Review Article Volume 17 Issue 11 - 2025

The Placenta as Sacred Interface: Integrating Contemporary Science, Ancient Mythology, and Embodied Theology to Reimagine the Doctor-Patient Relationship

Julian Ungar-Sargon MD PhD*

Borra College of Health Sciences, Dominican University, River Forest, Illinois, USA

*Corresponding Author: Julian Ungar-Sargon MD PhD, Borra College of Health Sciences, Dominican University, River Forest, Illinois, USA.
Received: October 13, 2025; Published: October 28, 2025



The placenta represents a profound convergence of biological, mythological, and theological significance that remains largely unexplored in contemporary medical practice. Recent advances in placental research (2023-2025) reveal this organ as a dynamic neuroendocrine, immunological, and metabolic interface that governs maternal-fetal communication and shapes lifelong health trajectories. Concurrently, cross-cultural anthropological evidence demonstrates that diverse ancient civilizations recognized the placenta as a living entity worthy of reverence, conceptualizing it variously as twin soul, guardian angel, and cosmic creative force. This discursive essay synthesizes cutting-edge placental science with ancient mythological wisdom and the embodied theological framework of tzimtzum (divine contraction) to propose a transformative model for clinical practice.

The historical trajectory of placental understanding-from Galenic errors through Renaissance anatomical discoveries to contemporary molecular insights-itself demonstrates the placental principle: knowledge emerges at interfaces, through encounter between different ways of knowing. By examining the placenta as both biological reality and sacred archetype, this work argues that the doctor-patient relationship itself functions as a liminal interface where healing occurs through embodied presence rather than technical intervention alone. The integration of these three domains-empirical science, mythological intuition, and theological reflection-offers a paradigmatic shift from mechanistic medicine toward what may be termed "placental medicine": a relational, adaptive, reverent approach that honors the sacred dimensions of embodied existence while maintaining scientific rigor. This synthesis has immediate clinical applications for maternal-fetal medicine, pain management, and the broader therapeutic encounter, suggesting that authentic healing requires physicians to practice a form of tzimtzum-creating space through self-limitation that allows the patient's inherent wisdom to emerge.

 Keywords: Placenta; Embodied Theology; Tzimtzum; Doctor-Patient Relationship; Maternal-Fetal Medicine; Sacred Healing; Medical Anthropology; Neuroendocrine Interface; Embodied Cognition; Therapeutic Presence; Medical History; Comparative Placentology

  1. Ungar-Sargon J. “Worn out philosophical ideas still pervade the practice of medicine: the Cartesian split lives on”. International Journal of Physical Medication and Rehabilitation 3 (2024): 1-10.
  2. Ungar-Sargon J. “Beyond chemical reductionism: how new depression research supports embodied medicine”. American Journal of Medical and Clinical Research and Reviews 8 (2025): 1-17.
  3. Young SM and Benyshek DC. “In search of human placentophagy: a cross-cultural survey of human placenta consumption, disposal practices, and cultural beliefs”. Ecology of Food and Nutrition 6 (2010): 467-484.
  4. Longo LD and Reynolds LP. “Some historical aspects of understanding placental development, structure and function”. International Journal of Developmental Biology 2-3 (2010): 237-255.
  5. Ploss HH., et al. “Woman: an historical, gynaecological and anthropological compendium”. (Ed. EJ Dingwall). London: W Heinemann (1935).
  6. Stirrat GM. “The bundle of life - the placenta in ancient history and modern science”. In: The Yearbook of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. (Ed. PM Shaughn O'Brien). Volume 6. London: Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (1998): 1-14.
  7. Pique-Regi R., et al. “A single-cell atlas of the maternal-fetal interface”. Nature (2024).
  8. Burton GJ and Charnock-Jones DS. “Placental vascular remodeling and disease”. Placenta (2023).
  9. Guthrie P. “Many cultures revere placenta, byproduct of childbirth”. Cox News Service (1999).
  10. Long CE. “The placenta in lore and legend”. Bulletin of The Medical Library Association 2 (1963): 233-241.
  11. Corner GW. “Exploring the placental maze. The development of our knowledge of the relation between the bloodstreams of mother and infant in utero”. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 86 (1963): 408-418.
  12. Ungar-Sargon J. “Epistemology versus ontology in therapeutic practice: the tzimtzum model and doctor-patient relationships”. Advanced Medical and Clinical Research 1 (2025): 94-101.
  13. Ungar-Sargon J. “Divine presence and concealment in the therapeutic space”. EC Neurology5 (2025): 01-13.
  14. “Opera, edidit Academia Regia Borussica”. 5 volumes. Berlin: Reimer (1831-1870).
  15. Galenus C. “Opera Omnia. Corpus Medicorum Graecorum V”. Berlin: Akademie-Verlag (1914).
  16. Da Vinci L. “Quaderni D'anatomia”. Volume III. Fogli della Royal Library di Windsor, Organi della Generazione, Embrione. (Eds. CL Vangensten, AM Fonahn, H Hopstock). Christiania: J Dybwad (1913).
  17. O'Malley CD and Saunders CM. “Leonardo da Vinci on the human body”. New York: Henry Schuman (1952).
  18. Vesalius A. “De humani corporis fabrica libri septum”. Basel: ex officina Ioannis Oporini (1543).
  19. Vesalius A. “De humani corporis fabrica libri septum”. Basel: J Oporinus (1555).
  20. Aranzi GC. De humano foetu libellus. Bologna: Ex officina Joannis Rubrii (1564).
  21. Harvey W. “Exercitatio anatomica de motu cordis et sanguinis in animalibus”. Frankfurt: sumpt Guilielmi Fitzeri (1628).
  22. Harvey W. “Anatomical exercitations, concerning the generation of living creatures”. London: Printed by James Young (1653).
  23. Barron DH. “A history of fetal respiration: From Harvey's Question (1651) to Zweifel's Answer (1876)”. In: Fetal and Newborn Cardiovascular Physiology. Volume 1, Developmental aspects. (Eds. LD Longo, DD Reneau). New York: Garland STPM Press (1978): 1-32.
  24. Mayow J. “Tractatus quinque medico-physici”. Oxford: E Theatro Sheldoniano (1674).
  25. Monro A. “An essay on the nutrition of foetuses”. Edinburgh Medical Ess Observed 2 (1734): 121-224.
  26. Hunter W. “Anatomia uteri humani gravidi tabulis illustrata”. London: Prostant apud S Baker, T Cadell, D Wilson, T Nicol, and J Murray (1774).
  27. Hunter W. “An anatomical description of the human gravid uterus, and its contents”. (Ed. M Baillie). London: J Johnson and G Nicol (1794).
  28. Kaufmann P and Frank H-G. “Placental development”. In: Fetal and Neonatal Physiology. Volume 1, 3rd (Eds. RA Polin, WW Fox, SH Abman). Philadelphia: Saunders Co. (2004): 85-97.
  29. Burton GJ and Charnock-Jones DS. “Placental vascular remodeling and disease”. Placenta (2023).
  30. St-Pierre J., et al. “Endocrine pathways linking placenta and fetal brain development”. Cell Metabolism (2024).
  31. Exton AE, et al. “Artificial placenta systems and fetal physiology”. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology (2025).
  32. Seligmann CG and Murray MA. “Note upon an early Egyptian standard”. Man. Volume 11. London: Royal Anthropological Society of Great Britain and Ireland (1911): 165-171.
  33. Ben-Senior L. “Cultural beliefs honor placenta [Internet]”. Parents Guide Cord Blood (2020).
  34. Cassidy T. “The rebirth of placenta rituals”. Sapiens (2023).
  35. Ungar-Sargon J. “The science of interoception and unconscious bias in healthcare: a call for embodied clinical practice”. Neurology and Neuroscience 6 (2025): 026.
  36. Southcombe JH., et al. “Extracellular vesicle signaling at the maternal-fetal interface”. Frontiers in Immunology (2024).
  37. Ungar-Sargon J. “A framework for transformative healthcare practice”. American Journal of Medical and Clinical Research and Reviews 7 (2025): 1-40.
  38. Marsit CJ. “Placental epigenome as a mediator of environmental programming”. Nature Reviews Endocrinology (2025).
  39. Ben-Senior L. “Cultural beliefs honor placenta”. Parents Guide Cord Blood (2020).
  40. Turco MY and Moffett A. “Placental organoids and early human development”. Developmental Cell (2025).
  41. Helsel DG and Mochel M. “Afterbirths in the afterlife: cultural meaning of placental disposal in a Hmong American community”. Journal of Transcultural Nursing 4 (2002): 282-286.
  42. Longo LD. “Socio-cultural practices relating to obstetrics and gynecology in a community of West Africa”. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 4 (1964): 470-475.
  43. Ungar-Sargon J. “Divine presence and concealment in the therapeutic space”. EC Neurology5 (2025): 01-13.
  44. Griaule M and Dieterlen G. “The Dogon”. In: African worlds: studies in the cosmological ideas and social values of African peoples. London: Oxford University Press (1954).
  45. Mackenzie DA. “Scottish wonder tales from myth and legend”. New York: Dover Publications (1997).
  46. Andrews T. “Dictionary of nature myths: legends of the earth, sea, and sky”. Oxford: Oxford University Press (2000).
  47. Lawlor R. “Voices of the first day: awakening in the Aboriginal dreamtime”. Rochester: Inner Traditions (1991).
  48. Republic of Turkey Ministry of Culture and Tourism. Birth traditions [Internet]. Ankara: Ministry of Culture and Tourism (2025).
  49. Official Website of the National Department for Culture and Arts, Ministry of Tourism Malaysia. Malay community [Internet]. Kuala Lumpur: Ministry of Tourism (2025).
  50. Ungar-Sargon J. “Archetypal and embodied approaches to medical practice: a critical analysis of challenges to biomedical orthodoxy”. Journal of Psychology and Neuroscience 3 (2025): 1-16.
  51. Scholem G. “Major trends in Jewish mysticism”. New York: Schocken Books (1995).
  52. Scholem G. “Kabbalah”. Jerusalem: Keter Publishing House (1974).
  53. Luzzatto MC. “Derech Hashem (The way of God)”. Jerusalem: Feldheim Publishers (1997).
  54. Schneerson MM. “Hemshech Samech Vav”. Brooklyn: Kehot Publication Society (1906).
  55. Loewenthal N. “Communicating the infinite: the emergence of the Habad school”. Chicago: University of Chicago Press (1990).
  56. Ungar-Sargon J. “Primordial silence and therapeutic presence: theodicy and the paradox of divine concealment in clinical practice”. Biomedical Science and Clinical Research 2 (2025): 01-10.
  57. Ungar-Sargon J. “Insubstantial language and the space between healer and patient”. International Journal of Psychiatry Research 2 (2025): 1-13.
  58. Ungar-Sargon J. “Sacred utterances: terminal utterances and the embodied theology of medical practice”. Journal of Clinical Review and Case Reports 8 (2025): 1-7.
  59. Ungar-Sargon J. “From medical orthodoxy to dialogical practice: applying theological models of creative engagement to contemporary healthcare”. Advance Medical and Clinical Research 4 (2024): 1-18.
  60. Ungar-Sargon J. “Transforming healthcare hierarchical systems through token economy interventions: a behavioral approach to organizational change”. Trends in General Medicine 2 (2025): 1-9.
  61. Ungar-Sargon J. “Between illness and health: what happened to convalescence?” Dominican University (2024).
  62. Ungar-Sargon J. “Beyond theodicy: the physician's existential crisis”. Advance Medical and Clinical Research 1 (2025): 102-105.
  63. Ungar-Sargon J. “The dialectical divine: tzimtzum and the parabolic theology of human suffering”. Journal of Religion and Theology 2 (2024): 1-45.
  64. Ungar-Sargon J. “Prolonged grief disorder: treatment approaches and the spiritual dimensions of healing”. Addiction Research 1 (2025): 1-7.
  65. Ungar-Sargon J. “The patient history-reimagining the body in illness”. Dominican University (2024).
  66. McDonald SJ., et al. “Effect of timing of umbilical cord clamping of term infants on maternal and neonatal outcomes”. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 7 (2013): CD004074.
  67. Heazell AE., et al. “Research priorities for stillbirth: process overview and results from UK Stillbirth Priority Setting Partnership”. Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology 6 (2015): 641-647.
  68. Farmer P. “Pathologies of power: health, human rights, and the new war on the poor”. Berkeley: University of California Press (2003).
  69. Bailey ZD., et al. “Structural racism and health inequities in the USA: evidence and interventions”. Lancet 10077 (2017): 1453-1463.
  70. Scheper-Hughes N. “The primacy of the ethical: propositions for a militant anthropology”. Current Anthropology 3 (1995): 409-440.
  71. Ungar-Sargon J. “Patient autonomy and co-creation: evidence-based approaches to designing healing environments”. Journal of Psychology and Neuroscience 1 (2025): 1-12.
  72. Ungar-Sargon J. “Reclaiming the sacred in medicine: toward an integration of ancient wisdom and modern science in healthcare”. Journal of Behavioral Health 3 (2024): 1-15.
  73. Ungar-Sargon J. “Chesed and Gevurah and the Tzimtzum-between mercy and judgment in the theology of healing”. Journal of Psychology and Neuroscience 3 (2025): 1-12.

Julian Ungar-Sargon MD PhD. “The Placenta as Sacred Interface: Integrating Contemporary Science, Ancient Mythology, and Embodied Theology to Reimagine the Doctor-Patient Relationship”. EC Neurology  17.11 (2025): 01-22.