EC Neurology

Havana Syndrome refers to a constellation of neuropsychiatric signs and symptoms that have been classified as anomalous health incidents (AHIs). First reported by personnel working at the US Embassy in Havana, Cuba, in 2016, presentation includes sudden-onset vertigo, feeling of pressure in the head, cognitive dysfunction, tinnitus, autonomic disturbances, and postural instability. It is now widely accepted that directed energy exposure is the most probable cause. The diagnostic process for Havana Syndrome AHIs remains complex and multifactorial, and herein we propose that the use of modular artificial intelligence approaches, particularly those leveraging machine learning and predictive analytics, can integrate multidimensional data from a standardized evaluative protocol employing neuroimaging, cognitive testing, auditory/vestibular assessments, and biomarker analyses to more accurately, effectively and efficiently identify patterns indicative of AHI.

We opine that such use of AI with standardized diagnostic protocols would mitigate variability across cases and institutions, and would ensure ethical integrity in patient care. However, we note that the integration of AI necessitates stringent biocybersecurity measures to protect sensitive patient data from potential breaches, and propose methods toward sustaining safety and integrity when employing these methods.

 Keywords: Havana Syndrome; Anomalous Health Incidents; Neurocognitive Assessment; Artificial Intelligence; Neuroethics

1. Michael Hoffer, personal communication.
2. Giordano J. “Review of factors involved in the occurrence of neurocognitive disruptions in US personnel at the United States Embassy, Havana Cuba”. Consultative Report to the US Department of State (2018).
3. Giordano J. “Probable Cause for the “Havana Syndrome””. Advisory Report to United States Special Operations Command (US SOCOM) (2019).
4. Giordano J. “Directed energy remains key suspect behind Havana syndrome”. National Defense (2024): 5-7.
5. Giordano J and Diane DiEuliis. “Anomalous health incidents of the Havana syndrome; implications and lessons for global biosecurity”. Academia Letters5 (2022).
6. National Academies of Science, Engineering and Medicine. “An assessment of illness in US government employees and their families at overseas embassies”. Washington, DC: National Academies Press (2020).
7. Giordano J. “House report on Havana syndrome must spark action”. National Defense (2024): 9-12.
8. National Institutes of Health. NIH Guidelines (2024).
9. Singh P., et al. “Artificial intelligence based early detection and timely diagnosis of mental illness - A review”. Proceedings of the International Mobile and Embedded Technology Conference (MECON), Noida, India (2022): 282-286.
10. Veneziani I., et al. “Applications of artificial intelligence in the neuropsychological assessment of dementia: a systematic review”. Journal of Personalized Medicine 1 (2024): 113.
11. Wang B., et al. “Machine learning models for the prediction of early-onset bipolar disorder using electronic health records”. MedRxiv2 (2024).
12. Corbin T and Jean-Philippe Deranty. “Artificial intelligence and work: A critical review of recent research from the social sciences”. AI and Society2 (2022): 675-691.
13. Khan F. “How modular AI Enhances LLM”. Medium10 (2023).
14. Sarker IH. “AI-based modeling: Techniques, applications and research issues towards automation, intelligent and smart systems”. SN Computer Science2 (2022): 158.
15. Pearl J. “Probabilistic reasoning in intelligent systems”. Networks of Plausible Inference. Amsterdam: Elsevier (1988).
16. Rowe JP and JC Lester. “Modeling user knowledge with dynamic Bayesian networks in interactive narrative environments”. Proceedings of the Sixth AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Interactive Digital Entertainment (n.d.).
17. Khandelwal P., et al. “Efficient real-time inference in temporal convolution networks” (n.d.).
18. Nielsen M. “Neural networks and deep learning” (2024).
19. Bai S., et al. “An empirical evaluation of generic convolutional and recurrent networks for sequence modeling”. arXiv Computer Science1271 (2018).
20. Collmann J and SA Matei. “Ethical reasoning in big data: An exploratory analysis”. NY: Springer (2016).
21. Kaur R., et al. “Artificial intelligence for cybersecurity: Literature review and future research directions”. Information Fusion 97 (2023): 101804.
22. DiEuliis D., et al. “Biodata risks and synthetic biology: A critical juncture”. Journal of Bioterrorism and Biodefense1 (2018).
23. “What is a Hardware Interrupt and How Do They Work in the S7-400 System?” Siemens Industry Online Support (n.d.).
24. Jada I and Thembekile O Mayayise. “The impact of artificial intelligence on organisational cybersecurity: an outcome of a systematic literature review”. Data and Information Management2 (2024): 100063.
25. DiEuliis D. “Parsing the digital biosecurity landscape”. Georgetown Journal of International Affairs 21 (2020): 166-172.
26. DiEuliis D and James Giordano. “Precision medicine and national security: Implications, issues and imperatives”. Military Medicine1 (2021): 35-39.
27. Chikwetu L., et al. “Does de-identification of data from wearable devices give us a false sense of security? a systematic review”. The Lancet Digital Health4 (2023): e239-e247.
28. DeFranco JP., et al. “Neurodata: Realities and Risks”. DefenceIQ4 (2020).
29. DiEuliis D and James Giordano. ““Designer Biology” and the Need for Biosecurity-by-Design”. NCT Magazine (2021).
30. Incze R. “The cost of machine learning projects”. Medium 9 (2019).
31. DiEuliis D and James Giordano. “Neurotechnological convergence and “big data”: A force-multiplier toward advancing neuroscience”. In: Collmann J, Matei SA (eds.) Ethical Reasoning in Big Data: An Exploratory Analysis. NY: Springer (2016): 71-80.