EC Neurology

Review Article Volume 16 Issue 8 - 2024

Closed-Loop Neuronal-Computational Systems: Potentials and Problems

Hannah Kennedy1, Anagha Hamsala1, Gwen Riley1, Katherine Mock1, Sara Fotoohi1, Jotroop Kaur1, Denice Rosario1, Leilani Renteria1, John R Shook2 and James Giordano3*

1Leadership Initiatives-Advanced Medical Neuroscience; Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA 2Philosophy, Politics, and Economics, Bowie State University, Bowie, MD, USA 3Neurology and Biochemistry, and Neuroethics Studies, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington DC, USA

*Corresponding Author: James Giordano, Neurology and Biochemistry, and Neuroethics Studies, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington DC, USA.
Received: July 23; 2024; Published: August 16, 2024



Microelectrode arrays can organize cultivated neurons on various scales for closed feedback loops to measurably enhance their computational capacity. A significant step toward advancing computational interfacing of neural networks employs the use of organoid-computing integration (OCI). The use of OCIs can expand capabilities for bio-electronic assimilation via “encoding” cultured neurons (and neuronal systems of multi-scalar organoids) by developing interconnected computerized signaling on surfaces of multielectrode array contacts. It may be that OCIs could afford a valid simulacrum for the functional computational capabilities of neural networks of a living brain, and in so doing may enable insights to both the “hard question” of neuroscience (viz. how conscious and cognitive processes arise in/from a material (biological) system, and if, how and to what extent OCIs impart sentient characteristics to hybrid and/or synthetic systems (in silico). The potential emergence of high-functioning organic-computational intelligence gives rise to a number of neuroethico-legal and social issues, which require address in ways that are herein proposed.

 Keywords: Neuro-Computational Interface (NCI); Brain Organoids; Organoid-Computing Integration (OCI); Ethical Considerations; Neurorights; Neuroethics

  1. Bisio M., et al. “Closed-loop systems and in vitro neuronal cultures: Overview and applications”. In in vitro neuronal networks: from culturing methods to neuro-technological applications, ed. M. , et al. (Cham: Springer Nature, 2019): 351-387.
  2. Brofiga M., et al. “On the road to the brain-on-a-chip: a review on strategies, methods, and applications”. Journal of Neural Engineering4 (2021): 041005.
  3. Zhu Y., et al. “Engineered human organoids for biomedical applications”. Advanced Functional Materials11 (2024): 2310961.
  4. DeMarse T. “‘Brain’ in a dish acts as autopilot living computer”. Explore Magazine, University of Florida 1 (2005).
  5. Rouleau N. “Embodied 3D neural tissue cultures for cognitive research”. In brain and cognitive intelligence: control in robotics, ed. B. Wei. Boca Raton, Florida: CRC Press (2022): 81-101.
  6. Sharf T., et al. “Functional neuronal circuitry and oscillatory dynamics in human brain organoids”. Nature Communications1 (2022): 4403.
  7. Loveless S., et al. “Do you mind? Toward neurocentric criteria for assessing cognitive function relevant to the moral regard and treatment of non-human organisms”. AJOB Neuroscience2 (2023): 170-173.
  8. Kushner T., et al. “If it only had a brain: What “neuro” means for science and ethics”. Cambridge Quarterly of Health Care Ethics4 (2018): 540-542.
  9. Tran HN., et al. “Micro/nano devices for integration with human brain organoids”. Biosensors and Bioelectronics 218 (2022): 114750.
  10. Wurzman R., et al. “Explanation, explanandum, causality and complexity: A consideration of mind, matter, neuroscience, and physics”. NeuroQuantology3 (2009): 368-381.
  11. Giordano J. “Chem-bio, data and cyberscience and technology in deterrence operations”. Homeland Defense and Security Information Analysis Center (HDIAC) Journal1 (2024): 26-35.
  12. Giordano J., et al. “Addressing the quantitative and qualitative: A view to complementarity - from the synaptic to the social”. Open Journal of Philosophy4 (2013): 1-5.
  13. Smirnova L., et al. “Organoid intelligence (OI): The new frontier in biocomputing and intelligence-in-a-dish”. Frontiers in Science 1 (2023): 1017235.
  14. Bai L., et al. “AI-enabled organoids: Construction, analysis, and application”. Bioactive Materials 31 (2024): 525-548.
  15. Shi H., et al. “Organoid intelligence: Integration of organoid technology and artificial intelligence in the new era of in vitro models”. Medicine in Novel Technology and Devices 21 (2024): 100276.
  16. Tasnim K., et al. “Emerging bioelectronics for brain organoid electrophysiology”. Journal of Molecular Biology3 (2022): 167165.
  17. Shoji J., et al. “Global meta-analysis of organoid and organ-on-chip research”. Advanced Healthcare Materials 21 (2023): e2301067.
  18. Giordano J. “The human prospect(s) of neuroscience and neurotechnology: Domains of influence and the necessity - and questions - of neuroethics”. The Human Prospect1 (2014): 1-18.
  19. Benedikter R., et al. “The future of the self-image of the human being in the age of transhumanism, neurotechnology and global transition”. Futures10 (2010): 1102-1109.
  20. Arendt H. “The Human condition”. Chicago: University of Chicago Press (1958).
  21. Friston K. “The sentient organoid?” Frontiers in Science 1 (2023): 1147911.
  22. Loveless S., et al. “Neuroethics, painience and neurocentric criteria for the moral treatment of animals”. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics2 (2014): 163-172.
  23. Giordano J. “Integrative convergence in neuroscience: trajectories, problems and the need for a progressive neurobioethics.” In Technological innovation in sensing and detecting chemical, biological, radiological, nuclear threats and ecological terrorism, ed. A. Vaseashta., et al. (New York: Springer) (2012): 233-265.
  24. Lavazza A., et al. “Human brain organoids: Why there can be moral concerns if they grow up in the lab and are transplanted or destroyed”. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics4 (2023): 582-596.
  25. Kataoka M., et al. “What implications do a consciousness-independent perspective on moral status entail for future brain organoid research?” AJOB Neuroscience2 (2023): 163-165.
  26. Kagan B., et al. “Neurons embodied in a virtual world: Evidence for organoid ethics?” AJOB Neuroscience2 (2022): 114-117.
  27. Birch J., et al. “Neural organoids and the precautionary principle”. American Journal of Bioethics1 (2021): 56-58.
  28. Fins J., et al. “Minding brain injury, consciousness, and ethics: Discourse and deliberations”. Kennedy Institute Ethics Journal4 (2023): 227-248.
  29. Giordano J., et al. “Neuroethics: What it is, does - and should do”. Health Care Ethics-USA1 (2018): 15-19.
  30. Giordano J. “Neuroethics: Traditions, tasks and values”. The Human Prospect1 (2011): 2-8.
  31. Shook JR., et al. “Designing new neurorights: Tasking and translating them to all humanity”. AJOB Neuroscience4 (2023): 372-374.
  32. Shook JR., et al. “Bioethics and brains: A disciplined and principled neuroethics”. Forthcoming, MIT

James Giordano., et al. “Closed-Loop Neuronal-Computational Systems: Potentials and Problems”. EC Neurology  16.8 (2024): 01-06.