EC Neurology

Review Article Volume 17 Issue 7 - 2025

Multi-Locus Pro-Dopaminergic Restoration of Reward Brain Circuitry in Reward Deficiency Rescinds Mono-Pharmaceutical Targeting

Kenneth Blum1-4, Kavya Mohankumar3, Debasis Bagchi5, Kai Uwe Lewandrowski4,6, Alireza Sharafshah7, Igor Elman2,8, Mark S Gold9, Catherine A Dennen10, Panayotis K Thanos11, Albert Pinhasov2, Abdalla Bowirrat2, Alexander PL Lewandrowski12, David Baron1,13, Edward J Modestino14, Brian Fuehrlein15, Jag Khalsa16, Daniel Gastelu3, Chynna Fliegelman17, Keerthy Sunder1, Kevin T Murphy18, Milan Makale19, Margaret A Madigan3, Marco Lindenau3, Anand Swaroop3 and Rajendra D Badgaiyan20,21*

1Center for Exercise and Sport Mental Health, Western University Health Sciences, Pomona, USA 2Department of Molecular Biology, Adelson School of Medicine, Ariel University, Ariel, Israel 3Division of Clinical Neurological Research, The Kenneth Blum Neurogenetic and Behavioral Institute, Austin, USA 4Division of Personalized Pain Therapy Research, Center for Advanced Spine Care of Southern Arizona, Tucson, USA 5Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, College of Pharmacy, Texas Southern University, Houston, TX, USA 6Department of Surgery, Arizonia University School of Medicine, Tucson, AZ, USA 7Cellular and Molecular Research Center, School of Medicine, Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Rasht, Iran 8Department of Psychiatry, Harvard School of Medicine, Cambridge, USA 9Department of Psychiatry, Washington University, School of Medicine, St. Louis, USA 10Department of Family Medicine, Jefferson Health Northeast, Philadelphia, USA 11Behavioral Neuropharmacology and Neuroimaging Laboratory on Addictions, Research Institute on Addictions, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, USA 12Department of Biological Sciences, Dornsife College of Letters, Arts and Sciences, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA 13Department of Psychiatry, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA., USA 14Brain and Behavior Laboratory, Department of Psychology, Curry College, Milton, USA 15Department of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, USA 16Department of Medicine, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, USA 17Department of Psychology, St. John’s University, Queens, NYC, NY, USA 18Division of Personalized Neuromodulation, PeakLogic, LLC., Del MAR, CA, USA 19Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, UC San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA 20Department of Psychiatry, Texas Tech University, Health Sciences, School of Medicine, Midland, TX, USA 21Department of Psychiatry, Mt. Sinai University, Ichan School of Medicine, New York, USA

*Corresponding Author: Rajendra D Badgaiyan, Department of Psychiatry, Texas Tech University, Health Sciences, School of Medicine, Midland, TX and Department of Psychiatry, Mt. Sinai University, Ichan School of Medicine, New York, USA.
Received: May 26, 2025; Published: June 13, 2025



Dopaminergic dysfunction in reward circuitry is well-documented as a contributor to addictive behaviors. Evidence indicates that changes in synchronous neural activity between brain regions mediating reward and cognitive functions may significantly contribute to substance-related disorders. In this commentary we highlight findings showing that the pro-dopaminergic nutraceutical (KB220) enhances functional connectivity between reward and cognitive brain areas in both animal and human studies. Animal studies demonstrate that KB220 activates important brain reward-related regions, including the nucleus accumbens, anterior cingulate gyrus, anterior thalamic nuclei, hippocampus, and prelimbic and infralimbic loci. Kb220 induced significant functional connectivity, enhanced neuroplasticity, and improved dopaminergic functionality within the brain reward circuitry with effects localized to these regions rather than broader distributed across the brain. In abstinent heroin-dependent individuals, acute KB220 administration significantly induced BOLD activation in caudate-accumbens dopaminergic pathways relative to placebo. Furthermore, data from 36 clinical trials and preclinical studies encompassing over 1,000 subjects, demonstrate that KB220 supports “dopamine homeostasis” across various reward deficiency behaviors. Clinical outcomes and quantitative electroencephalogy (qEEG) results underscore KB220’s potential anti-craving/anti-relapse effects in addiction and other psychiatric disorders through direct or indirect dopaminergic modulation. Based on a review of the existing knowledge and further intensive investigation, we propose that instead of relying on mono-pharmaceutical approaches, the scientific community should endorse multi-loci dopaminergic restoration of reward brain circuitry as a fundamental paradigm for addressing mental illness.

 Keywords: Quantitative Electroencephalogy (qEEG); KB220; Reward Deficiency (RD); Genome-Wide Association Studies (GWAS); Alcohol Use Disorder (AUD)

  1. Gold MS., et al. “Molecular role of dopamine in anhedonia linked to reward deficiency syndrome (RDS) and anti- reward systems”. Frontiers in Bioscience (Scholar Edition) 2 (2018): 309-325.
  2. Li Z., et al. “Inheritance of neural substrates for motivation and pleasure”. Psychological Science 8 (2019): 1205-1217.
  3. Blum K., et al. “Reward deficiency syndrome: a biogenetic model for the diagnosis and treatment of impulsive, addictive, and compulsive behaviors”. Journal of Psychoactive Drugs i-iv (2000): 1-112.
  4. Kotyuk E., et al. “Co-occurrences of substance use and other potentially addictive behaviors: Epidemiological results from the psychological and genetic factors of the addictive behaviors (PGA) study”. Journal of Behavioral Addictions 2 (2020): 272-288.
  5. McLellan AT., et al. “Preaddiction-A missing concept for treating substance use disorders”. JAMA Psychiatry8 (2022): 749-751.
  6. Blum K., et al. “"Preaddiction" construct and reward deficiency syndrome: genetic link via dopaminergic dysregulation”. Annals of Translational Medicine 21 (2022): 1181.
  7. Blum K., et al. “Introducing precision addiction management of reward deficiency syndrome, the construct that underpins all addictive behaviors”. Frontiers in Psychiatry 9 (2018): 548.
  8. Brand M., et al. “Current advances in behavioral addictions: from fundamental research to clinical practice”. American Journal of Psychiatry 2 (2024): 155-163.
  9. Celorrio D., et al. “Influence of dopaminergic system genetic variation and lifestyle factors on excessive alcohol consumption”. Alcohol3 (2016): 258-267.
  10. Blum K., et al. “Identification of stress-induced epigenetic methylation onto dopamine D2 gene and neurological and behavioral consequences”. Gene, Protein and Disease 1 (2024).
  11. Klimkiewicz A., et al. “COMT and BDNF gene variants help to predict alcohol consumption in alcohol-dependent patients”. Journal of Addiction Medicine 2 (2017): 114-118.
  12. Nasello C., et al. “Human mutations in high-confidence Tourette disorder genes affect sensorimotor behavior, reward learning, and striatal dopamine in mice”. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 19 (2024): e2307156121.
  13. Kim HD., et al. “SIRT1 coordinates transcriptional regulation of neural activity and modulates depression-like behaviors in the nucleus accumbens”. Biological Psychiatry 6 (2024): 495-505.
  14. Treutlein J., et al. “DNAJC13 influences responses of the extended reward system to conditioned stimuli: a genome-wide association study”. European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience 2 (2024): 499-510.
  15. Blankenship HE., et al. “VTA dopamine neurons are hyperexcitable in 3xTg-AD mice due to casein kinase 2-dependent SK channel dysfunction”. Nature Communications 1 (2024): 9673.
  16. Deak JD., et al. “Genetics of alcohol use disorder: a review”. Current Opinion in Psychology 27 (2019): 56-61.
  17. Chen AB., et al. “Functional 3'-UTR variants identify regulatory mechanisms impacting alcohol use disorder and related traits”. bioRxiv [Preprint] 5 (2024).
  18. Sheerin CM., et al. “Examining interactions between polygenic scores and interpersonal trauma exposure on alcohol consumption and use disorder in an ancestrally diverse college cohort”. Frontiers in Genetics 14 (2024): 1274381.
  19. Mignogna KM., et al. “Identification of novel genetic loci and candidate genes for progressive ethanol consumption in diversity outbred mice”. Neuropsychopharmacology12 (2024): 1892-1904.
  20. Miller AP and Gizer IR. “Neurogenetic and multi-omics sources of overlap among sensation seeking, alcohol consumption, and alcohol use disorder”. Addiction Biology 2 (2024): e13365.
  21. Andrade-Brito DE., et al. “Neuronal-specific methylome and hydroxymethylome analysis reveal significant loci associated with alcohol use disorder”. Frontiers in Genetics 15 (2024): 1345410.
  22. Willis C., et al. “Gene expression differences associated with alcohol use disorder in human brain”. Molecular Psychiatry 4 (2024): 1617-1626.
  23. Li CY., et al. “Genes and (common) pathways underlying drug addiction”. PLOS Computational Biology 1 (2008): e2.
  24. Batel P., et al. “A haplotype of the DRD1 gene is associated with alcohol dependence”. Alcohol, Clinical and Experimental Research 4 (2008): 567-572.
  25. Noble EP., et al. “Allelic association of the D2 dopamine receptor gene with receptor-binding characteristics in alcoholism”. Archives of General Psychiatry 7 (1991): 648-654.
  26. Kuo SC., et al. “DRD3 variation is associated with early-onset heroin dependence, but not specific personality traits”. Progress in Neuropsychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry 51 (2014): 1-8.
  27. Van Tol HH. “Structural and functional characteristics of the dopamine D4 receptor”. Advances in Pharmacology 42 (1998): 486-490.
  28. Wang Y., et al. “Analysis of association between the catechol-O-methyltransferase (COMT) gene and negative symptoms in chronic schizophrenia”. Psychiatry Research 2 (2010): 147-150.
  29. Denys D., et al. “Association between the dopamine D2 receptor TaqI A2 allele and low activity COMT allele with obsessive-compulsive disorder in males”. European Neuropsychopharmacology 6 (2006): 446-450.
  30. Ray R., et al. “Human Mu Opioid Receptor (OPRM1 A118G) polymorphism is associated with brain mu-opioid receptor binding potential in smokers”. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 22 (2011): 9268-9273.
  31. Byerley W., et al. “VNTR polymorphism for the human dopamine transporter gene (DAT1)”. Human Molecular Genetics 3 (1993): 335.
  32. Contini V., et al. “MAOA-uVNTR polymorphism in a Brazilian sample: further support for the association with impulsive behaviors and alcohol dependence”. American Journal of Medical Genetics Part B: Neuropsychiatric Genetics 3 (2006): 305-308.
  33. Hiio K., et al. “Effects of serotonin transporter promoter and BDNF Val66Met genotype on personality traits in a population representative sample of adolescents”. Psychiatric Genetics 5 (2011): 261-264.
  34. van der Zwaluw CS., et al. “A serotonin transporter polymorphism (5-HTTLPR) predicts the development of adolescent alcohol use”. Drug and Alcohol Dependence 1-2 (2010): 134-139.
  35. Namkoong K., et al. “Association study of dopamine D2, D4 receptor gene, GABAA receptor beta subunit gene, serotonin transporter gene polymorphism with children of alcoholics in Korea: a preliminary study”. Alcohol 2 (2008): 77-81.
  36. Brainstorm Consortium Anttila V., et al. “Analysis of shared heritability in common disorders of the brain”. Science6395 (2018): eaap8757.
  37. Plomin R., et al. “The genetic basis of complex human behaviors”. Science5166 (1994): 1733-1739.
  38. Lander ES and Schork NJ. “Genetic dissection of complex traits”. Science5181 (1994): 2037-2048.
  39. Blum K., et al. “Allelic association of human dopamine D2 receptor gene in alcoholism”. Journal of the American Medical Association 15 (1990): 2055-2060.
  40. Stice E., et al. “Multilocus genetic composite reflecting dopamine signaling capacity predicts reward circuitry responsivity”. Journal of Neuroscience 29 (2012): 10093-10100.
  41. Tabakoff B., et al. “Genetical genomic determinants of alcohol consumption in rats and humans”. BMC Biology 7 (2009): 70.
  42. Blum K., et al. “Evidence based clinical analytics supporting the genetic addiction risk severity (GARS) assessment to early identify probands in Preaddiction". EC Psychology and Psychiatry 1 (2024): 1-3.
  43. Zeine F., et al. “Solving the global opioid crisis: incorporating genetic addiction risk assessment with personalized dopaminergic homeostatic therapy and awareness integration therapy”. Journal of Addiction Psychiatry 1 (2024): 50-95.
  44. Kótyuk E., et al. “Development and validation of the Reward Deficiency Syndrome Questionnaire (RDSQ-29)”. Journal of Psychopharmacology 3 (2022): 409-422.
  45. Miller DK., et al. “Acute intravenous synaptamine complex variant KB220™ "normalizes" neurological dysregulation in patients during protracted abstinence from alcohol and opiates as observed using quantitative electroencephalographic and genetic analysis for reward polymorphisms: part 1, pilot study with 2 case reports”. Postgraduate Medicine 6 (2010): 188-213.
  46. Blum K., et al. “Synaptamine (SG8839), TM an amino-acid enkephalinase inhibition nutraceutical improves recovery of alcoholics, a subtype of reward deficiency syndrome (RDS)”. Trends in Applied Sciences Research 2 (2007): 132-138.
  47. Miller M., et al. “Early intervention of intravenous KB220IV-neuroadaptagen amino-acid therapy (NAAT) improves behavioral outcomes in a residential addiction treatment program: a pilot study”. Journal of Psychoactive Drugs 5 (2012): 398-409.
  48. Febo M., et al. “Enhanced functional connectivity and volume between cognitive and reward centers of naïve rodent brain produced by pro-dopaminergic agent KB220Z”. PLoS One4 (2017): e0174774.
  49. McLaughlin T., et al. “Pro-dopamine regulator, KB220Z, attenuates hoarding and shopping behavior in a female, diagnosed with SUD and ADHD”. Journal of Behavioral Addictions 1 (2018): 192-203.
  50. Blum K., et al. “Hypothesizing that a pro-dopaminergic regulator (KB220z™ liquid variant) can induce "dopamine homeostasis" and provide adjunctive detoxification benefits in opiate/opioid dependence”. Clinical Medical Reviews and Case Reports 8 (2016): 125.
  51. Solanki N., et al. “Administration of a putative pro-dopamine regulator, a neuronutrient, mitigates alcohol intake in alcohol-preferring rats”. Behavioural Brain Research 385 (2020): 112563.
  52. McLaughlin T., et al. “Improvement of long-term memory access with a pro-dopamine regulator in an elderly male: Are we targeting dopamine tone?” Journal of Systems and Integrative Neuroscience 3 (2017): 10.
  53. McLaughlin T., et al. “Putative dopamine agonist (KB220Z) attenuates lucid nightmares in PTSD patients: role of enhanced brain rewards functional connectivity and homeostasis redeeming joy”. Journal of Behavioral Addictions 2 (2015): 106-115.
  54. Blum K., et al. “rsfMRI effects of KB220Z™ on neural pathways in reward circuitry of abstinent genotyped heroin addicts”. Postgraduate Medicine 2 (2015): 232-241.
  55. Blum K., et al. “Overcoming qEEG abnormalities and reward gene deficits during protracted abstinence in male psychostimulant and polydrug abusers utilizing putative dopamine D₂ agonist therapy: part 2”. Postgraduate Medicine 6 (2010): 214-226.
  56. McLaughlin T., et al. “KB220Z™ a pro-dopamine regulator associated with the protracted, alleviation of terrifying lucid dreams. Can we infer neuroplasticity-induced changes in the reward circuit?”. Journal of Reward Deficiency Syndrome and Addiction Science 1 (2016): 3-13.
  57. Mclaughlin T., et al. “Hypothesizing repetitive paraphilia behavior of a medication refractive Tourette's syndrome patient having rapid clinical attenuation with KB220Z-nutrigenomic amino-acid therapy (NAAT)”. Journal of Behavioral Addictions 2 (2013): 117-124.
  58. Steinberg B., et al. “Low-resolution electromagnetic tomography (LORETA) of changed brain function provoked by pro-dopamine regulator (KB220z) in one adult ADHD case”. Open Journal of Clinical and Medical Case Reports 11 (2016): 1121.
  59. Miller DK., et al. “Acute intravenous synaptamine complex variant KB220™ "normalizes" neurological dysregulation in patients during protracted abstinence from alcohol and opiates as observed using quantitative electroencephalographic and genetic analysis for reward polymorphisms: part 1, pilot study with 2 case reports”. Postgraduate Medicine 6 (2010): 188-213.
  60. Blum K., et al. “Enkephalinase inhibition: regulation of ethanol intake in genetically predisposed mice”. Alcohol 6 (1987): 449-456.
  61. Blum K., et al. “L-dopa: effect on ethanol narcosis and brain biogenic amines in mice”. Nature5397 (1973): 407-409.
  62. Blum K., et al. “Improvement of inpatient treatment of alcoholics as a function of neurotransmitter restoration: a pilot study”. International Journal of the Addictions 9 (1988): 991-998.
  63. Blum K., et al. “Enkephalinase inhibition and precursor amino acid loading improves inpatient treatment of alcohol and polydrug abusers: double-blind placebo-controlled study of the nutritional adjunct SAAVE”. Alcohol 6 (1988): 481-493.
  64. Blum K., et al. “Reduction of both drug hunger and withdrawal against advice rate of cocaine abusers in a 30-day inpatient treatment program by the neuronutrient tropamine”. Current Therapeutic Research6 (1988): 1204-1214.
  65. Brown RJ., et al. “Neurodynamics of relapse prevention: a neuronutrient approach to outpatient DUI offenders”. Journal of Psychoactive Drugs 22 (1990): 173-187.
  66. Blum K., et al. “Neuronutrient effects on weight loss in carbohydrate bingers an open clinical trial”. Current Therapeutic Research2 (1990): 217-233.
  67. DeFrance JF., et al. “Enhancement of attention processing by Kantrol in healthy humans: a pilot study”. "Clinical Electroencephalography 2 (1997): 68-75.
  68. Cold JA. “NeuRecover-SATM in the treatment of cocaine withdrawal and craving: A pilot study”. Clinical Drug Investigation 12 (1996): 1-7.
  69. Ross J. “1st conference on reward deficiency syndrome: Genetic antecedents and clinical pathways San Francisco, California, USA November 12-13, 2000 Abstracts. Amino-acid precursor and enkephalinase inhibition therapy: evidence for effectiveness in treatment of "Reward Deficiency Syndrome (RDS) with particular emphasis on eating disorders”. Molecular Psychiatry 1 (2001): S1-S8.
  70. Chen TJ., et al. “Gene Narcotic Attenuation Program attenuates substance use disorder, a clinical subtype of reward deficiency syndrome”. Advances in Therapy 2 (2007): 402-414.
  71. Chen TJ., et al. “Narcotic antagonists in drug dependence: pilot study showing enhancement of compliance with SYN-10, amino-acid precursors and enkephalinase inhibition therapy”. Medical Hypotheses 3 (2004): 538-548.
  72. Blum K., et al. “Reward deficiency syndrome in obesity: a preliminary cross-sectional trial with a Genotrim variant”. Advances in Therapy 6 (2006): 1040-1051.
  73. Chen TJH., et al. “Chromium picolinate (Crp), a putative anti-obesity nutrient induces changes in body composition as a function of the Taq1 dopamine D2 receptor gene”. Gene Therapy and Molecular Biology2 (2007): 161-170.
  74. Blum K., et al. “LG839: anti-obesity effects and polymorphic gene correlates of reward deficiency syndrome”. Advances in Therapy 9 (2008): 894-913.
  75. Blum K., et al. “A short term pilot open label study to evaluate efficacy and safety of LG839, a customized DNA directed nutraceutical in obesity: Exploring nutrigenomics”. Gene Therapy and Molecular Biology12 (2008): 371-382.
  76. Blum K., et al. “Putative targeting of Dopamine D2 receptor function in Reward Deficiency Syndrome (RDS) by Synaptamine Complex™ Variant (KB220): Clinical trial showing anti-anxiety effects”. Gene Therapy and Molecular Biology13 (2009): 214-230.
  77. Chen D., et al. “Neurotransmitter-precursor-supplement intervention for detoxified heroin addicts”. Journal of Huazhong University of Science and Technology-Medical Sciences 32 (2012): 422-427.
  78. Blum K., et al. “The first pilot epigenetic type improvement of neuropsychiatric symptoms in a polymorphic dopamine D2 (-DRD2/ANKK (Taq1A)), OPRM1 (A/G), DRD3 (C/T), and MAOA (4R) compromised preadolescence male with putative PANDAS/CANS: positive clinical outcome with precision-guided DNA testing and pro-dopamine regulation (KB220) and antibacterial therapies”. Open Journal of Immunology 3 (2024): 60-86.
  79. Kenneth Blum., et al. “Hypothesizing enhanced brain activity as a function of dopamine homeostasis as observed with KB220 in a male with delayed cognitive performance". Acta Scientific Neurology7 (2024): 49-56.
  80. Duquette LL., et al. “Neurobiology of KB220Z-glutaminergic-dopaminergic optimization complex [GDOC] as a liquid nano: clinical activation of brain in a highly functional clinician improving focus, motivation and overall sensory input following chronic intake”. Clinical Medical Reviews and Case Reports 5 (2016): 104.
  81. Blum K., et al. “Summary document research on RDS anti-addiction modeling: annotated bibliography”. Journal of Addiction Psychiatry 1 (2024): 1-33.
  82. Badgaiyan RD. “A novel perspective on dopaminergic processing of human addiction”. Journal of Alcoholism and Drug Dependence 1 (2013): 1000e101.
  83. Connolly CG., et al. “Dissociated grey matter changes with prolonged addiction and extended abstinence in cocaine users”. PLoS One3 (2013): e59645.
  84. Blum K., et al. “Reduction of both drug hunger and withdrawal against advice rate of cocaine abusers in a 30 days inpatient treatment program by the neuronutrient tropamine”. Current Therapeutic Research6 (1988): 1204-1214.
  85. Cole DM., et al. “Dopamine-dependent architecture of cortico-subcortical network connectivity”. Cerebral Cortex (New York, NY: 1991)7 (2013): 1509-1516.
  86. Konova AB., et al. “Effects of methylphenidate on resting-state functional connectivity of the mesocorticolimbic dopamine pathways in cocaine addiction”. JAMA Psychiatry8 (2013): 857-868.

Rajendra D Badgaiyan., et al. “Multi-Locus Pro-Dopaminergic Restoration of Reward Brain Circuitry in Reward Deficiency Rescinds Mono-Pharmaceutical Targeting”. EC Neurology  17.7 (2025): 01-21.