Research Article Volume 17 Issue 5 - 2026

Infections Related to Osteosynthesis Materials: Epidemiological and Clinical Aspects in the Orthopedic and Trauma Surgery Department at the Gabriel Touré University Hospital

Abdoul Kadri Moussa*, Layes Touré, Mahamadou Diallo, Mamadou B Traoré, Kalifa Coulibaly, Drissa Coulibaly, Harouna Diallo and Youssouf Kassambara

Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Gabriel Touré University Hospital Center, Bamako, Mali

*Corresponding Author: Abdoul Kadri Moussa, Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Gabriel Touré University Hospital Cen- ter, University of Sciences, Techniques and Technologies of Bamako (USTTB), Bamako, Mali.
Received: April 20, 2026; Published: June 23, 2026



Introduction and Aim: Infections related to osteosynthesis hardware (IMO) represent a serious complication in orthopaedic surgery, with significant clinical and economic consequences. Surgical site infections associated with implanted devices remain a major concern due to increased morbidity, prolonged treatment duration, and healthcare costs [1,2]. The aim of this study was to describe the epidemiological, clinical, and microbiological aspects of osteosynthesis hardware infections at the Gabriel Touré University Hospital Center.

Materials and Methods: This was a retrospective and prospective study conducted from January 1, 2024, to December 31, 2024, including 40 patients presenting with osteoarticular infection.

Results: The frequency of IMO was 8.3% of surgical procedures, with a predominance among young men (80%, mean age 33.2 years). Open fractures (55%) and road traffic accidents (67.5%) were the main associated factors. Staphylococcus aureus was the most common pathogen (35%), showing high sensitivity to gentamicin. Hardware removal (60%) combined with appropriate antibiotic therapy led to a favorable outcome in 90% of cases; however, complications (nonunion, osteitis, amputation) occurred in 10% of patients.

Conclusion: Osteosynthesis hardware infections remain a major challenge, requiring early and multidisciplinary management. Strengthening preventive measures, optimizing antibiotic therapy, and improving aseptic conditions are essential to reduce their incidence and improve clinical outcomes.

Keywords: Infections; Osteosynthesis Hardware; Staphylococcus aureus; Open Fractures; Prevention; Bamako; Mali

  1. Hajjar J Valence. “Guidelines for the prevention of infectious risk – Infection”. Page 4/8, August 2008, CCLIN Sud-Est.
  2. Horan TC., et al. “CDC definitions of nosocomial surgical site infections, 1992: a modification of CDC definitions of surgical wound infections”. Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology 10 (1992): 606-608.
  3. Coudane H., et al. “Osteitis”. EMC - Musculoskeletal System 6 (2011): 1-14.
  4. Anderson DJ., et al. “Under resourced hospital infection control and prevention programs: Penny wise, pound foolish?” Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology 7 (2007): 767-773.
  5. Zubair AA., et al. “A scoping review on the management of open fractures in African trauma and orthopaedics centres”. Cureus 9 (2024): e68925.
  6. Jia T., et al. “Inadequate soft tissue coverage and bone loss/comminution are the typical risk factors of surgical site infection in open fractures of the hand: A nomogram prediction model”. PLoS ONE1 (2025): e0313832.
  7. Ahamad FU., et al. “Comparison of postoperative wound infection in controlled diabetic and non-diabetic patients in elective operations”. Journal of Dhaka Medical College 2 (2024): 226-231.
  8. Malik MHA., et al. “Factors affecting rates of infection and nonunion in intramedullary nailing”. The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (British Volume) 86-B.4 (2004): 556-560.
  9. Abalo A., et al. “Surgical site infection in orthopaedic surgery in a developing country”. Revue de Chirurgie Orthopédique et Traumatologique 1 (2010): 112-117.
  10. Bercion R., et al. “Surgical site infections in the orthopaedic surgery department of the community hospital of Bangui, Central African Republic”. Bulletin de la Société de Pathologie Exotique 3 (2007): 197-200.
  11. Rinderknecht H., et al. “Smoking impairs hematoma formation and dysregulates angiogenesis as the first steps of fracture healing”. Bioengineering5 (2022): 186.
  12. Pavan F., et al. “Does delay to theatre lead to increased infection rates in hand trauma? A retrospective cohort study”. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery - Global Open11 (2018): e2025.
  13. Soininen A., et al. “Bacteria-biomaterial interactions”. In: Trebše R (ed). Infected Total Joint Arthroplasty: The Algorithmic Approach. London: Springer (2012): 103-117.
  14. Pan Z., et al. “Material-based treatment strategies against intraosseous implant biofilm infection”. Biochemistry and Biophysics Reports 39 (2024): 101764.
  15. Idé G., et al. “Surgical site infection in orthotraumatologic surgery at CNHU-HKM of Cotonou”. Health Sciences and Disease 2 (2018).

Abdoul Kadri Moussa., et al. “Infections Related to Osteosynthesis Materials: Epidemiological and Clinical Aspects in the Ortho- pedic and Trauma Surgery Department at the Gabriel Touré University Hospital”. EC Orthopaedics 17.5 (2026): 01-06.