiratory Medicine11 (2020): 1121-1131.
  11. Combes Alain., et al. “Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for severe acute respiratory distress syndrome”. The New England Journal of Medicine21 (2018): 1965-1975.
  12. Barbaro Ryan P., et al. “Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support in COVID-19: an international cohort study of the Extracorporeal Life Support Organization registry”. Lancet (London, England)10257 (2020): 1071-1078.
  13. Dave Sagar B., et al. “A descriptive evaluation of causes of death in venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation”. Perfusion 1 (2023): 66-74.
  14. Arentz Matt., et al. “Characteristics and outcomes of 21 critically ill patients with COVID-19 in Washington State”. The Journal of the American Medical Association 16 (2020): 1612-1614.
  15. Wang Dawei., et al. “Clinical characteristics of 138 hospitalized patients with 2019 novel coronavirus-infected pneumonia in Wuhan, China”. The Journal of the American Medical Association 11 (2020): 1061-1069.
  16. Huang Chaolin., et al. “Clinical features of patients infected with 2019 novel coronavirus in Wuhan, China”. Lancet (London, England)10223 (2020): 497-506.
  17. Extracorporeal Life Support Organization. Full COVID-19 Registry Dashboard (2024).
  18. COVID-19 Survey (2024).
  19. Henry Brandon Michael. “COVID-19, ECMO, and lymphopenia: a word of caution”. The Lancet. Respiratory Medicine4 (2020): e24.
  20. Brodie Daniel., et al. “Extracorporeal life support for adults with respiratory failure and related indications: a review”. The Journal of the American Medical Association6 (2019): 557-568.
  21. Li Xin., et al. “Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for coronavirus disease 2019 in Shanghai, China”. ASAIO Journal (American Society for Artificial Internal Organs: 1992)5 (2020): 475-481.
  22. Yang Yang., et al. “Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in coronavirus disease 2019-associated acute respiratory distress syndrome: An initial US experience at a high-volume centre”. Cardiac Failure Review 6 (2020): e17.
  23. Naar Jan., et al. “A total of 207 days of veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support for severe COVID-19 prior to successful lung transplantation: a case report”. Journal of Personalized Medicine12 (2022): 2028.
  24. Kurihara Chitaru., et al. “Outcomes after extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support in COVID-19 and non-COVID-19 patients”. Artificial Organs4 (2022): 688-696.
  25. Martínez-Martínez María., et al. “Survival and long-term functional status of COVID-19 patients requiring prolonged extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support”. Annals of the American Thoracic Society3 (2024): 449-455.
  26. Helmy Mina A., et al. “Bleeding and thrombotic complications in patients with severe COVID-19: A prospective observational study”. Health Science Reports4 (2022): e736.

Trilok Chand., et al. "The Survival Benefits of Veno-Venous Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (VV-ECMO) in Severe COVID-19: A Single Center Retrospective Observational Analysis Of 10 Cases". EC Pulmonology and Respiratory Medicine  14.1 (2025): 01-09.