Review Article Volume 18 Issue 8 - 2026

The Element α Hypothesis: An Integrative Model of Brain Functioning, Consciousness, and Mental Activity

Meyara Sidi Mohamed*, Seyedena Ali Taleb Elwavi, Noukhoum Koné and Salihy Sidi Mohamed

PhD in Medicine and Surgery from the University of Barcelona and Specialist in Radiodiagnosis and Neuroradiology at Bellvitge University Hospital and Graduated in Religious Sciences from the University of Navarra, Spain

*Corresponding Author: Amadeo Muntané Sánchez, Passatge Josep Gelabert, 2, 1º-1ª, 08940-Cornellà, Barcelona, Spain.
Received: July 29, 2026;; Published: August 19, 2026



Understanding the relationship between brain activity and conscious experience continues to be one of the main challenges of contemporary neuroscience. Although advances in neuroanatomy, neurophysiology, and neuroimaging have made it possible to ex- plain numerous mechanisms involved in perception, memory, language, and behavior, open questions remain related to subjective experience, intellect, will, and personal identity. In this work, the hypothesis of Element α is proposed as a conceptual model of functional integration intended to complement, without replace, consolidated neurobiological knowledge. The hypothesis states that mental activity arises from a unique functional system constituted by the brain and Element α, whose interaction would occur through a continuous exchange of functional information called Information I. This approach rejects both a substantial dualism and an exclusively physicalist reduction, proposing a unitary organization in which the neural processes and the functional dimension of the Element α constitute a single act. The epistemological foundations of the proposal are analyzed, its compatibility with current scientific knowledge, its integrating capacity with respect to different contemporary theories of consciousness and the criteria that it should meet as a scientific hypothesis. Likewise, conceptual predictions are formulated, its limitations are recognized and possible lines of research that could contribute to its future empirical evaluation are pointed out. The model aims to offer a theoretical frame- work to stimulate new approaches to the study of consciousness and mental activity, maintaining a necessarily provisional character and open to revision as scientific knowledge advances.

Keywords: Consciousness; Brain; Neuroscience; Philosophy of Mind; Scientific Hypothesis; Element α; Information; Cognition; Mental Activity

  1. Kandel ER., et al. “Principles of neural science. 6th edition”. New York: McGraw-Hill (2021).
  2. Purves D., et al. “Neuroscience. 6th edition”. New York: Oxford University Press (2018).
  3. Markram H., et al. “Introducing the human brain project”. Procedia Computer Science 7 (2011): 39-42.
  4. Amunts K., et al. “The Human Brain Project: Synergy between neuroscience, computing, informatics, and brain-inspired technologies”. PLoS Biology7 (2019): e3000344.
  5. Damasio A. “Self comes to mind: Constructing the conscious brain”. New York: Pantheon Books (2010).
  6. Andersen RA and Cui H. “Intention, action planning, and decision making in parietal-frontal circuits”. Neuron 5 (2009): 568-583.
  7. Hochberg LR., et al. “Reach and grasp by people with tetraplegia using a neurally controlled robotic arm”. Nature 7398 (2012): 372-375.
  8. Russell SJ and Norvig P. “Artificial intelligence: A modern approach. 4th edition”. Hoboken (NJ): Pearson (2021).
  9. Goodfellow I., et al. “Deep learning”. Cambridge (MA): MIT Press (2016).
  10. Turing AM. “Computing machinery and intelligence”. Mind 236 (1950): 433-460.
  11. Searle JR. “Minds, brains, and programs”. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 3 (1980): 417-457.
  12. Penrose R. “The emperor's new mind”. Oxford: Oxford University Press (1989).
  13. Penrose R. “Shadows of the mind”. Oxford: Oxford University Press (1994).
  14. Sporns O., et al. “The human connectome: A structural description of the human brain”. PLOS Computational Biology 4 (2005): e42.
  15. Sporns O. “Networks of the brain”. Cambridge (MA): MIT Press (2011).
  16. Friederici AD. “The brain basis of language processing: From structure to function”. Physiological Reviews 4 (2011): 1357-1392.
  17. Vygotsky LS. “Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes”. Cambridge (MA): Harvard University Press (1978).
  18. Dehaene S. “How we learn: Why brains learn better than any machine... for Now”. New York: Viking (2020).
  19. Island TR. “Rethinking schizophrenia”. Nature7321 (2010): 187-193.
  20. Lezak MD., et al. “Neuropsychological Assessment. 5th edition”. New York: Oxford University Press (2012).
  21. Nestler EJ., et al. “Neurobiology of depression”. Neuron1 (2002): 13-25.
  22. Malhi GS and Mann JJ. “Depression”. Lancet 10161 (2018): 2299-2312.
  23. Harlow JM. “Recovery from the passage of an iron bar through the head”. Massachusetts Medical Society 2 (1868): 327-347.
  24. Damasio H., et al. “The return of Phineas Gage: Clues about the brain from the skull of a famous patient”. Science 5162 (1994): 1102-1105.
  25. Damasio AR. “Descartes' error: Emotion, reason, and the human brain”. New York: Putnam (1994).
  26. LeDoux J. “Synaptic self: How our brains become who we are”. New York: Viking (2002).
  27. Pinker S. “How the Mind Works”. New York: W.W. Norton & Company (1997).
  28. Churchland PM. “Matter and consciousness. Rev ed”. Cambridge (MA): MIT Press (1988).
  29. Crick F. “The astonishing hypothesis: The scientific search for the soul”. New York: Scribner (1994).
  30. Smart JJC. “Sensations and brain processes”. Philosophical Review 2 (1959): 141-156.
  31. Armstrong DM. “A materialist theory of the mind”. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul (1968).
  32. Searle JR. “The rediscovery of the mind”. Cambridge (MA): MIT Press (1992).
  33. Putnam H. “Psychological predicates”. In: Capitan WH, Merrill DD, editors. Art, Mind, and Religion. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press (1967): 37-48.
  34. Fodor JA. “The language of thought”. Cambridge (MA): Harvard University Press (1975).
  35. Cabeza R and Nyberg L. “Imaging cognition II: An empirical review of 275 PET and fMRI studies”. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 1 (2000): 1-47.
  36. Dehaene S., et al. “Three parietal circuits for number processing”. Cognitive Neuropsychology 3-6 (2003): 487-506.
  37. Owen AM., et al. “N-back working memory paradigm: A meta-analysis of normative functional neuroimaging studies”. Human Brain Mapping 1 (2005): 46-59.
  38. Bush G., et al. “Functional neuroimaging of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder”. Biological Psychiatry 11 (2005): 1273-1284.
  39. Rubia K. “Cognitive neuroscience of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder”. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences 22 (2018): 22-27.
  40. Gazzaniga MS., et al. “Cognitive neuroscience: The biology of the mind. 5th edition”. New York: W.W. Norton & Company (2019).
  41. Popper KR and Eccles JC. “The self and its brain”. Berlin: Springer-Verlag (1977).
  42. Eccles JC. “How the self controls its brain”. Berlin: Springer-Verlag (1994).
  43. Sheldrake R. “The science delusion”. London: Coronet (2012).
  44. Laureys S. “The neural correlate of (un)awareness: Lessons from the vegetative state”. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 12 (2005): 556-559.
  45. Schiff ND. “Recovery of consciousness after brain injury”. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (2015).
  46. Chalmers DJ. “The conscious mind: In search of a fundamental theory”. New York: Oxford University Press (1996).
  47. Koch C. “The feeling of life itself: Why consciousness is widespread but can't be computed”. Cambridge (MA): MIT Press (2019).
  48. De Anima.
  49. Thomas Aquinas. Summa Theologiae.
  50. Polo L. “Course on theory of knowledge”. Vols. I-IV. Pamplona: EUNSA (1999).
  51. Thomas Aquinas. By Veritate.
  52. Yepes Stork R. “Fundamentals of anthropology. 4th edition”. Pamplona: EUNSA (1996).
  53. Bear MF., et al. “Neuroscience: Exploring the Brain. 4th edition”. Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer (2020).
  54. Dehaene S. “Consciousness and the brain: Deciphering how the brain codes our thoughts”. New York: Viking (2014).
  55. Nagel T. “What is it like to be a bat?” Philosophical Review 4 (1974): 435-450.
  56. Penfield W and Rasmussen T. “The cerebral cortex of man”. New York: Macmillan (1950).
  57. Penfield W. “The mystery of the mind”. Princeton (NJ): Princeton University Press (1975).
  58. Wegner DM. “The illusion of conscious will”. Cambridge (MA): MIT Press (2002).
  59. Libet B., et al. “Time of conscious intention to act in relation to onset of cerebral activity (readiness-potential)”. Brain3 (1983): 623-642.
  60. Soon CS., et al. “Unconscious determinants of free decisions in the human brain”. Nature Neuroscience5 (2008): 543-545.
  61. Schurger A., et al. “An accumulator model for spontaneous neural activity prior to self-initiated movement”. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 42 (2012): E2904-E2913.
  62. Rodríguez Duplá L. “Ethics”. Madrid: Biblioteca de Autores Cristianos (2002).
  63. Moll J., et al. “The neural correlates of moral sensitivity: a functional magnetic resonance imaging investigation of basic and moral emotions”. Journal of Neuroscience7 (2002): 2730-2736.
  64. Greene JD., et al. “The neural bases of cognitive conflict and control in moral judgment”. Neuron 2 (2004): 389-400.
  65. Muntané-Sánchez A. “Neurons and values”. Revista de Neurologia1 (2014).
  66. Tononi G., et al. “Integrated information theory: from consciousness to its physical substrate”. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 7 (2016): 450-461.
  67. Glasser O. “Wilhelm Conrad Röntgen and the early history of the roentgen rays”. Novato (CA): Norman Publishing (1993).
  68. Changeux JP. “Neuronal man: The biology of mind”. New York: Pantheon Books (1985).
  69. Geschwind N. “Disconnection syndromes in animals and man. Part I”. Brain2 (1965): 237-294.
  70. Heilman KM. “Clinical Neuropsychology. 5th edition”. In: Heilman KM, Valenstein E, editors. New York: Oxford University Press (2012).
  71. Geschwind N. “The organization of language and the brain”. Science3961 (1970): 940-944.
  72. Damasio AR. “Aphasia”. New England Journal of Medicine8 (1992): 531-539.
  73. Hillis AE. “Aphasia: progress in the last quarter of a century”. Neurology2 (2007): 200-213.
  74. Kapur S. “Psychosis as a state of aberrant salience”. American Journal of Psychiatry 1 (2003): 13-23.
  75. Howes OD. “The dopamine hypothesis of schizophrenia: version III”. Schizophrenia Bulletin 3 (2009): 549-562.
  76. Stahl SM. Stahl’s Essential Psychopharmacology 5th Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (2021).
  77. Crick F. “The astonishing hypothesis: The scientific search for the soul”. New York: Scribner (1994).
  78. Tononi G. “An information integration theory of consciousness”. BMC Neuroscience 5 (2004): 42.
  79. Dehaene S. “Consciousness and the brain”. New York: Viking (2014).
  80. Popper KR. “The logic of scientific discovery”. London: Routledge (2002).
  81. Lakatos I. “The methodology of scientific research programmes”. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (1978).
  82. Bunge M. “Scientific research”. Berlin: Springer (1967).

Amadeo Muntané Sánchez. “The Element α Hypothesis: An Integrative Model of Brain Functioning, Consciousness, and Mental Activity”. EC Neurology 18.8 (2026): 01-25.