EC Orthopaedics

Retrospective Study Volume 15 Issue 2 - 2024

Anterior Cruciate Ligament (ACL) Reconstruction Using Hamstring Autografts Infused in vancomycin Lowers the Risk of Infection Following Surgery Without Impairing Knee Function: A Retrospective Study

Hatim Mohammed AlShareef*1, Abdulaziz Ahmed Munshi2, Hatim Adnan Almagrabi2, Ahmed Elbarbary1, Salwa Mohammed Imran3 and Wafa Mohammed4

Department of Orthopedic, King Fahad Armed Forced Hospital, Saudi Arabia, Jeddah

Facility of Medicine, Umm-AlQura University, Makkah, Saudi Arabia

Facility of Medicine, Xuzhou Medical University, Jiangsu, China

Facility of Medicine, Shandong First Medical University, Taian, China

*Corresponding Author: Hatim Mohammed AlShareef, Department of Orthopedic, King Fahad Armed Forced Hospital, Saudi Arabia, Jeddah.
Received: January 02, 2024; Published: January 29, 2024



Background: Post-operative infection after the ACL reconstruction (ACLR) is a potentially devastating post-operative complication. The patient presents with knee sepsis, pain, effusion, redness, erythema, a rise in C-reactive protein, and an increased white blood cell count. Early recognition and treatment are vital. However, prophylactic treatments can work wonders in preventing or decreasing the mortality rates associated with sepsis. This study was conducted to determine if using a vancomycin-soaked hamstring graft during ACLR can reduce the risk of post-operative infection compared to traditional prophylactic antibiotics.

Methods: A retrospective comparative study of 295 consecutive patients who had undergone ACLR within 4 years to demonstrate the effectiveness of vancomycin-soaked hamstring autograft on lowering post-operative infection versus traditional prophylactic IV antibiotics only. The patients were divided into two groups depending on pre-soaked vancomycin hamstring autograft. Both groups received pre-operative prophylactic IV antibiotics, but only group 2 (n = 60) underwent ACLR with autografts pre-soaked in 500 mL of 1-mg/mL solution of vancomycin for an average of 20 - 30 minutes. The ACLR procedures were performed by 4 sports medicine fellowship-trained orthopedic surgeons, and only one surgeon used pre-soaked vancomycin hamstring autografts (supportive for using the method of a vancomycin-soaked hamstring graft during ACL). The other three surgeons used a traditional prophylactic antibiotic only (Not supportive of using the method of a vancomycin-soaked hamstring graft during ACLR). This study was conducted retrospectively from July 2019 to July 2022 at King Fahad Armed Forced Hospital. Institutional review board approvals were obtained from the same hospital, and all patients provided informed consent for participation in the surveillance study. IRB application number (REC 609), Date: 22/August/ 2023.

Results: The present study included 295 patients, of whom (20%, n = 60) received grafts of vancomycin and (80%, n = 235) received only traditional prophylactic antibiotics. In the vancomycin-soaked group, there was no infection (0%, n = 0). While all patients who developed post-infectious disease were members of the traditional prophylactic antibiotic group (1.3%, n = 3). The value of the effect size for the Oxford scale as a whole is equal to 0.98, which indicates that there is a great effect of vancomycin-soaked hamstring autograft and anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction on improving the patient's condition. that the use of vancomycin-soaked hamstring graft during ACLR can reduce the risk of postoperative infection compared with conventional prophylactic antibiotics because sig. = 0.000 < 0.05 for the test of Mann-Whitney.

Conclusion: The current study adds to the body of literature regarding the benefits of soaking hamstring grafts in vancomycin, despite the benefits of this technique, it is not commonly used locally, further studies with larger sample sizes are needed to give further insight.

 Keywords: Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction (ACLR); Vancomycin-Soaked Hamstring Autograft; C-Reactive Protein

  1. Abram SGF., et al. “Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction and meniscal repair rates have both increased in the past 20 years in England: hospital statistics from 1997 to 2017”. British Journal of Sports Medicine5 (2020): 286-291.
  2. Moses B., et al. “Systematic review: annual incidence of ACL injury and surgery in various populations”. Research in Sports Medicine 3-4 (2012): 157-179.
  3. Waterman BR., et al. “Septic arthritis after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: clinical and functional outcomes based on graft retention or removal”. Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine 3 (2018): 2325967118758626.
  4. Gille J., et al. “Functional outcome of septic arthritis after anterior cruciate ligament surgery”. International Orthopaedics 6 (2015): 1195-1201.
  5. Bansal A., et al. “Meta-analysis of the risk of infections after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction by graft type”. American Journal of Sports Medicine 6 (2017): 1500-1508.
  6. Maletis GB., et al. “Incidence of postoperative anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction infections: graft choice makes a difference”. American Journal of Sports Medicine 8 (2013): 1780-1785.
  7. Eriksson K and Karlsson J. “Local vancomycin in ACL reconstruction: a modern rationale (2016) for morbidity prevention and patient safety”. Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy 9 (2016): 2721-2723.
  8. Brophy RH., et al. “Factors associated with infection following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction”. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, American Volume 6 (2015): 450-454.
  9. Stucken C., et al. “Infections in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction”. Sports Health6 (2013): 553-557.
  10. Rodriguez-Merchan EC and Ribbans WJ. “The role of vancomycin-soaking of the graft in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction”. Journal of ISAKOS 2 (2022): 94-98.
  11. Carrozzo A., et al. “Presoaking ACL grafts in vancomycin decreases the frequency of postoperative septic arthritis: a cohort study of 29,659 patients, systematic review, and meta-analysis from the SANTI study group”. Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine 2 (2022): 23259671211073928.
  12. Gobbi A., et al. “Postoperative infection after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction”. Sports Health2 (2016): 187-189.
  13. Antoci VJ., et al. “Antibiotics for local delivery systems cause skeletal cell toxicity in vitro”. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research 462 (2007): 200-206.
  14. Naendrup J-H., et al. “Vancomycin-soaking of the graft reduces the incidence of septic arthritis following ACL reconstruction: results of a systematic review and meta-analysis”. Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy 4 (2020): 1005-1013.
  15. Figueroa F., et al. “Vancomycin presoaking of the graft appears to prevent infection after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis”. HSS Journal 1 (2022): 138-144.
  16. Baron JE., et al. “Graft preparation with intraoperative vancomycin decreases infection after ACL reconstruction: a review of 1,640 cases”. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, American Volume 24 (2019): 2187-2193.
  17. Horii C., et al. “Does intrawound vancomycin powder reduce surgical site infection after posterior instrumented spinal surgery? A propensity score-matched analysis”. Spine Journal12 (2018): 2205-2212.

Hatim Mohammed AlShareef., et al. "Anterior Cruciate Ligament (ACL) Reconstruction Using Hamstring Autografts Infused in vancomycin Lowers the Risk of Infection Following Surgery Without Impairing Knee Function: A Retrospective Study." EC Orthopaedics 15.2 (2024): 01-07.