Research Article Volume 21 Issue 11 - 2025

In Vitro Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing of Azithromycin Against Bacteria Isolated from Patients with Respiratory Tract Infection

Ahmed Khalid A Siddig1, Khalid Saeed Hammad1, Leila Mohamed A Abdelgader1, Ghanem Mohammed Mahjaf1, Tibyan Abd Almajed Altaher2 and Mosab Nouraldein Mohammed Hamad3*

1Department of Medical Microbiology, Faculty of Medical Laboratory Sciences, Shendi University, Shendi, Sudan

2Department of Clinical Chemistry, Faculty of Medical Laboratory Sciences, Shendi University, Shendi, Sudan

3Assistant Professor, Microbiology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Elsheikh Abdallah Elbadri University, Sudan

*Corresponding Author: Mosab Nouraldein Mohammed Hamad, Assistant Professor, Microbiology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Elsheikh Abdallah Elbadri University, Sudan.
Received: June 15, 2025; Published: October 29, 2025



Background: Azithromycin is an amoxicillin antibiotic that has been widely used in the treatment of respiratory tract infections due to its broad-spectrum activity, favorable pharmacokinetics, and immunomodulatory properties.

Objective: To evaluate the in vitro sensitivity of common respiratory tract pathogens to azithromycin.

Methodology: This is a prospective cross-sectional study conducted in Shendi City, Sudan, from January to February 2025, at the Microbiology Laboratory, Faculty of Medical Laboratory Sciences at Shendi University. A total of 30 sputum samples were collected, from which fourteen strains of pathogenic gram-positive bacteria and two strains of pathogenic gram-negative bacteria were isolated and identified using Gram stain and biochemical tests.

Results: Of the 30 clinical specimens, Staphylococcus aureus was confirmed in 6 (60%), Streptococcus pyogenes in 2 (20%), Klebsiella pneumoniae in 1 (10%), and Pseudomonas aeruginosa in 1 (10%). Azithromycin demonstrated remarkable antimicrobial activity against all gram-positive bacteria and one of the gram-negative bacteria (Pseudomonas aeruginosa), which showed intermediate sensitivity.

Conclusion: The findings of this study indicate that Azithromycin can be used as an antibacterial agent against gram-positive bacterial strains.

 Keywords: Antimicrobial; Azithromycin; Gram-Positive Bacteria; Respiratory Tract Infection

  1. Bartlett JG., et al. “Respiratory tract infections: pathogenesis, diagnosis, and management”. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 3 (2018): e01233-17.
  2. Dudley MN., et al. “Pharmacokinetics and clinical utility of Azithromycin in respiratory tract infections”. Clinical Infectious Diseases 5 (2021): 815-824.
  3. Gao Y., et al. “Antimicrobial resistance trends in respiratory tract pathogens: a global perspective”. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy 1 (2022): e01521-21.
  4. Ventola CL. “The antibiotic resistance crisis: part 1: causes and threats”. P & T4 (2015): 277-283.
  5. World Health Organization. “Global action plan on antimicrobial resistance”. Geneva: WHO (2020).
  6. Seppala H., et al. “The effect of changes in the consumption of macrolide antibiotics on erythromycin resistance in group A streptococci in Finland”. New England Journal of Medicine 7 (1997): 441-446.
  7. Hopkins S. “Clinical toleration and safety of azithromycin”. American Journal of Medicine3A (1991): 40S-45S.
  8. Seppala H., et al. “Resistance to erythromycin in group A streptococci”. New England Journal of Medicine 5 (1992): 292-297.
  9. Betriu C., et al. “Comparative in vitro activities of linezolid, quinupristin dalfopristin, moxifloxacin, and trovafloxacin against erythromycin susceptible and resistant streptococci”. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy 7 (2000): 1838-1841.
  10. Jacobs MR., et al. “Susceptibility of 1100 Streptococcus pneumoniae strains isolated in 1997 from seven Latin American and Caribbean countries”. International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents 1 (2000): 1724.
  11. Koneman EW., et al. “Color atlas and textbook of diagnostic microbiology”. 6th Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins (2006).
  12. MacFaddin JF. “Biochemical tests for identification of medical bacteria”. 3rd Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins (2000).
  13. Koneman EW., et al. “Color atlas and textbook of diagnostic microbiology”. 6th Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins (2006).
  14. Murray PR and Zeitinger JR. “Evaluation of Mueller-Hinton agar for disk diffusion susceptibility tests”. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 5 (1983): 1269-1271.
  15. Cheesbrough M. “District laboratory practice in tropical countries”. Second edition. Part 2 (2006).
  16. Mahboob N., et al. “Disk diffusion method in enriched Mueller Hinton agar for determining susceptibility of Candida isolates”. Journal of Dhaka Medical College 1 (2020): 28-33.
  17. Ibrahim TA., et al. “Antibacterial activity of herbal extracts against multidrug resistant of bacteria from clinical origin”. Life Sciences Leaflets 15 (2011): 490-498.
  18. Javed H., et al. “Antibiotic susceptibility patterns of respiratory pathogens”. Journal of Infection in Developing Countries 5 (2018): 345-350.
  19. Abdelgader LM., et al. “Antimicrobial activity of azithromycin and erythromycin against Streptococcus pyogenes isolated from sore throat patients in Shendi, Sudan”. SAR Journal of Pathology and Microbiology 1 (2024): 1-7.

Mosab Nouraldein Mohammed Hamad., et al.In Vitro Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing of Azithromycin Against Bacteria Isolated from Patients with Respiratory Tract Infection”. EC Microbiology  21.11 (2025): 01-06.