Research Article Volume 21 Issue 12 - 2025

In Vitro Evaluation of Disinfection Methods for Biofilm Removal on EVA Plates Used in Sports Mouthguards

Mirella Maria Passarinho Camargo1, Bruna N Ceolim2, Arthur Henrique Polli2, Selly S Suzuki1 and Aguinaldo Silva Garcez1,2*

1Faculty of Dentistry, São Leopoldo Mandic, Campinas, SP, Brazil

2Department of Sport Dentistry, Paulista Futebol Clube, Jundiaí, SP, Brazil

*Corresponding Author: Aguinaldo Silva Garcez, Faculty of Dentistry, São Leopoldo Mandic, Campinas, SP, Brazil.
Received: November 03, 2025; Published: November 27, 2025



Sports mouthguards are essential for preventing orofacial injuries but may act as reservoirs for microbial contamination when not properly disinfected. Ethylene-vinyl acetate (EVA), the material commonly used for mouthguards, facilitates bacterial adhesion and biofilm formation. This in vitro study evaluated the effectiveness of different chemical and mechanical disinfection methods for removing Escherichia coli biofilm from EVA surfaces. EVA plates (3 × 3 cm, 3 mm thick; Bio-Art, Brazil) were sterilized with ethylene oxide and immersed in Brain Heart Infusion (BHI) broth containing E. coli (108 CFU/mL) at 37°C for 72h to promote biofilm formation. After incubation, 25 specimens were divided into five groups (n = 5): control (sterile saline), brushing (sterile toothbrush and saline), 0.12% chlorhexidine digluconate, 1% sodium hypochlorite, and effervescent tablet (Corega Tabs®). Disinfection was performed for 5 min, followed by rinsing with sterile saline. Detached biofilms were vortexed, serially diluted, plated on BHI agar, and incubated at 37°C for 24h. Colony-forming units (CFU/mL) were counted and log-transformed. Data were analyzed using ANOVA and Tukey’s test (p < 0.05). All treatments significantly reduced E. coli biofilm compared with the control (p < 0.05). Mean log₁₀ CFU/mL values were: effervescent tablet 1.6 ± 0.4 (4.7-log reduction), chlorhexidine 2.3 ± 0.2 (4.0-log), sodium hypochlorite 2.8 ± 0.3 (3.5-log), brushing 3.5 ± 0.3 (2.8-log), and control 6.3 ± 0.4. Effervescent tablets and chlorhexidine achieved the greatest antimicrobial effect without significant difference (p > 0.05). All evaluated disinfection methods effectively reduced E. coli biofilm on EVA surfaces. Effervescent tablets and 0.12% chlorhexidine provided the best combination of efficacy and material safety, representing practical and reliable options for daily mouthguard hygiene and biofilm control.

 Keywords: EVA; Mouthguard; Biofilm; Disinfection; Escherichia coli

  1. Ilia ES., et al. “Microbial contamination of protective mouthguards in sports”. Microbial Ecology in Health and Disease 25 (2014): 21479.
  2. World Dental Federation - FDI. “Sports mouthguards: policy statement”. International Dental Journal2 (2023): 3-4.
  3. Özkal Eminoğlu S., et al. “Mouthguard use, hygiene, and maintenance practices among combat and team sports athletes: A comparative study”. PLOS ONE1 (2025): e0317952.
  4. Avgerinos V., et al. “Position statement and recommendations for custom-made sport mouthguards”. Dental Traumatology3 (2025): 246-251.
  5. Haddad M and Borro LC. “Enhancing mouthguard longevity: impact of surface treatment against aging”. Dental Traumatology 1 (2024): 55-63.
  6. Wada S., et al. “Antibacterial effect of a disinfectant spray for sports mouthguards on Streptococcus sobrinus”. Dental Research Journal 18 (2021): 59.
  7. Caron GAS., et al. “Photodynamic therapy in the disinfection of complete dentures contaminated with Candida albicans: An in vitro study”. Photodiagnosis and Photodynamic Therapy 31 (2020): 101803.
  8. Hayashi H., et al. “Effects of cleaning sports mouthguards with ethylene-vinyl acetate on oral bacteria”. PeerJ 10 (2022): e14480.
  9. Fernandes FH., et al. “Effects of peracetic acid and sodium hypochlorite on the colour stability and surface roughness of denture base acrylic resins”. Gerodontology 1 (2013): 18-25.
  10. Ribeiro YJS., et al. “Sports mouthguards: contamination, roughness, and chlorhexidine for disinfection-a randomized clinical trial”. Brazilian Dental Journal6 (2021): 66-73.
  11. Glass RT., et al. “Microbiota found in protective athletic mouthguards”. Sports Health3 (2011): 244-248.
  12. Coimbra FCT., et al. “Antimicrobial activity of effervescent denture tablets on multispecies biofilms”. Gerodontology 1 (2021): 87-94.
  13. Tani A., et al. “Sterilization effects of commercial denture cleaners compared with a combination of denture cleaners and ultrasonic cleaning”. Journal of Osaka Dental University2 (2020): 225-238.
  14. Høiby N. “A personal history of research on microbial biofilms and biofilm infections”. Pathogens and Disease3 (2014): 205-211.

Aguinaldo Silva Garcez., et al.In Vitro Evaluation of Disinfection Methods for Biofilm Removal on EVA Plates Used in Sports Mouthguards”. EC Microbiology  21.12 (2025): 01-06.