EC Psychology And Psychiatry

In an article based on the book by L.S. Vygotsky’s “Psychology of Art” examines the principles that the author attributes to discursivity, which determined the formation and development of the scientific discipline of the same name “psychology of art”. The author identifies and analyzes four such principles: the complementarity of the analysis of specific works of art and the characteristics of the essence of art, the reliance of psychological comprehension and analysis on art historical knowledge, the principle of historicity and the similarity of the creative process of a psychologist with a number of thinking strategies known in philosophy. In conclusion, Vygotsky's approach to understanding art is compared with the approach of Mikhail Bakhtin.

 Keywords: Art; Psychology; Principles; Thinking; Work; Essence; Interpretation; Explanation; Ideas

1. Ailamazyan AM and Tashkeeva EI. “Musical movement: pedagogy, psychology, artistic practice”. Culture and Art 2 (2014): 206-244.
2. Bakhtin M. “Questions of literature and aesthetics”. M: Artist. lit. (1975): 502.
3. Vygotsky LS. “Psychology of art”. 3^rd M: Art (1986): 572.
4. Vygotsky LS. “Historical meaning of psychological crisis”. Collection cit.: in 6 volumes. M., T.1. WITH (1982): 292-436.
5. Vygotsky LS. “On the question of the psychology of an actor’s creativity”. Collection Op. In 6 volumes. M.: Pedagogy 6 (1984): 319-328.
6. Rozin VM. “Methodological problems of psychology”. 2^nd M.: Yurayt (2019): 358.
7. Rozin VM. “From analysis of works of art to understanding the essence of art”. M. Golos (2022): 272.
8. Rozin VM. “History and philosophy of science: textbook for universities”. 2^nd edition, rev. and additional - Moscow: Yurayt Publishing House (2023): 414.
9. Sobkin VS. “Comments on theater reviews by Lev Vygotsky”. M: Institute of Sociology of Education RAO (2015): 568.
10. Sobkin VS. ““Ah, “Poor Liza”, ah!” – Experience of psychological analysis of the story by N.M. Karamzina”. National Psychological Journal38 (2020).