EC Paediatrics

Research Article Volume 12 Issue 6 - 2023

Imaging of Osteochondritis: About 7 Cases and Literature Review

S Habib Chorfa*, N Amsiguine, B Bequali, B Dghoughi, N Allali and L Chat S El Haddad

Peditaric Radiology Department, Ibn SINA University Hospital of Rabat, Morocco

*Corresponding Author: S Habib Chorfa, Peditaric Radiology Department, Ibn SINA University Hospital of Rabat, Morocco.
Received: April 30, 2023; Published: May 27, 2023



Osteochondritis is a condition of the subchondral bone and cartilage of children between three and ten years old in the majority of cases, due to aseptic cephalic necrosis of an etiology not yet elucidated. It results in intermittent pain and limitation of joint movement. Radiography is essential for the diagnosis and makes it possible to define the evolutionary phase (necrosis, revascularization, reconstruction, sequelae), as well as the severity of the cephalic attack by the Herring classification. Scintigraphy allows preradiological diagnosis, but magnetic resonance imaging represents the gold standard offering a much more precise analysis of lesions.

The age of onset, the severity of the stiffness, the progressive stage, the classification and the occurrence of progressive eccentricity are the bases of the therapeutic choice. Treatment can be orthopedic in the form of prolonged discharge, bed traction or abduction splint, which are less and less used today. In certain specific indications, surgery often modifies the natural history of the disease. In severe forms, progression can lead to relatively early osteoarthritis.

Keywords: Osteochondritis; Necrosis; Revascularization; Reconstruction; Sequelae

  1. De Smet AA., et al. “Untreated osteochondritis dissecans of the femoral condyles: prediction of patient outcome using radiographic and MR findings”. Skeletal Radiology 26 (1997): 463-467.
  2. Pill SG., et al. “Role of magnetic resonance imaging and clinical criteria in predicting successful nonoperative treatment of osteochondritis dissecans in children”. Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics B 23 (2003): 102-108.
  3. Hughes JA., et al. “Juvenile osteochondritis dissecans: a 5-year review of the natural history using clinical and MRI evaluation”. Pediatric Radiology 33 (2003): 410-417.
  4. Luhmann SJ., et al. “Magnetic resonance imaging of the knee in children and adolescents. Its role in clinical decision-making”. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery American 87 (2005): 497-502.
  5. De Smet AA., et al. “Osteochondritis dissecans of the knee: value of MR imaging in determining lesion stability and the presence of articular cartilage defects”. American Journal of Roentgenology 155 (1990): 549-553.
  6. Cahill BR and Berg BC. “99m-Technetium phosphate compound joint scintigraphy in the management of juvenile osteochondritis dissecans of the femoral condyles”. The American Journal of Sports Medicine 11 (1983): 329-335.
  7. Robertson W., et al. “Osteochondritis dissecans of the knee in children”. Current Opinion in Pediatrics 15 (2003): 38-44.
  8. Yoshida S., et al. “Osteochondritis dissecans of the femoral condyle in the growth stage”. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research (1998): 162-170.
  9. Jurgensen I., et al. “Arthroscopic versus conservative treatment of osteochondritis dissecans of the knee: value of magnetic resonance imaging in therapy planning and follow-up”. Arthroscopy 18 (2002): 378-386.

S Habib Chorfa., et al. Imaging of Osteochondritis: About 7 Cases and Literature Review. EC Paediatrics 12.6 (2023):30-34.