Mini Review Volume 18 Issue 10 - 2026

From Nutrient Sensing to Neurotransmission: An Evolutionary View of Chemical Signaling

Susumu Ito1,2*, Osamu Yokoi2 and Katsuhiko Hata1,2,3

1High-Tech Research Centre, Kokushikan University, Tokyo, Japan
2Research Centre for Mathematical Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
3Department of Sport and Medical Science, Kokushikan University, Tokyo, Japan

*Corresponding Author: Susumu Ito, High-Tech Research Centre, Kokushikan University and Research Centre for Mathematical Medi- cine, Tokyo, Japan.
Received: October 06, 2026; Published: October 22, 2026



Chemical neurotransmission is a highly specialized feature of the nervous system, but many neurotransmitters and receptor architectures are evolutionarily much older than neurons themselves. This Mini Review considers the possibility that neuronal signaling developed largely through the recruitment and reorganization of pre-existing systems for metabolism, nutrient sensing, environmental chemical detection, and intercellular communication. Glutamate, glycine, GABA, and catecholamines illustrate different forms of evolutionary continuity. Importantly, conservation of a signaling molecule does not necessarily imply conservation of its receptor or physiological function. Ancient chemical sensing mechanisms may have been progressively incorporated into increasingly organized forms of cell-to-cell communication and, eventually, synaptic transmission. From this perspective, the nervous system did not create chemical signaling de novo, but transformed ancient molecular components into rapid, directional, and plastic information-processing systems.

Keywords: Evolution of Neurotransmission; Chemical Sensing; Receptor Evolution; Intercellular Signaling; Synaptic Plasticity

  1. Ito S and Hata K. “A brief view of the central nervous system with a focus on synaptic and extrasynaptic transmission”. EC Neurology5 (2020): 54-60.
  2. Moroz LL., et al. “Evolution of glutamatergic signaling and synapses”. Neuropharmacology 199 (2021): 108740.
  3. Lam HM., et al. “Glutamate-receptor genes in plants”. Nature 6707 (1998): 125-126.
  4. Chen GQ., et al. “Functional characterization of a potassium-selective prokaryotic glutamate receptor”. Nature 6763 (1999): 817-821.
  5. Hilf RJC and Dutzler R. “X-ray structure of a prokaryotic pentameric ligand-gated ion channel”. Nature 7185 (2008): 375-379.
  6. Ito S and Cherubini E. “Strychnine-sensitive glycine responses of neonatal rat hippocampal neurones”. The Journal of Physiology 440 (1991): 67-83.
  7. Ito S. “GABA and glycine in the developing brain”. The Journal of Physiological Sciences 5 (2016): 375-379.
  8. Laboute T., et al. “Orphan receptor GPR158 serves as a metabotropic glycine receptor: mGlyR”. Science 6639 (2023): 1352-1358.
  9. Ramesh SA., et al. “Gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) signalling in plants”. Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences9 (2017): 1577-1603.
  10. Clarke MB., et al. “The QseC sensor kinase: a bacterial adrenergic receptor”. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America27 (2006): 10420-10425.
  11. Hata K., et al. “Multicoding in neural information transfer suggested by mathematical analysis of the frequency-dependent synaptic plasticity in vivo”. Scientific Reports1 (2020): 13974.
  12. Takeda Y., et al. “Numerical simulation: Fluctuation in background synaptic activity regulates synaptic plasticity”. Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience 15 (2021): 771661.
  13. Burkhardt P and Jékely G. “Evolution of synapses and neurotransmitter systems: The divide-and-conquer model for early neural cell-type evolution”. Current Opinion in Neurobiology 71 (2021): 127-138.

Susumu Ito. “From Nutrient Sensing to Neurotransmission: An Evolutionary View of Chemical Signaling”. EC Neurology 18.10 (2026): 01-05.