Review Article Volume 13 Issue 11 - 2025

Drug Safety Ten Years After Implementation of the Pregnancy and Lactation Labeling Rule and Abolition of Letter-Based Pregnancy Risk Categories

Payton Murphy1* and FA Fitzpatrick2

1OMS4, Kansas College of Osteopathic Medicine, Kansas, USA

2Department of Biomedical Science, Kansas College of Osteopathic Medicine, USA

*Corresponding Author: Payton Murphy, OMS4, Kansas College of Osteopathic Medicine, Kansas, USA.
Received: October 03, 2025; Published: October 31, 2025



Most pregnant patients use prescription or over-the-counter medicines, yet high-quality human safety data remain limited and often inconsistently communicated. This narrative review synthesizes contemporary evidence on medication use in pregnancy and appraises the impact, implementation, and gaps of U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) labeling reforms-especially the 2015 Pregnancy and Lactation Labeling Rule (PLLR). Epidemiologic studies show medication exposure is common and increasing, while robust human data lag; uncertainty, cultural factors, and clinician communication styles amplify perceived teratogenic risk and can undermine adherence. The PLLR replaced letter categories (A, B, C, D, X) with structured narrative sections (Pregnancy, Lactation, and Females/Males of Reproductive Potential) intended to reduce oversimplification and improve risk-benefit decisions. However, clinician awareness and use of PLLR content remain inconsistent, with persistent reliance on legacy categories and secondary databases. Post-approval evidence streams-pregnancy exposure registries and health-care utilization databases-now supply most human data, yet studies are frequently delayed, underpowered, or methodologically constrained, and labeling changes may take years. Internationally, FDA and European Medicines Agency labeling often diverge in language and directionality despite drawing on similar sources, further complicating counseling. Label modernization is necessary but insufficient. Priority actions include ethically including pregnant and lactating persons in clinical trials, accelerating harmonized post-approval evidence generation, standardizing clear communication that quantifies background versus drug-attributable risks, and educating clinicians to navigate PLLR narratives. Aligning evidence generation with effective risk communication is essential to support evidence-based prescribing and improve maternal-fetal safety.

 Keywords: Pregnancy and Lactation Labeling Rule; Letter Categories

  1. Rossen L., et al. “Updated methodology to estimate overall and unintended pregnancy rates in the United States”. Vital Health Statistics 2 (2023): 1-15.
  2. Mazer-Amirshahi M., et al. “Trends in pregnancy labeling and data quality for US-approved pharmaceuticals”. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology6 (2014): 690.e1-e11.
  3. Eke A., et al. “Pharmacologic research in pregnant women-time to get it right”. New England Journal of Medicine 14 (2019): 1293-1295.
  4. Caritis S and Venkataramanan R. “Obstetrical, fetal, and lactation pharmacology-a crisis that can no longer be ignored”. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology1 (2021): 10-20.
  5. Patel A., et al. “Availability of safe and effective therapeutic options to pregnant and lactating individuals following the United States Food and Drug Administration Pregnancy and Lactation Labeling Rule”. Journal of Pediatrics 259 (2023): 113342.
  6. Widnes SF and Schjøtt J. “Risk perception regarding drug use in pregnancy”. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology4 (2017): 375-378.
  7. Jasper J., et al. “Effects of framing on teratogenic risk perception in pregnant women”. Lancet 9289 (2001): 1237-1238.
  8. Koren G., et al. “Women's perception of teratogenic risk”. Canadian Journal of Public Health 3 (1991): S11-14, S33-37.
  9. Mitchell A., et al. “Medication use during pregnancy, with particular focus on prescription drugs: 1976-2008”. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology1 (2011): 51.e1-e8.
  10. Shroukh W., et al. “Risk management of teratogenic medicines: a systematic review”. Birth Defects Research 20 (2020): 1755-1766.
  11. Ayad M and Costantine M. “Epidemiology of medication use in pregnancy”. Seminars in Perinatology 7 (2015): 508-511.
  12. van den Bosch A., et al. “Use and impact of cardiac medication during pregnancy”. Future Cardiology 1 (2015): 89-100.
  13. Howley M., et al. “Asthma medication use and risk of birth defects: National Birth Defects Prevention Study, 1997-2011”. Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology: In Practice 10 (2020): 3490-3499.e9.
  14. Dulay A. “Risk factors for pregnancy complications”. Merck Manual Professional Edition: Gynecology & Obstetrics (2024).
  15. Pasternak B and Hviid A. “Use of proton-pump inhibitors in early pregnancy and the risk of birth defects”. New England Journal of Medicine 22 (2010): 2114-2123.
  16. Gregory D., et al. “The pregnant patient: managing common acute medical problems”. American Family Physician 9 (2018): 595-602.
  17. Haas D., et al. “Prescription and other medication use in pregnancy”. Obstetrics and Gynecology5 (2018): 789-798.
  18. Mansour O., et al. “Prescription medication use during pregnancy in the United States from 2011 to 2020: trends and safety evidence”. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology2 (2024): 250.e1-250.e16.
  19. Werler M., et al. “Patterns of prescription medication use during the first trimester of pregnancy in the United States, 1997-2018”. Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics 4 (2023): 836-844.
  20. Andrade S., et al. “Prescription drug use in pregnancy”. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 2 (2004): 398-407.
  21. Subramanian A., et al. “Polypharmacy during pregnancy and associated risk factors: a retrospective analysis of 577 medication exposures among 1.5 million pregnancies in the UK, 2000-2019”. BMC Medicine 1 (2023): 21.
  22. Anand A., et al. “Prevalence of polypharmacy in pregnancy: a systematic review”. BMJ Open3 (2023): e067585.
  23. Scaffidi J., et al. “The pregnant woman as a drug orphan: a global survey of registered clinical trials of pharmacological interventions in pregnancy”. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 1 (2017): 132-140.
  24. Quinney S and Bonate P. “A pharmacometrician’s role in enhancing medication use in pregnancy and lactation”. Journal of Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics 4 (2020): 267-269.
  25. Pinheiro E and Stika C. “Drugs in pregnancy: pharmacologic and physiologic changes that affect clinical care”. Seminars in Perinatology 3 (2020): 151221.
  26. Byrne J., et al. “Evaluation of drug labels following the 2015 Pregnancy and Lactation Labeling Rule”. JAMA Network Open 8 (2020): e2015094.
  27. Temming L. et al. “Clinical management of medications in pregnancy and lactation”. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology6 (2016): 698-702.
  28. Wesley B., et al. “Prescription medications for use in pregnancy: perspective from the US Food and Drug Administration”. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology1 (2021): 21-32.
  29. Wood M., et al. “Safe expectations: current state and future directions for medication safety in pregnancy research”. Clinical Therapeutics 12 (2019): 2467-2476.
  30. DiNatale M., et al. “The importance of clinical research in pregnant women to inform prescription drug labeling”. Journal of Clinical Pharmacology 2 (2020): S18-S25.
  31. S. Food and Drug Administration. “Content and Format of Labeling for Human Prescription Drug and Biological Products; Requirements for Pregnancy and Lactation Labeling (Pregnancy and Lactation Labeling Final Rule)”. Federal Register 79.233 (2014): 72064-72103.
  32. Kappel D., et al. “A comparison of FDA and EMA pregnancy and lactation labeling”. Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics 6 (2023): 1251-1257.
  33. Leek J and Arif H. “Pregnancy medications”. StatPearls (2025).
  34. Adam M., et al. “Evolving knowledge of the teratogenicity of medications in human pregnancy”. American Journal of Medical Genetics Part C: Seminars in Medical Genetics 3 (2011): 175-182.
  35. Andrade S., et al. “Use of prescription medications with a potential for fetal harm among pregnant women”. Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety 8 (2006): 546-554.
  36. Vignato J., et al. “Over-the-counter pain medication use during pregnancy”. MCN: The American Journal of Maternal/Child Nursing 4 (2023): 209-214.
  37. Zafeiri A., et al. “Over-the-counter analgesics during pregnancy: a comprehensive review of global prevalence and offspring safety”. Human Reproduction Update 1 (2021): 67-95.
  38. Ramoz L and Patel-Shori N. “Recent changes in pregnancy and lactation labeling: retirement of risk categories”. Pharmacotherapy4 (2014): 389-395.
  39. Greene M. “FDA drug labeling for pregnancy and lactation drug safety monitoring systems”. Seminars in Perinatology 7 (2015): 520-523.
  40. Fantasia H and Harris A. “Changes to pregnancy and lactation risk labeling for prescription drugs”. Nursing for Women's Health 3 (2015): 266-270.
  41. Mosley J., et al. “An overview of upcoming changes in pregnancy and lactation labeling information”. Pharmacy Practice (Granada) 2 (2015): 605.
  42. Pernia S and DeMaagd G. “The new pregnancy and lactation labeling rule”. Pharmacy (P&T)11 (2016): 713-715.
  43. Sahin L., et al. “Medication use in pregnancy and the pregnancy and lactation labeling rule”. Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics 1 (2016): 23-25.
  44. Wilmer E., et al. “Drug safety: pregnancy rating classifications and controversies”. Clinics in Dermatology 3 (2016): 401-409.
  45. Blattner C., et al. “Understanding the new FDA pregnancy and lactation labeling rules”. International Journal of Women's Dermatology 1 (2016): 5-7.
  46. Brucker M and King T. “The 2015 US Food and Drug Administration Pregnancy and Lactation Labeling Rule”. Journal of Midwifery and Women's Health 3 (2017): 308-316.
  47. Broussard C., et al. “Developing a systematic approach to safer medication use during pregnancy: summary of a CDC-convened meeting”. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology3 (2014): 208-214.e1.
  48. Namazy J., et al. “Clinicians' perspective of the new Pregnancy and Lactation Labeling Rule: results from an AAAAI/FDA survey”. Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology: In Practice 6 (2020): 1947-1952.
  49. Alem G., et al. “Evaluation of knowledge of the new Pregnancy and Lactation Labeling Rule among pharmacists and physicians”. Journal of the American Pharmacists Association 2 (2022): 427-431.
  50. Alem G., et al. “Assessment of knowledge of the new pregnancy and lactation labeling rule among pharmacists and physicians in Saudi Arabia”. Medicine (Baltimore)32 (2024): e38995.
  51. Robinson A., et al. “Removal of pregnancy categories and likelihood of prescribing: a randomized trial”. Journal of Perinatal Medicine 4 (2023): 546-549.
  52. Koenig T., et al. “Healthcare providers' use of a concise summary to prescribe for lactating patients”. Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy 5 (2024): 531-538.
  53. Shore C., et al. “Inclusion of pregnant and lactating persons in clinical trials: proceedings of a workshop”. Washington (DC): National Academies Press (2022).
  54. Thiele L., et al. “Gaps in evidence-based medicine: underrepresented populations still excluded from trials following 2018 HHS Task Force recommendations”. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 6 (2022): 908-909.
  55. Alwan S and Grant K. “Maternal medication use in pregnancy: assessing and communicating the ‘risk’ of birth defects to patients”. Pharmacoepidemiology4 (2024): 336-349.
  56. Gelperin K., et al. “A systematic review of pregnancy exposure registries: examination of protocol-specified pregnancy outcomes, target sample size, and comparator selection”. Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety 2 (2017): 208-214.
  57. Bird S., et al. “Enrollment and retention in 34 United States pregnancy registries contrasted with spontaneous reports”. Drug Safety 1 (2018): 87-94.
  58. S. Food and Drug Administration. “Postapproval pregnancy safety studies guidance for industry”.
  59. Holmes L., et al. “Ascertainment of malformations in pregnancy registries: lessons from the North American AED Pregnancy Registry”. Birth Defects Research 14 (2023): 1274-1283.
  60. Matsui D. “Adherence with drug therapy in pregnancy”. Obstetrics and Gynecology International (2012): 796590.
  61. de Korte B., et al. “Adherence to prescription medication during pregnancy: do pregnant women use pharmacological treatment as prescribed?” British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology 5 (2023): 1521-1531.
  62. Avachat C., et al. “Characterization of FDA post-marketing commitments and requirements for pregnancy and lactation”. Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics 6 (2023): 1238-1242.
  63. Krastein J., et al. “A review of pregnancy and lactation postmarketing studies required by the FDA”. Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety 3 (2023): 287-297.
  64. Moneer O., et al. “New drug postmarketing requirements and commitments in the US: a systematic review of the evidence”. Drug Safety 4 (2022): 305-318.
  65. Fernandes M., et al. “Post-approval activities providing data on the safety of medication use during pregnancy and lactation: a TransCelerate perspective”. Therapeutic Innovation and Regulatory Science 3 (2025): 527-541.
  66. Andrade S., et al. “Administrative claims data versus augmented pregnancy data for study of pharmaceutical treatments in pregnancy”. Current Epidemiology Reports 2 (2017): 106-116.
  67. S. Food and Drug Administration. FDA public meeting: study approaches methods to evaluate safety of drugs and biological products in pregnancy in the post-approval setting.
  68. Huybrechts KF., et al. “Use of real-world evidence from healthcare utilization data to evaluate drug safety during pregnancy”. Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety 7 (2019): 906-922.
  69. Cohen-Sedgh R., et al. “Neoplasm reports in FDA Adverse Event Reporting System following angiotensin receptor blocker recalls”. Circulation: Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes 8 (2021): e007476.
  70. Al-Zidan R. “Drugs in pregnancy: a handbook for pharmacists and physicians”. 1st New York: Apple Academic Press (2020).
  71. Rosenberg M., et al. “FDA postmarketing safety labeling changes: impacts on prescribing rates, utilization, and outcomes”. Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety 9 (2020): 1022-1029.
  72. Briesacher B., et al. “A critical review of methods to evaluate the impact of FDA regulatory actions”. Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety 9 (2013): 986-994.
  73. Barnes K., et al. “Can positive framing reduce nocebo side effects? Current evidence and recommendations”. Frontiers in Pharmacology 10 (2019): 167.
  74. Jasper J., et al. “Effects of framing on teratogenic risk perception in pregnant women”. Lancet9289 (2001): 1237-1238.

Payton Murphy and FA Fitzpatrick. “Drug Safety Ten Years After Implementation of the Pregnancy and Lactation Labeling Rule and Abolition of Letter-Based Pregnancy Risk Categories”. EC Pharmacology and Toxicology  13.11 (2025): 01-14.