EC Psychology and Psychiatry

Review Article Volume 12 Issue 5 - 2023

The Body Schema: Current Data and Definition

EW Pireyre*

Psychomotricien, Hôpital Théophile Roussel, rue Philippe Mithouard, Montesson, France

*Corresponding Author: EW Pireyre, Psychomotricien, Hôpital Théophile Roussel, rue Philippe Mithouard, Montesson, France.
Received: February 14, 2023; Published:May 19, 2023



This paper is the second of two about the relationship between the body schema (BS) concept and neurosciences. The first one concerned the history of the body schema concept. Dolto [1] and Gallagher [2] let go the body schema to the neurological and neurophysiological equipment. Since then, body schema has become a very good research field in neurosciences. Body image is an affective concept about the relationship between mind and body. Body schema is a physiological notion with proprioceptive, visual (including peripheral retina which involves movements and brightness vision and is located on the peripheral retina) and vestibular informations. Motor systems are engaged too. Vestibular system is engaged for the postural modifications change the weight of gravity. Interoception and touch are not supposed to interfere with body schema. Neurosciences taught us to take in account a new kind of space to include into the body schema: the peri-personal space. Different regions of the brain are involved in the body schema notion. They are described here.

Keywords: Body Schema; Neurosciences; Proprioception; Peripheral Vision; Vestibular Information; Peri-Personal Space; Neuron Networks; Cortices; Psychomotricity

  1. Dolto F. “The unconscious image of the body”. Paris: Threshold (1984).
  2. Gallagher S and Cole J. “Body schema and body image in a deafferented subject”. Journal of mind and Behavior 16 (1995): 369-390.
  3. Fontan A. “The construction of the body schema in a developing brain”. Doctoral thesis in neuroscience under the supervision of Christine Assaiante. Aix en Provence (2017).
  4. Head H and Holmes G. “Sensory disturbances from cerebral lesions”. Brain2-3 (1911): 102-254.
  5. Naito E., et al. “Body representations in the human brain revealed by kinesthetic illusions and their essential contributions to motor control and corporal awareness”. Neuroscience Research 14 (2016): 16-30.
  6. Damasio A. “The strange order of things”. Paris: Odile Jacob (2017).
  7. Breedlove SM., et al. “Psychobiologie”. Paris: de Boeck (2012).
  8. Richard D and Orsal D. “Neurophysiologie”. Paris: Dunod (2007).
  9. De Preester H. “Body image and visceral dimension”. Theoria et Historia Scientiarum 8.2 (2008).
  10. Parson LM. “Body image”. In M.W. Eysenck (Edition.) The Blackwell Dictionary of cognitive psychology. Oxford: Blackwell Reference (1990).
  11. Gibson JJ. “The ecological approach to visual perception”. Boston: Houghton-Mifflin (1979).
  12. Jouen F. “Visual-proprioceptive control of posture in newborn infants”. In Amblard G., Berthoz A., Clarac F. (Editions). Posture and gait: development, adaptation and modulation Amsterdam: Excerpta Medica (1988).
  13. Bullinger A. “Le développement sensori-moteur et ses avatars”. Paris: Erès (2023).
  14. Bonnier P. “L’aschématie”. Revue de neurologie 12 (1902): 605-609.
  15. Schilder P. “L’image du corps”. Paris: Galimard (1980).
  16. Sang F., et al. “Depersonnalisation/derealisation symptoms in vestibular disease”. Journal of Neurosurgery and Psychiatry3 (2006): 760-766.
  17. Lopez C., et al. “Body ownership and embodiement: Vestibular and multisensory mechanisms”. Clinical Neurophysiology3 (2008): 149-161.
  18. Borel L., et al. “Walking performance of vestibular-defective patients before and after unilateral vestibular neurotomy”. Behavioural Brain Research 150 (2004): 191-200.
  19. Schmidt L., et al. “Now you feel both: galvanic vestibular stimulation induces lasting improvements in the rehabilitation of chronic tactile extinction”. Frontiers Human Neuroscience 2 (2013): 7.
  20. Leggenhager B and Lopez C. “Vestibular contributions to the sense of body, self and others”. In Metzinger T and Windt J. “Open MIND. Frankfurt am Main: MIND Group (2015).
  21. Bresciani JP., et al. “Galvanic vestibular stimulation in human produces online arm movement deviations when reaching towards memorized visual targets”. Neuroscientific Letters 318 (2002): 34-38.
  22. Lopez C. “A neuroscientific account of how vestibular disorders impair bodily self-consciousness”. Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience91 (2013).
  23. Hashimoto T and Iriki A. “Dissociations between the horizontal and dorso-ventral axes in body-size perception”. European Journal of Neuroscience 37 (2013): 1747-1753.
  24. Roy JE and Cullen KE. “Dissociated self-generated from passively applied head motion: Neural mechanisms in the vestibular nuclei”. Journal of Neuroscience9 (2004): 2102-2111.
  25. Paillard J. “Kwowing where and kwowing how to get there”. In Paillard, J. (Edition.). Brain and Space, New-York: Oxford University Press (1991): 461-481.
  26. Guillaud E., et al. “Prediction of the body rotation-induced torques on the arm during reaching movments: Evidence from a proprioceptive deafferented subject”. Neuropsychologia7 (2011): 2055-2059.
  27. Berthoz A. “How does the cerebral cortex process and utilize vestibular signals?” In Baloh, R. W. et Halmagyi (Editions.). Disorders of the vestibular system New York: Oxford University Press (1996): 113-125.
  28. Brain WR. “Visual dissociation with special reference to lesions of the right cerebral hemisphere”. Brain 64 (1941): 244-272.
  29. Rizzolatti G., et al. “Afferente properties of periarcuate neurons in macaque monkeys: I. Somatosensory responses”. Behavioral Brain Research 2 (1981): 125-146.
  30. D’Angelo M., et al. “The sense of agency shapes body schema and peripersonnal space”. Scientific Reports 8 (2018): 13847.
  31. Canzoneri E., et al. “Tool-use reshapes the boundaries of body and peripersonnal space representations”. Experimental Brain Research (2013): 25-42.
  32. Noël JP., et al. “Full body action remapping peripersonnal space: the case of walking”. Neuropsychologia (2014).
  33. De Vignemont F and Ianetti GD. “How many peripersonnal spaces?” Neuropsychologia (2014).
  34. Di Pellegrino G and Ladavas E. “Peripersonnal space in the brain”. Neuropsychologia 66 (2015): 126-133.
  35. Linkenauger SA., et al. “Taking a hands-on approach: apparent grasping ability scales the perception of object size”. Journal of Experimental Psychology and Human Perceptual Performance5 (2011): 1432-1441.
  36. Meltzoff AN and Moore MK. “Imitation of facial and manual gestures by human neonates”. Science 198 (1977): 75-78.
  37. Assaiante C. “Expertise collective: dyspraxia: Synthèse et recommandations”. Institut thématique INSERM”. Ecriture du chapitre: Développement sensori-moteur chez l’enfant TDC (2019).
  38. Van Helk M., et al. “You’ll never crawl alone: neurophysiological evidence for experience-dependant motor resonance in infancy”. Neuroimage4 (2008): 808-814.
  39. Assaiante C., et al. “Body schema building during childhood and adolescence: a sensory approach”. Clinical Neurophysiology 1 (2014): 3-12.
  40. Caçola P and Gabbard C. “Modulating peripersonnal space and extrapersonnal reach space via tool use: a comparison between 6- to 12- years-olds and young adults”. Experimental Brain Research 218 (2012): 321-330.
  41. Gabbard C., et al. “Estimation of reach in peripersonnal and extrapersonnal space: A developmental view”. Developmental Psychology3 (2007): 749-756.
  42. Pireyre E. “Clinique de l’image du corps”. Paris: Dunod (2021).

EW Pireyre. The Body Schema: Current Data and Definition. EC Psychology and Psychiatry 12.5 (2023): 15-25.