EC Microbiology

Research Article Volume 8 Issue 2 - 2017

Catheter-Associated Urinary Tract Infections at Intensive Care Unit in Bahrain

Sanaa AlKhawaja1 *, Safaa AlKhawaja2, Nermin K Saeed3, Nashwa Fawzy Abd El Moez Azam4 and Sara Mansoor Hussain5

1Senior Critical Care Consultant, Intensive Care and Anesthesia Department, Salmaniya Medical Center, Bahrain

2Consultant, Infectious Diseases, Head of Infection Control Department, Salmaniya Medical Center, Ministry of Health, Bahrain

3Consultant Microbiologist, Head of Microbiology Department, Salmaniya Medical Center, Ministry of Health, Bahrain

4Lecturer of Microbiology, High Institute of Public Health, Alexandria University, Egypt

5Medical resident, Department of Accident and Emergency, Salmaniya Medical Center, Ministry of Health, Bahrain

*Corresponding Author: Sanaa AlKhawaja, Senior Critical Care Consultant, Intensive Care and Anesthesia Department, Salmaniya Medical Center, Bahrain. E-mail: drsanaicu@gmail.com
Received: May 02, 2017; Published: May 23, 2017



Background: The incidence of catheter-associated urinary tract infections (CAUTIs), and etiologic agents and antibiotic resistant patterns associated with CAUTIs in the intensive care unit at Salmaniya medical complex were recorded to identify risk factors as- sociated with acquiring these infections and recommended treatment.

Methods: Prospective surveillance of CAUTIs was conducted from January 1, 2014 till December 31, 2015 using the standard Centers for Disease Control National Nosocomial Infection Surveillance (NNIS) case definitions. Rates were expressed as the number of infec- tions per 1000 catheter days.

Results: During the study period, 1490 patients were monitored for a total of 11,602 patient days and 9,630 patient urinary catheter days. Fifty-one episodes of CAUTI were diagnosed, for an overall rate of 5.3/1000 catheter days. Compliance to the UTI prevention bundle was more than 90%. Male gender, older age, prolonged ICU stay, and medical rather than surgical admission were important risk factors associated with acquiring CAUTI. The most frequently isolated organisms were E. coli (28.8%), Klebsiella spp. (26.9%), and Candida (25%,), followed by Pseudomonas spp. (11.6%) and Proteus mirabilis (ESBL) spp. (7.7%).

Conclusion: Our incidence of ICU acquired CAUTIs was lower than previously reported in our center, which could be attributed to a significant increase in adherence to infection control policies and procedures. Significant risk factors for developing an ICU-acquired UTI were male gender, old age, prolonged ICU stay, and medical admission. Meropenem as monotherapy or in combination with aminoglycoside seems to be the most appropriate empiric choice for the treatment of CAUTI among critically ill ICU patients; subsequent de-escalation after sensitivity testing of the causative organism is essential.

keywords: Catheter-Associated Urinary Tract Infection; Critical Care Unit; Urinary Tract Infection; Bahrain; Surveillance; Infection Control

  1. Health care Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee (HICPAC). “Guideline for prevention of catheter-associated urinary tract infections 2009”.
  2. Clec’h C., et al. “Does catheter-associated urinary tract infection increase mortality in critically ill patients?” Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology12 (2007): 1367-1373.
  3. Laupland KB., et al. “Intensive care unit-acquired urinary tract infections in a regional critical care system”. Critical Care2 (2005): R60-R65.
  4. Horan TC., et al. “CDC/NHSN surveillance definition of health care-associated infection and criteria for specific types of infections in the acute care setting”. American Journal of Infection Control5 (2008): 309-332.
  5. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. “Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing Twenty-second informational supplement M100-S22”. Wayne, PA: Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (2012).
  6. European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST). Breakpoint tables for interpretation of MICs and zone diameters. Version 5.0 (2015).
  7. Rutkowska K., et al. “Healthcare associated infection in the newly-opened intensive care unit”. Anaesthesiology Intensive Therapy2 (2013): 62-66.
  8. Walaszek M, et al. “Zakażenia szpitalne u chorych hospitalizowanych w latach 2005-2011. Szpital wojewódzki im. Św. Łukasza w Tarnowie”. Przeglad Epidemiologiczny 66 (2012): 617-621.
  9. Agodi A and Barchitta M. “Epidemiology and control of urinary tract infections in intensive care patients”. In: Nikibakhsh A (ed): Clinical Management of complicated urinary tract infection. In Tech (2011): 4-18.
  10. Surveillance Data of Bahrain, MoH, Infection Control Department.
  11. Duszyńska., et al. “Urinary tract infections in intensive care unit patients - a single-centre, 3-year observational study according to the INICC project”. Anaesthesiology Intensive Therapy 48.1 (2016): 1-6.
  12. Rosenthal VD., et al. “International Nosocomial Infection Control Consortium report, data summary of 43 countries for 2007-2012. Device-associated module”. American Journal of Infection Control9 (2014): 942-956.
  13. Hu B., et al. “Device-associated infection rates, device use, length of stay, and mortality in intensive care units of 4 Chinese hospitals: International Nosocomial Control Consortium findings”. American Journal of Infection Control4 (2013): 301-306.
  14. Apostolopoulou E., et al. “Surveillance of device associated infection rates and mortality in 3 Greek intensive care units”. American Journal of Critical Care3 (2013): e12-e20.
  15. Datta P., et al. “Health-care-associated infections: Risk factors and epidemiology from an intensive care unit in Northern India”. Indian Journal of Anaesthesia1 (2014): 30-35.
  16. Talaat M., et al. “Surveillance of catheter-associated urinary tract infection in 4 intensive care units at Alexandria university hospitals in Egypt”. American Journal of Infection Control3 (2010): 222-228.
  17. Gikas A., et al. “Device-associated infections in the intensive care units of Cyprus: Results of the first national incidence study”. Infection3 (2010): 165-171.
  18. Mehta A., et al. “Device-associated nosocomial infection rates in intensive care units of seven Indian cities. Findings of the International Nosocomial Infection Control Consortium (INICC)”. Journal of Hospital Infection2 (2007): 168-174.
  19. Tao L., et al. “Device-associated infection rates in 398 intensive care units in Shanghai, China: International Nosocomial Infection Control Consortium (INICC) findings”. International Journal of Infectious Diseases11 (2011): e774-e780.
  20. Dudeck MA., et al. “National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN) report, data summary for 2012, Device-associated module”. American Journal of Infection Control12 (2013): 1148-1166.
  21. Habibi S., et al. “Epidemiology of nosocomial infections in medicine intensive care unit at a tertiary care hospital in northern India”. Tropical Doctor4 (2008): 233-235.
  22. Agarwal R., et al. “Epidemiology, risk factors and outcome of nosocomial infections in a respiratory intensive care unit in north India”. Journal of Infection2 (2006): 98-105.
  23. Meric M., et al. “Intensive care unit-acquired infections: Incidence, risk factors and associated mortality in a Turkish University Hospital”. Japanese Journal of Infectious Diseases5 (2005): 297-302.
  24. Pellizzer G., et al. “Prevalence and risk factors for nosocomial infections in hospitals of the Veneto Region, North- Eastern Italy”. Infection2 (2008): 112-119.
  25. Foxman B. “Epidemiology of urinary tract infections: Incidence, morbidity, and economic costs”. American Journal of Medicine1A (2002): 5S-13S.
  26. , et al. “Relationship of catheter-associated urinary tract infection to mortality and length of stay in critically ill patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies”. Critical Care Medicine 39.5 (2011): 1167-1173.
  27. Scott RD. “The direct medical costs of healthcare-associated infections in U.S. hospitals and the benefits of prevention, 2009”. Division of Healthcare Quality Promotion, National Center for Preparedness, Detection, and Control of Infectious Diseases, Coordinating Center for Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, February 2009.
  28. Ko MC., et al. “Species and antimicrobial resistance of uropathogens isolated from patients with urinary catheter”. Tohoku Journal of Experimental Medicine4 (2008): 311-319.
  29. Wazait HD., et al. “Catheter-associated urinary tract infections: Prevalence of uropathogens and pattern of antimicrobial resistance in a UK hospital (1996-2001)”. BJU International9 (2003): 806-809.
  30. Bonadio M., et al. “Current microbiological and clinical aspects of urinary tract infections”. European Urology4 (2001): 439- 445.
  31. Lee JH., et al. “Factors that affect nosocomial catheter-associated urinary tract infection in intensive care units: 2-year experience at a single center”. Korean Journal of Urology1 (2013): 59-65.
  32. Al-Hazmi H. “Role of duration of catheterization and length of hospital stay on the rate of catheter-related hospital-acquired urinary tract infections”. Research and Reports in Urology 7 (2015): 41-47.
  33. Keten D., et al. “Catheter-associated urinary tract infections in intensive care units at a university hospital in Turkey”. Bosnian Journal of Basic Medical Sciences4 (2014): 227-233.
  34. Hidron AI., et al. “National Healthcare Safety Network Team Participating National Healthcare Safety Network Facilities. NHSN annual update: Antimicrobial-resistant pathogens associated with healthcare-associated infections: Annual summary of data reported to the National Healthcare Safety Network at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2006-2007”. Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology 29.11 (2008): 996-1011.

Sanaa AlKhawaja, et al. “Catheter-Associated Urinary Tract Infections at Intensive Care Unit in Bahrain”. EC Microbiology  8.2 (2017): 71-79.