EC Psychology And Psychiatry

Digital technologies have fundamentally transformed modern life, reshaping how individuals communicate, learn, work, seek healthcare, and maintain social relationships. While these advances have generated unprecedented benefits, psychiatrists are increasingly encountering patients whose excessive engagement with smartphones, social media, online gaming, streaming platforms, artificial intelligence (AI)-based conversational systems, and other digital environments contributes to significant psychological distress and functional impairment. Despite this growing clinical reality, only gambling disorder and gaming disorder have achieved formal recognition as disorders due to addictive behaviors, whereas many other problematic digital behaviors remain outside established diagnostic classifications. This discrepancy has created uncertainty regarding terminology, diagnosis, and management. This viewpoint argues that the absence of formal diagnostic recognition should not delay clinical attention to problematic digital behaviors. Psychiatry has historically adapted to changing social environments, and the current digital revolution represents another such transition. Rather than debating whether every form of excessive technology use constitutes an independent psychiatric disorder, clinicians should adopt a pragmatic, patient-centered approach that focuses on impaired control, compulsive engagement, functional impairment, and associated psychiatric comorbidity. Emerging evidence from neuroscience, behavioral psychology, and digital psychiatry demonstrates that problematic digital behaviors share several mechanisms with recognized behavioral addictions, including dysregulation of reward processing, impaired executive control, maladaptive coping, and reinforcement learning. Routine psychiatric assessment should therefore incorporate evaluation of digital behaviors as part of the standard psychosocial history. Future research should prioritize longitudinal studies, standardized assessment methods, culturally appropriate interventions, and ethical guidance regarding rapidly evolving digital technologies, particularly generative artificial intelligence. Psychiatry has an opportunity to move beyond the diagnostic debate and develop clinically meaningful approaches that recognize both the benefits and the risks of digital technologies.

 Keywords: Digital Psychiatry; Problematic Digital Behaviors; Behavioral Addiction; Smartphone Use; Social Media; Artificial Intelligence; Gaming Disorder

1. Brand M., et al. “Integrating psychological and neurobiological considerations regarding the development and maintenance of specific Internet-use disorders: An Interaction of Person-Affect-Cognition-Execution (I-PACE) model”. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews 71 (2016): 252-266.
2. Brand M., et al. “The Interaction of Person-Affect-Cognition-Execution (I-PACE) model for addictive behaviors: Update, generalization to addictive behaviors beyond internet-use disorders, and specification of the process character of addictive behaviors”. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews 104 (2019): 1-10.
3. Grant JE., et al. “Introduction to behavioral addictions”. American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse 5 (2010): 233-241.
4. Billieux J., et al. “Can disordered mobile phone use be considered a behavioral addiction? An update on current evidence and a comprehensive model for future research”. Current Addiction Reports2 (2015): 156-162.
5. First MB., et al. “DSM-5-TR: Rationale, process, and overview of changes”. Psychiatric Services 8 (2023): 869-875.
6. Musetti A., et al. “Gaming disorder in the ICD-11: the state of the game”. BMC Psychiatry1 (2025): 1114.
7. Brand M., et al. “Which conditions should be considered as disorders in the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-11) designation of "other specified disorders due to addictive behaviors"?”. Journal of Behavioral Addictions2 (2022): 150-159.
8. Kardefelt‐Winther D., et al. “How can we conceptualize behavioural addiction without pathologizing common behaviours?”. Addiction10 (2017): 1709-1715.
9. Potenza MN. “Should addictive disorders include non‐substance‐related conditions?”. Addiction1 (2006): 142-151.
10. Wang Y., et al. “Boredom proneness and rumination mediate relationships between depression and anxiety with problematic smartphone use severity”. Current Psychology8 (2022): 5287-5297.
11. Keles B., et al. “A systematic review: the influence of social media on depression, anxiety and psychological distress in adolescents”. International Journal of Adolescence and Youth1 (2020): 79-93.
12. Elhai JD., et al. “Fear of missing out, need for touch, anxiety and depression are related to problematic smartphone use”. Computers in Human Behavior 63 (2016): 509-516.
13. Fineberg NA., et al. “Advances in problematic usage of the internet research-A narrative review by experts from the European network for problematic usage of the internet”. Comprehensive Psychiatry 118 (2022): 152346.
14. Scott H., et al. “Social media use and adolescent sleep patterns: cross-sectional findings from the UK millennium cohort study”. BMJ Open9 (2019): e031161.
15. Brand M., et al. “Current advances in behavioral addictions: From fundamental research to clinical practice”. American Journal of Psychiatry2 (2025): 155-163.
16. World Health Organization. “Public health implications of excessive use of the internet, computers, smartphones and similar electronic devices”. Meeting report, Main Meeting Hall, Foundation for Promotion of Cancer Research, National Cancer Research Centre, Tokyo, Japan, 27-29 August 2014. World Health Organization (2015).