EC Ophthalmology

Case Report Volume 14 Issue 2 - 2023

Proptosis Secondary to Meningioma of the Sphenoid Wing

Gómez María Alejandra* and Paiz Martin Alexander

Ophthalmologist, Hospital Ángel C. Padilla, Argentina

*Corresponding Author: Gómez María Alejandra, Ophthalmologist, Hospital Ángel C. Padilla, Argentina.
Received: September 26, 2022; Published: January 31, 2023



Objective: Presentation of a clinical case of a female patient with meningioma in the sphenoid wing with ophthalmological manifestations. Spheno-orbital meningiomas are rare intracranial tumors that arise in the sphenoid wing. These tumors can invade important neurovascular structures making radical resection difficult, and residual tumors often lead to recurrence.

Summary: 44-year-old female patient referred by a clinician for proptosis of 6 months of evolution. The ophthalmological examination presented proptosis in the right eye, with inferior projection, preserved ocular motility in 9 quadrants, with diplopia in extreme superior and extreme lateral gaze. Visual acuity 10/10 both eyes. Computerized visual field od altered oi normal. Normal eye fundus at the time of examination. Brain MRI is requested where a marked thickening and heterogeneous signal, predominantly hypotensive in T2, are reported. This alteration conditioned compression and displacement of the external rectum. Interconsultation with neurosurgery is performed and diagnostic and therapeutic resection is planned.

Pathology reports meningioma meningotheliomatous intraosseous grade 1 of the sphenoid wing.

On postoperative ophthalmological examination, the patient presented no proptosis, preserved motility in 9 quadrants without diplopia, VA 10/10, normal computerized visual field in both eyes.

At six months post-surgery, there are no imaging or clinical signs of recurrence.

Conclusion: The maximum safe resection with preservation of function continues to be the most important prognostic factor associated with lower recurrence rates and the performance at the right time of surgery reduces permanent ophthalmological alterations.

Keywords: Sphenoid Meningioma; Proptosis; Visual Disability

  1. RA Horbinski ., et al. “An overview of meningiomas”. Frontiers in Oncology 14 (2018): 2161-2177.
  2. K Huntoon., et al. “Meningioma: a review of clinicopathological and molecular aspects”. Frontiers in Oncology 10 (2020):1-14.
  3. O Qt., et al. “CBTRUS statistical report: primary brain and other central nervous system tumors diagnosed in the United States in 2012- 2016”. Neuro-Oncology 21 (2020): V1-V100.
  4. Baha'eddin A Muhsen., et al. “In- sphenoid plate wing grade II meningioma: Case report and review of literature”. Annals of Medicine and Surgery (2022): 103322.
  5. TA Elder., et al. “En plaque meningiomas: a narrative review”. Journal of Neurological Surgery Part B: Skull Base 82 (2021): E33-E44.
  6. Mohammad Samadian. “Surgical Outcomes of Sphenoorbital En Plaque Meningioma: A 10-Year Experience in 57 Consecutive Cases (2020).
  7. Honeybul S., et al. “Sphenoid wing meningioma en plaque: a clinical review”. Acta Neurochirurgica 143 (2001): 749-758.
  8. Cushing H and Eisenhardt L. “Meningiomas. Their classification, regional behavior, life history, and surgical end results. Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas (1938).
  9. Honig S., et al. “Meningiomas involving the sphenoid wing outcome after microsurgical treatment a clinical review of 73 cases”. Central European Neurosurgery Journal 71 (2010): 189-198.
  10. Sandalcioglu IE., et al. “Interdisciplinary surgical approach, resectability and long-term results”. Journal of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery 33 (2005): 260-266.
  11. Stephen T. “MAGILL1 y col, Sphenoid wing meningiomas Handbook of Clinical Neurology, (3rd series): Meningiomas, Part II ,M.W”. McDermott, Editor (2021): 170.
  12. Mohammad Samadian. “Surgical Outcomes of Sphenoorbital En Plaque Meningioma: A 10-Year Experience in 57 Consecutive Cases (2020).
  13. Oya S., et al. “Sphenoorbital meningioma: surgical technique and outcome”. Journal of Neurosurgery 114 (2011): 1241-1249.
  14. Ga-On Park and Hyun Ho Park y col. “Surgical Outcomes of Sphenoid Wing Meningioma with Periorbital Invasion”. Journal of Korean Neurosurgical Society3 (2022): 449-456.
  15. Cannon PS., et al. “The surgical management and outcomes for spheno-orbital meningiomas: a 7-year review of multi-disciplinary practice”. Orbit Amsterdam, Netherlands 28 (2009): 371-337.
  16. Baha'eddin A Muhsen., et al. “En-plaque sphenoid wing grade II meningioma: Case report and review of literature”. Annals of Medicine and Surgery 74 (2022): 103322.
  17. G Mirone., et al. “En plaque sphenoid wing meningiomas: recurrence factors and surgical strategy in a series of 71 patients”. Neurosurgery 65 (2009):100-109.
  18. Saeed P., et al. “Natural history of spheno-orbital meningiomas”. Acta Neurochirurgica 153 (2011): 395-402.
  19. Yao CA Sarkiss., et al. “Shrivastava, Surgical limitations in convexity meningiomas en-plaque: is radical resection necessary?” Journal of Clinical Neuroscience 27 (2016): 28-33.
  20. ODe Jesús and MM Toledo. “Surgical management of meningioma en plaque of the sphenoid ridge”. Surgical Neurology International 55 (2001): 265-269.
  21. Xu G., et al. “Analysis of the causes of surgical complications of medial sphenoidal ridge meningioma”. Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi 86 (2006): 632-635.
  22. TA Elder., et al. “En plaque meningiomas: a narrative review”. Journal of Neurological Surgery Part B: Skull Base 82 (2021).

Gómez María Alejandra and Paiz Martin Alexander. Proptosis Secondary to Meningioma of the Sphenoid Wing . EC Ophthalmology 14.2 (2023): 37-41.