EC Paediatrics

Research Article Volume 14 Issue 8 - 2025

Respiratory Improvements in Type 1 Spinal Muscular Atrophy Treated with Disease-Modifying Therapies: An Observational Study in Chile

María Angelica Palomino Montenegro*, Javiera Jofre, Bernardita Suarez, Cecilia Hervias, Giancarlo Calcagno, Mariana Haro and Claudia Castiglioni

Clinica Las Condes-Universidad Finis Terrae, Santiago, Chile

*Corresponding Author: María Angelica Palomino Montenegro, Clinica Las Condes-Universidad Finis Terrae, Santiago, Chile.
Received: June 20, 2025; Published: July 17, 2025



Introduction: Spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) is a genetic disease with homozygous deletion or mutation of the SMN1 motor neuron survival gene. Incidence is 1 in 10,000 births. Clinical manifestations include variable progressive muscle weakness, respiratory and bulbar muscle involvement, respiratory failure, dependence on noninvasive ventilation (NIV) or tracheostomy tubes (TQ) with normal cognitive development; about 50% are SMA type 1. In 2017, specific molecules emerged that increase SMN protein through messenger RNA splicing modifications or gene therapy, improving motor function. Data on respiratory outcomes are limited, the main cause of premature death or morbidity.

Objective: To describe the ongoing respiratory status of children with SMA1 treated with specific therapies at a national referral center in Chile.

Method: Prospective cohort of SMA1 patients treated at the neuromuscular disease program at Clinica Las Condes, Santiago, Chile 2017 to 2022. A respiratory care guideline for ventilatory failure prevention was developed, with early noninvasive ventilatory support (NIVS), high IPAPs (14 to 18) and low EPAPs (3-4), differential 10-15, nasal interface, plus pulmonary recruitment with cough assistance equipment and/or ambu bag. Approved by Institution Ethics Committee 2017. Respiratory support and complications were recorded until 2024.

Results: Thirty-three SMA1 patients receiving treatment were recruited: nursinersen 28, risdiplam 4, gene therapy 8, and combination therapy 7. The median age at diagnosis was 2 months (0-10), and the median current age is 36 months (4-94); 48% (16/33) were admitted with TQ for follow-up and are still on it, one patient died. 18 patients were admitted without TQ, started with early NIVS; one on presymptomatic treatment never used NIVS: 50% (9/18) with NIVS achieved sitting position and 2 were able to walk. Four patients were intubated, one of them was successfully extubated on 3 occasions. Children without TQ use NIV at night and during respiratory infections. Twenty-seven hospitalizations were recorded in 11 patients; 2 patients have chronic atelectasis at start of protocol. None develop chronic atelectasis during protocol follow up.

Conclusion: Despite specific therapies improved motor function, patients with TQ at the beginning of the study are still on it. Patients without TQ at baseline have been unable to discontinue NIVS, but they require same o less support, with shorter hospitalizations and complications. Starting specific therapies presymptomatic o very early in the course of the diseases have better motor and respiratory outcomes, however NIVS is crucial to have less respiratory complications and medical resource utilization.

 Keywords. Spinal Muscular Atrophy; Respiratory Care; Non-Invasive Ventilation; Non-Invasive Ventilatory Support; Nursinersen; Risdiplam; Gene Therapy; Onasemnogene Abeparvovec

  1. Palomino MA and Castiglioni C. “Respiratory care in spinal muscular atrophy in the new therapeutic era”. Revista Chilena de Pediatría6 (2018): 685-693.
  2. Mercuri E., et al. “Diagnosis and management of spinal muscular atrophy: Part 1: Recommendations for diagnosis, rehabilitation, orthopedic and nutritional care”. Neuromuscular Disorders2 (2018): 103-115.
  3. Finkel RS., et al. “Diagnosis and management of spinal muscular atrophy: Part 2: Pulmonary and acute care medications, supplements and immunizations other organ systems and ethics”. Neuromuscular Disorders3 (2018): 197-207.
  4. Dangouloff T., et al. “Newborn screening programs for spinal muscular atrophy worldwide: Where we stand and where to go”. Neuromuscular Disorders6 (2021): 574-582.
  5. Swoboda KJ., et al. “Natural history of denervation in SMA: Relation to age, SMN2 copy number, and function”. Annals of Neurology 5 (2005): 704-712.
  6. Oskoui M., et al. “The changing natural history of spinal muscular atrophy type 1”. Neurology20 (2007): 1931-1936.
  7. Sansone Racca F., et al. “1st Italian SMA Family Association Consensus Meeting”. Neuromuscular Disorders12 (2015): 979-989.
  8. Fay A. “Spinal muscular atrophy: A (Now) treatable neurodegenerative disease”. Pediatric Clinics of North America5 (2023): 963-977.
  9. Wang CH., et al. “Standard of Care. Consensus statement for standard of care in spinal muscular atrophy”. Journal of Child Neurology 8 (2007): 1027-1049.
  10. Finkel RS., et al. “Nusinersen versus sham control in infantile-onset spinal muscular atrophy”. New England Journal of Medicine 18 (2017): 1723-1732.
  11. Mendell JR., et al. “Single-dose gene-replacement therapy for spinal muscular atrophy”. New England Journal of Medicine 18 (2017): 1713-1722.
  12. Łusakowska A., et al. “Long-term nusinersen treatment across a wide spectrum of spinal muscular atrophy severity: a real-world experience”. Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases 1 (2023): 230.
  13. Edel L., et al. “A new respiratory scoring system for evaluation of respiratory outcomes in children with spinal muscular atrophy type1 (SMA1) on SMN enhancing drugs”. Neuromuscular Disorders 4 (2021): 300-309.
  14. Palomino MA and Castiglioni C. “Atrofia Muscular Espinal: manejo respiratorio en la perspectiva de los recientes avances terapeuticos”. Revista Medica Clinica Las Condes 1 (2017): 119-130.
  15. Bach JR. “Prevention of precuts excavated for children with spinal muscular atrophy type I”. American Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 10 (2003): 815-819.
  16. Bach JR., et al. “Changing trends in the management of end-stage neuromuscular respiratory muscle failure. Recommendations of an international consensus”. American Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 3 (2013): 267-277.
  17. Bach JR and Palmieri JL. “A paradigm shift for the management of critically ill patients with spinal muscular atrophy”. Respiratory Care 10 (2023): 1481-1482.
  18. Al-Subu AM and Brazelton TB. “Management of critically ill patients with spinal muscular atrophy admitted with acute respiratory failure: The authors' reply”. Respiratory Care 10 (2023): 1483-1484.
  19. Karin Alvarez., et al. “Observations from a nationwide vigilance program in medical care for Spinal Muscular Atrophy patients in Chile”. Arquivos de Neuro-Psiquiatria7 (2019): 470-477.
  20. Bach JR., et al. “Soporte respiratorio muscular para evitar el fallo respiratorio y la traqueotomía: ventilación no invasiva y técnicas de tos asistida”. Revista Argentina de Medicina Respiratoria 2 (2013): 71-83.
  21. Francisco Prado Atlagic., et al. “Respiratory care in patients with spinal muscular atrophy to avoid acute ventilatory failure and tracheostomy: literature review and consensus recommendations”. Neumología Pediátrica 2 (2024): 49-58.

María Angelica Palomino Montenegro., et al. "Respiratory Improvements in Type 1 Spinal Muscular Atrophy Treated with Disease-Modifying Therapies: An Observational Study". EC Paediatrics 14.8 (2025): 01-08.