Research Article Volume 17 Issue 1 - 2026

Ultrasonographic Evaluation of Lumbar Intervertebral Discs Protrusion in High School Aged Children

Rizvan Ya Abdullaiev*, Igor A Voronzhev, Roman R Abdullaiev and Nataly S Lisenko

Kharkov National Medical University, Ukraine

*Corresponding Author: Rizvan Ya Abdullaiev, Kharkov National Medical University, Ukraine.
Received: December 16, 2025; Published: December 30, 2025



Materials and Methods: A retrospective analysis of the ultrasonography results of 180 lumbar intervertebral discs in 36 children aged 13 - 18 years was carried out. In 43 discs, degenerative changes in the nucleus pulposus and annulus fibrosus were detected, while the integrity of the annulus fibrosus was preserved. The examination was performed in sagittal and axial views. In the sagittal projection, the height of the vertebral bodies and intervertebral discs was measured, and in the axial projection, the anteroposterior dimensions of the central and lateral spinal canals were measured.

Results: In 4 (9.3 ± 4.4%) cases, the protrusion was located at the L2-L3 level, in 7 (16.3 ± 5.6%) cases - at the L3-L4 level, in 15 (34.9 ± 7.3%) cases - at the L4-L5 level, and in 17 (39.5 ± 7.5%) cases - at the L5-S1 level, respectively. There were no significant differences in the frequency of occurrence between L2-L3 and L3-L4, as well as L4-L5 and L5-S1. The lower located lumbar discs (74,4%) were significantly more affected than the upper (25,6%) ones (P < 0.001).

Median protrusion localization was recorded in 19 (44.2 ± 7.6%) cases, paramedian - in 18 (41.9 ± 7.5%) cases, and posterolateral - in 6 (13.9 ± 5.3%) cases, respectively. The median and paramedian protrusions was significantly more frequently recorded than the posterolateral (P < 0,01) types.

Conclusion:

  1. Among high school-aged children, lumbar intervertebral disc protrusion of lower (L5-S1 and L4-L5) locations is significantly (P < 0.001) more common than of the upper (L2-L3 and L3-L4) locations.
  2. Median and paramedian protrusion locations are significantly (P < 0.01) more common than posterolateral protrusion.

 Keywords: Lumbar Disc Degeneration in High School Aged Children; Ultrasonography; Protrusion of Lumbar Discs; Fibrous Ring; Nucleus Pulposus

  1. Beall DP., et al. “New biomaterials for degenerative disc disease”. The Disc and Degenerative Disc Disease: Remove or Regenerate? (2020): 273-309.
  2. Wangler S., et al. “Uncovering the secretome of mesenchymal stromal cells exposed to healthy, traumatic, and degenerative intervertebral discs: a proteomic analysis”. Stem Cell Research and Therapy1 (2021): 12-17.
  3. Kirnaz S., et al. “Pathomechanism and biomechanics of degenerative disc disease: features of healthy and degenerated discs”. International Journal of Spine Surgerys1 (2021): 10-25.
  4. Zielinska N., et al. “Risk factors of intervertebral disc pathology? A point of view formerly and today? A review”. Journal of Clinical Medicine3 (2021): 409.
  5. Kirnaz S., et al. “Fundamentals of intervertebral disc degeneration”. World Neurosurgery 157 (2022): 264-273.
  6. Xia Y., et al. “Application of mesenchymal stem cell-derived exosomes from different sources in intervertebral disc degeneration”. Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology 10 (2022): 1019437.
  7. Kim J-W., et al. “Regeneration in spinal disease: therapeutic role of hypoxia-inducible factor-1 alpha in regeneration of degenerative intervertebral disc”. International Journal of Molecular Sciences 10 (2021): 5281.
  8. Scarcia L., et al. “Degenerative disc disease of the spine: from anatomy to pathophysiology and radiological appearance, with morphological and functional considerations”. Journal of Personalized Medicine11 (2022): 1810.
  9. Zehra U., et al. “Mechanisms and clinical implications of intervertebral disc calcification”. Nature Reviews Rheumatology6 (2022): 352-362.
  10. Bogduk N. “On understanding the validity of diagnostic tests”. Interventional Pain Medicine2 (2022): 100127.
  11. Li B., et al. “Stem cell therapy and exercise for treatment of intervertebral disc degeneration”. Stem Cells International (2021): 7982333.
  12. Rajesh N., et al. “Smoking and degenerative spinal disease: A systematic review”. Brain and Spine 2 (2022): 100916.
  13. Thailand, R. C. of. “Can stem cells help reverse degenerative disc disease?” Stem Cell Regeneration Center. Stemcellthailand.Org (2024).
  14. Shivali Parwani., et al. “Study of causes, symptoms, and diagnosis of lumbar disc herniation”. CME Journal Geriatric Medicine3 (2025): 1-10.
  15. Lyu F-J., et al. “Painful intervertebral disc degeneration and inflammation: from laboratory evidence to clinical interventions”. Bone Research1 (2021): 7.
  16. Xin J., et al. “Treatment of intervertebral disc degeneration”. Orthopaedic Surgery7 (2022): 1271-1280.
  17. Chou R., et al. “The Global Spine Care Initiative: applying evidence-based guidelines on the non-invasive management of back and neck pain to low-and middle-income communities”. European Spine Journal6 (2018): 851-860.
  18. Foster NE., et al. “Prevention and treatment of low back pain: evidence, challenges, and promising directions”. The Lancet10137 (2018): 2368-2383.
  19. Almushayti ZA., et al. “Incidental findings during degenerative intervertebral disc disease evaluation at magnetic resonance imaging of the lumbar spine”. Medical Science107 (2021): 76-81.
  20. Barry MS., et al. “Facts and fallacies of diagnostic ultrasound of the adult spine”. Dynamic Chiropractic9 (2019).
  21. Rizvan Ya Abdullaiev., et al. “Degenerative findings on ultrasound of the cervical spine in children”. EC Orthopaedics 4 (2022): 106-113.
  22. Sääksjärvi S., et al. “Disc degeneration of young low back pain patients: a prospective 30-year follow-up MTI study”. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 19 (2020): 1341-1347.
  23. Spinal Ultrasonography. United Health care Community Plan Medical Policy. Effective 11/01/2020 Proprietary Information of UnitedHealthcare. Copyright 2020 United HealthCare Services (2021).
  24. Wu PH., et al. “Intervertebral disc diseases part 2: a review of the current diagnostic and treatment strategies for intervertebral disc disease”. International Journal of Molecular Sciences6 (2020): 2135.
  25. Chen SQ., et al. “Different spinal subtypes with varying characteristics of lumbar disc degeneration at specific level with age: A study based on an asymptomatic population”. Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research1 (2020): 3.
  26. Almushayti Z., et al. “Prevalence of MRI findings in lumbosacral spine in patients with chronic low back pain: A cross-sectional study”. Medical Science 26 (2022): ms33e2053.
  27. Rahmani N., et al. “Comparing the reliability of abdominal muscles thickness using ultrasonography in adolescents with low back pain and healthy adolescents”. Journal of Babol University of Medical Sciences 8 (2017): 12-19.
  28. Maeda M., et al. “Diagnosis of lumbar transverse process fractures in orthopedic clinics using sonography”. Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine 7 (2022): 1825-1835.

Rizvan Ya Abdullaiev., et al. “Ultrasonographic Evaluation of Lumbar Intervertebral Discs Protrusion in High School Aged Children”. EC Orthopaedics  17.1 (2026): 01-08.