Research Article Volume 17 Issue 11 - 2025

Neurocognitive Training Upon a Diagnosed Cognitive Decline/Dementia Population in a Clinical Setting Ongoing Study Since 2012

Barbara C Fisher*, Danielle Szokola and Sofia Guevara

United Psychological Services, United States

*Corresponding Author: Barbara C Fisher, United Psychological Services, United States.
Received: October 07, 2025; Published: November 10, 2025



This study has been ongoing since 2011, established in an outpatient clinical setting. The program is individually designed based upon neuropsychological evaluation and each plan is patient specific based upon NP testing. Neurocognitive training occurred in the context of psychotherapy session addressing behavioral health issues as well as related neurological and neuropsychological deficits and concerns. Re-evaluation was completed, using the same testing at the same time of day after one year of treatment to ascertain changes and determine efficacy of the program. The study consisted of 159 patients referred by their treating physician, neurologist or specialist, diagnosed primarily with memory deficits related to mild to moderate cognitive decline, however there were some cases of moderate to severe decline and early dementia. Educational level ranged from high school to graduate degrees. Findings indicate that numerous areas of memory function improved neurocognitive function delivered in the context of a therapy session addressing all aspects of the individual’s behavioral health. The individualized program appears to be effective in enhancing memory function in a clinical outpatient population of varying degrees and types of dementia and cognitive decline.

 Keywords: Neurocognitive Training; Cognitive Decline; Dementia Population

  1. Shah TM., et al. “Enhancing cognitive functioning in healthy older adults a systemic review of the clinical significance of commercially available computerized cognitive training in preventing cognitive decline”. Neuropsychological Review1 (2017): 62-80.
  2. Moruzzi., et al. “Randomized trial on the effects of a combined physical/cognitive training in aged MCI subjects: the Train the Brain study”. Scientific Reports 7 (2017): 39471.
  3. Ngandu T., et al. “A 2 year multidomain intervention of diet, exercise, cognitive training, and vascular risk monitoring versus control to prevent cognitive decline in at risk elderly people (FINGER) a randomized controlled trial”. Lancet 9984 (2015): 2255-2263.
  4. Valenzuela M and Sachdev P. “Can cognitive exercise prevent the onset of dementia? Systematic review of randomized clinical trials with longitudinal follow-up”. American Journal of Psychiatry3 (2009): 179-187.
  5. Turnbull A., et al. “Unifying framework for cognitive training interventions in brain aging”. Ageing Research Reviews 81 (2022): 101724.
  6. Kuster Olivia C., et al. “Cognitive change is more positively associated with an active lifestyle than with training interventions in older adults at risk for dementia, a controlled intervention clinical trial”. BMC Psychiatry1 (2016): 315.
  7. Chapman Sandra B., et al. “Distinct brain and behavioral benefits from cognitive vs. physical training: a randomized trial in aging adults”. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 10 (2016): 338.
  8. Van Muljden Jesse., et al. “Online games training aging brains limited transfer to cognitive control functions”. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 6 (2012): 221.
  9. Ballesteros Soledad., et al. “Brain training with non-action video games enhances aspects of cognition in older adults, a randomized controlled trial”. Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience 6 (2014): 227.
  10. Baniqued Pauline., et al. “Cognitive training with casual video games points to consider”. Frontiers in Psychology 4 (2014): 1010.
  11. Gavelin HM., et al. “Combined physical and cognitive training for older adults with and without cognitive impairment: A systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials”. Ageing Research Reviews 66 (2021): 101232.
  12. Gozdas E., et al. “Long-term cognitive training enhances fluid cognition and brain connectivity in individuals with MCI”. Translational Psychiatry 1 (2024): 447.
  13. Paggetti A., et al. “The efficacy of cognitive stimulation, cognitive training, and cognitive rehabilitation for people living with dementia: a systematic review and meta-analysis”. Geroscience1 (2025): 409-444.
  14. Alan D Baddeley., et al. “Doors and People: A Test of Visual and Verbal Recall and Recognition”. Manual (1994).
  15. Duff Kevin. “Demographically-corrected normative data for the Hopkins verbal learning test-revised and brief visuospatial memory test-revised in an elderly sample”. Applied Neuropsychology: Adult 3 (2016): 179-185.
  16. Fisher BC and Szokola D. “The efficacy of neurocognitive training upon a diagnosed mild cognitive decline/dementia population in a clinical setting: Ongoing study since 2011”. Neurol Sci J1 (2018): 1-4.
  17. Duff K., et al. “Predicting change with the RBANS in an elderly sample”. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society 6 (2004): 828-834.
  18. Wilson BA., et al. “Improvement or simply practice? The effects of twenty repeated assessments on people with and without brain injury”. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society 4 (2000): 469-479.
  19. Mac Pherson SE., et al. “The doors and people test: the effect of frontal lobe lesions on recall and recognition memory performance”. Neuropsychology3 (2016): 332-337.

Barbara C Fisher., et al. “Neurocognitive Training Upon a Diagnosed Cognitive Decline/Dementia Population in a Clinical Setting Ongoing Study Since 2012”. EC Neurology  17.12 (2025): 01-07.