EC Ophthalmology

Research Article Volume 15 Issue 11 - 2024

Modern Methods of Aphakia Correction with Domestically Produced Intraocular Lens

Kislitsyna NM1*, Sultanova DM1 and Novikov SV2

1The S. Fyodorov Eye Microsurgery Federal State Institution, Moscow, Russia
2LLC “NEP MG”, Moscow, Russia

*Corresponding Author: Kislitsyna NM, The S. Fyodorov Eye Microsurgery Federal State Institution, Moscow, Russia.
Received: August 09, 2024; Published: October 28, 2024



Rationale: Currently, the primary emphasis in the development of ophthalmic surgery is centred towards the development of high-quality domestic intraocular lens (IOL) models. These models are designed for implantation through a small incision, ensuring precise positioning during suture fixation in the ciliary sulcus. They are characterised by specifically designed shapes and strategically positioned holes in the haptic elements, enabling visual-guided needle manipulation even in instances of miosis or pupil deformation.

Objective: To modernise the design of the domestic model of IOL RSP -1 within the current technical specifications.

Materials and Methods: In collaboration with OOO NEP Eye Microsurgery, we have undertaken a modernisation venture aimed at enhancing the design of the haptic elements of the RSP-1 IOL. This monolithic IOL features plate haptics adorned with precisely crafted holes of specific shapes and sizes.

Suturing with the modernised IOL model was undertaken in eight patients to address intraocular correction of aphakia. The aetiology of aphakia was closed eye trauma of Type A III.

Preoperative visual acuity ranged from 0.01 to 0.7 with aphakic correction, whilst Intraocular pressure ranged from 15 to 20 mmHg.

Suturing this IOL model requires the use of two straight needles interconnected by thread. A puncture is made with a 30G guide needle at a point 2 mm from the limbus within the projection of the ciliary sulcus in the inner segment. Subsequently, through a paracentesis at the 3 o’clock position, the needles are alternately passed beneath the haptic part of the IOL and then withdrawn from the eye at the 9 o’clock position within the projection of the ciliary sulcus. This manoeuvre forms a loop that captures the haptic part of the IOL. Similarly, fixation of the haptic part of the IOL Is achieved in the opposing segment through other V-shaped holes. Repositioning and fixation of the IOL within the projection of the ciliary sulcus is accomplished by pulling the ends of the threads extracted from the eye.

Results: In the postoperative period in all cases, stable IOL position was fixed and IOL was centered. Visual acuity: ranged from 0.2 to 0.9 with correction, whilst Intraocular Pressure (IOP) ranged from 11 to 17 mmHg. The picture obtained by ultrasound biomicroscopy indicates the central position of the IOL.

Conclusion: The proposed modification of IOL RSP -1 with four haptic holes has a number of advantages: import substitution, injector implantation of IOL through a small incision. The shape and location of the holes allow to perform atraumatic and clearly controlled IOL suturing regardless of the pupil diameter. Four-point fixation of the IOL within the ciliary sulcus projection ensures a reliable, stable and anatomically functional position of the IOL. Additionally, the monoblock design serves as a barrier-optical membrane during combined vitreoretinal surgery without obstructing eye fundus visualisation. This IOL model is versatile and suitable for both capsular and extracapsular fixation.

 Keywords: Intraocular Lens; RSP-1; Domestic IOL Model; Guide Needle; Ciliary Sulcus

  1. Shchuko AG., et al. “Risk factors and complications arising from late spontaneous dislocations of the complex “posterior chamber IOL - capsular bag” into the vitreous body”. Fyodorov Journal of Ophthalmic Surgery 1 (2017): 21-26.
  2. Potyomkin VV and Ageeva EV. “Zonular instability in patients with pseudoexfoliative syndrome: the analysis of 1000 consecutive phacoemulsifications”. Ophthalmology Journal1 (2018): 41-46.
  3. Küchle M., et al. “Anterior chamber depth and complications during cataract surgery in eyes with pseudoexfoliation syndrome”. American Journal of Ophthalmology 3 (2000): 281-285.
  4. Schlötzer-Schrehardt U and Naumann GO. “A histopathologic study of zonular instability in pseudoexfoliation syndrome”. American Journal of Ophthalmology 6 (1994): 730-743.
  5. Shingleton BJ., et al. “Outcome of phacoemulsification and intraocular lens implantation in eyes with pseudoexfoliation and weak zonules”. Acta Ophthalmologica2 (2016): 182-187.
  6. Belonozhenko YV and Sorokin EL. “Long-term outcomes of phacoemulsification for lens subluxation with implantation of iridovitreal IOL RSP-3”. X Congress of Ophthalmologists of Russia: Scientific Materials. М (2015): 232.
  7. Ioshin IE. “Extracapsular fixation of IOL at pathology of the crystalline lens in complicated situations”. Cand. Dr. of Medical Sciences. М (1998): 298.
  8. Omiadze MR. “Correction of aphakia with intraocular lenses from collagen copolymer (clinical and experimental studies)”. Author’s abstract of candidate of medical sciences. М (1992): 22.
  9. Fedorov SN., et al. “Correction of aphakia by implantation of IOLs from a new biocompatible material - collagen copolymer (first experience of application)”. Ophthalmosurgery 2 (1992): 24-29.
  10. Fedorov SN., et al. “Results of implantation of elastic intraocular lenses made of collagen copolymer on the surface of the vitreous body during extraction of traumatic cataracts”. Ophthalmosurgery 4 (1994): 3-7.
  11. Egorova AV., et al. “Results of surgical treatment of IOL dislocation”. Ophthalmic Surgery 1 (2017): 6-9.
  12. Canabrava S., et al. “Scleral fixation of a 4-eyelet foldable intraocular lens in patients with aphakia using a 4-flanged technique”. Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery 2 (2021): 265-269.
  13. Lewis JS. “Ab externo sulcus fixation”. Ophthalmic Surgery11 (1991): 692-695.
  14. Clinical Guidelines Closed Eye Trauma (2020).
  15. McAllister AS and Hirst LW. “Visual outcomes and complications of scleral-fixated posterior chamber intraocular lenses”. Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery 7 (2011): 1263-1269.
  16. Tong N., et al. “Pigment dispersion syndrome and pigmentary glaucoma after secondary sulcus transscleral fixation of single-piece foldable posterior chamber intraocular lenses in Chinese aphakic patients”. Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery 5 (2017): 639-642.
  17. Kumar S., et al. “Visual outcome, and complications of various techniques of secondary intraocular lens”. Oman Journal of Ophthalmology 3 (2017): 198-204.
  18. Drolsum L. “Long-term follow-up of secondary flexible, open-loop, anterior chamber intraocular lenses”. Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery 3 (2003): 498-503.
  19. Kawaji T., et al. “Sutureless intrascleral intraocular lens fixation with lamellar dissection of scleral tunnel”. Clinical Ophthalmology 10 (2016): 227-231.
  20. Agarwal A., et al. “Handshake technique for glued intrascleral haptic fixation of a posterior chamber intraocular lens”. Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery 3 (2013): 317-322.
  21. Kislitsyna NM., et al. “Method of intraocular lens repositioning with suture fixation in the ciliary sulcus (clinical case)”. Saratov Scientific Medical Journal2 (2020): 599-602.
  22. Kozhukhov AA., et al. “Sclerocorneal fixation of posterior chamber intraocular lenses in complicated cases of cataract surgery”. Modern technologies of cataract and refractive surgery 1 (2011): 21-29.
  23. Faizrakhmanov RR., et al. “Transscleral IOL fixation. From complex to simple”. Ufa: Bashkir Encyclopedia (2020): 104.

Kislitsyna NM., et al. "Modern Methods of Aphakia Correction with Domestically Produced Intraocular Lens." EC Ophthalmology 15.11 (2024): 01-11.