Research Article Volume 16 Issue 3 - 2025

Double Trigeminal Territory Block Ultrasound-Guided with blunt cannula for Dacryocystorhinostomy in a Day-Clinic Setting: Evaluation of Two Techniques with Propensity Score Analysis

Hugo Camara Tinoco de Siqueira1*, Theo Ramalho Morais2 and Clarissa Maria Motta Stoffel de Siqueira3

1Chief of Department of Anesthesiology, Centro de Estudos e Pesquisas Oculistas Associados (CEPOA), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil 2Department of Ophthalmology, Centro de Estudos e Pesquisas Oculistas Associados (CEPOA), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil 3Department of Lacrimal Pathway, Oculoplastics, Centro Carioca do Olho, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

*Corresponding Author: Hugo Camara Tinoco de Siqueira, Chief of Department of Anesthesiology, Centro de Estudos e Pesquisas Oculistas Associados (CEPOA), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Received: February 04, 2025; Published: September 30, 2025



Lower complete lacrimonasal duct obstruction is a multifactorial disorder that affects tear drainage, ranging from mild symptoms like epiphora to severe cases like dacryocystitis, abscesses, fistulas, or even meningoencephalitis. It typically peaks in early childhood and in the sixth decade of life, particularly in post-menopausal women. Surgical intervention, specifically external dacryocystorhinostomy (ED) with silicone intubation, is considered the gold standard for treatment due to its long-term effectiveness and low recurrence rate. Historically mentioned in the Hammurabi Code (2250 B.C.), the technique has evolved significantly since Toti's description in 1904, incorporating antibiotics and bicanalicular silicone tube intubation. General anesthesia with endotracheal intubation remains common, but loco-regional anesthesia (LRA) is gaining interest for its benefits, including shorter hospitalization, minimal post-operative analgesia, faster recovery, and reduced bleeding. The present study compares two LRA based techniques in a new protocol, named "Double Trigeminal Territory Block". In this retrospective bi-interventional work, 512 cases were enrolled, 218 for group A, and 294, for group B, with the following data retrieved: surgery date, gender, age, initial anesthetic volume bolus (IAV), final anesthetic volume (FAV), anesthetic difference (AD), supplementary sedation required (SS) and analgesic consumption before hospital discharge (AC1), until 24h after (AC2), after 24h until 07 days (AC3) and after 07 days, until 30 days (AC4), time to hospital discharge (HD) and possible adverse events. A logistic regression model was used to calculate the propensity scores, and the summary of the regression model showed that the variables age, FAV, AC1, and HD were significantly associated with the outcome. The odds ratios (OR) for the significant variables were calculated and indicated that increased age and FAV (marked by the technique change) had a higher probability of the outcome and lower results for AC1 and HD, being the significant variables in determining the outcome in the propensity score model. The analyses indicate the importance of these variables in predicting the results for the intervention groups and that the proposed technique changes, despite increasing the initial anesthetic volume, reduced associated morbidity rates, with a drastic reduction in the number and types of anesthetic or analgesic rescue interventions during surgery, associated with an assumed increase in overall comfort level and an average reduction in hospital discharge time. The authors concluded that both “Double Trigeminal Territory Block” protocols were effective, with the one utilized in group B associated with better outcomes and, thus, recommended for practice.

 Keywords: Dacryocystorhinostomy; Local-Anesthesia; Blunt Cannula; Ultrasound; Outpatient

  1. Thompson CJ. “Review of the diagnosis and management of acquired nasolacrimal duct obstruction”. Optometry2 (2001) 103-111.
  2. Mainville N and Jordan DR. “Etiology of tearing: a retrospective analysis of referrals to a tertiary care oculoplastics practice”. Ophthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery 3 (2011): 155-157.
  3. Nemet AY. “The etiology of epiphora: A multifactorial issue”. Seminars in Ophthalmology3 (2016): 275-279.
  4. Lee JM and Baek JS. “Etiology of epiphora”. Korean Journal of Ophthalmology 5 (2021): 349-354.
  5. Craig JP., et al. “TFOS lifestyle report executive summary: a lifestyle epidemic - ocular surface disease”. The Ocular Surface 30 (2023): 240-253.
  6. Patel J., et al. “Epiphora clinical testing”. In: StatPearls. StatPearls Publishing, Treasure Island (FL) (2023).
  7. Ceylanoglu KS., et al. “Overview of epiphora referred to oculoplastic surgery clinic in adults”. Beyoglu Eye Journal 1 (2023): 45-49.
  8. Toti A. “Nuovo metodo conservatore di cura radicle delle suppurazoni croniche del sacco lacrimale (Dacriocistorinostomia)”. Clinica Moderna Firenze 10 (1904): 385-387.
  9. Ball JM. “The proper treatment for acute suppurative dacryocystitis”. American Journal of Ophthalmology 4 (1921): 447-448.
  10. RP Sarda., et al. “Dacryocystorhinostomy”. British Journal of Ophthalmology 2 (1961): 138-143.
  11. Dortzbach RK. “Dacryocystorhinostomy”. Ophthalmology12 (1978): 1267-1270.
  12. Hughes SM. “The history of lacrimal surgery”. Advances in Ophthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery 5 (1986): 139-168.
  13. Hurwitz JJ., et al. “Outcome of lacrimal surgery in the elderly”. Canadian Journal of Ophthalmology 1 (2000): 18-22.
  14. Duffy MT. “Advances in lacrimal surgery”. Current Opinion in Ophthalmology 5 (2000): 352-356.
  15. Woog JJ., et al. “Endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy: a report by the American Academy of Ophthalmology”. Ophthalmology12 (2001): 2369-2377.
  16. Moore WMH., et al. “Functional and anatomic results after two types of endoscopic endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy: surgical and holmium laser”. Ophthalmology8 (2002): 1575-1582.
  17. Feng YF., et al. “A meta-analysis of primary dacryocystorhinostomy with and without silicone intubation”. Canadian Journal of Ophthalmology6 (2011): 521-527.
  18. Jawaheer L., et al. “Endonasal versus external dacryocystorhinostomy for nasolacrimal duct obstruction”. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews2 (2017): CD007097.
  19. Ing EB., et al. “Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials in dacryocystorhinostomy with and without silicone intubation”. Canadian Journal of Ophthalmology5 (2018): 466-470.
  20. Sobel RK., et al. “A comparison of endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy and external dacryocystorhinostomy: a report by the American Academy of Ophthalmology”. Ophthalmology11 (2019): 1580-1585.
  21. Rajabi MT., et al. “External versus endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy for primary acquired nasolacrimal duct obstruction”. Middle East African Journal of Ophthalmology 1 (2022): 1-6.
  22. Vinciguerra A., et al. “Endoscopic and external dacryocystorhinostomy: A therapeutic proposal for distal acquired lacrimal obstructions”. European Journal of Ophthalmology 3 (2023): 1287-1293.
  23. Mailer CM and Webster AC. “Controlled sedation, sphenopalatine and nasociliary blocks, and bloodless flap suturing in dacryocystorhinostomy”. Canadian Journal of Ophthalmology5 (1982): 189-193.
  24. Gross J B., et al. “A suitable substitute for 4% cocaine before blind nasotracheal intubation: 3% lidocaine-0.25% phenylephrine spray”. Anesthesia and Analgesia 10 (1984): 915-918.
  25. Kratky V., et al. “Dacryocystorhinostomy in elderly patients: Regional anesthesia without cocaine”. Canadian Journal of Ophthalmology1 (1994): 13-16.
  26. GL Fanning. “Local anaesthesia for dacryocystorhinostomy”. Current Anaesthesia and Critical Care6 (2000): 306-309.
  27. McNab AA and Simmie RJ. “Effectiveness of local anesthesia for external dacryocystorhinostomy”. Clinical Experience Ophthalmology4 (2002): 270-272.
  28. Caesar RH and McNab AA. “External dacryocystorhinostomy and local anesthesia: technique to measure minimized blood loss”. Ophthalmic Plastic Reconstructive Surgery1 (2004): 57-59.
  29. Ciftci F., et al. “Local versus general anesthesia for external dacryocystorhinostomy in young patients”. Ophthalmic Plastic Reconstructive Surgery3 (2005): 201-206.
  30. Harissi-Dagher M., et al. “Comparison of anesthetic and surgical outcomes of dacryocystorhinostomy using loco-regional versus general anesthesia”. Digital Journal of Opthalmology 14 (2008): 1-6.
  31. Maheshwari R. “Single-prick infiltration anesthesia for external dacryocystorhinostomy”. Orbit 2 (2008): 79-82.
  32. Harissi-Dagher M., et al. “Comparison of anesthetic and surgical outcomes of dacryocystorhinostomy using loco-regional versus general anesthesia”. Digital Journal of Ophthalmology 14 (2008): 1-6.
  33. Chaume A., et al. “External dacryocystorhinostomy under local anesthesia and sedation”. Journal Français d’Ophthalmologie 2 (2010): 77-83.
  34. Knezevic MM., et al. “Pain during external dacryocystorhinostmy with local anesthesia”. Medical Science Monitor6 (2011): CR341-CR346.
  35. Tawfik HA and Youssef OR. “Simplified local anesthesia technique for external dacryocystorhinostomy without nasal packing: a new technique and pilot study outcome”. Clinic Ophthalmology 7 (2013): 2265-2270.
  36. Sagiv O., et al. “Dacryocystorhinostomy (DCR) under local anesthesia”. Harefuah2 (2015): 110-113.
  37. Dumas GA., et al. “Safety comparison of laryngeal mask use with endotracheal intubation in patients undergoing dacryocystorhinostomy surgery”. Ophthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery4 (2018): 324-328.
  38. Siqueira H., et al. “New anesthetic technique for dacryocystorhinostomy: 218 cases with local-anesthesia ultrasonographic guided and blunt cannula”. Open Journal of Ophthalmology4 (2021): 282-292.
  39. Aytogan H., et al. “Outcomes of external dacryocystorhinostomy under general and local anesthetics in a tertiary clinic”. Beyoglu Eye Journal1 (2022): 25-29.
  40. Dresner SC., et al. “Outpatient dacryocystorhinostomy”. Ophthalmic Surgery 4 (1991): 222-224.
  41. Jordan DR. “Avoiding blood loss in outpatient DCR”. Ophthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery4 (1991): 261-266.
  42. Benger R. “Day-surgery external dacryocystorhinostomy”. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Ophthalmology3 (1992): 243-245.
  43. Benatar-Haserfaty J., et al. “Outpatient external dacryocystorhinostomy under regional anesthesia and sedation”. Revista Española de Anestesiologia e Reanimacion 1 (2007): 23-28.
  44. Friedberg MA., et al. “An alternative technique of local anesthesia for vitreoretinal surgery”. Archives of Ophthalmology 11 (1991): 1615-1616.
  45. Wald KJ and Weiter JJ. “Modified technique of blunt cannula retrobulbar anesthesia for vitreoretinal surgery”. Ophthalmic Surgery, Lasers and Imaging Retina5 (1993): 336-338.
  46. Bergman L., et al. “Limbal sub-Tenon's administration of retrobulbar anesthesia using a blunt irrigating cannula”. Ophthalmic Surgery, Lasers and Imaging Retina2 (1996): 106-112.
  47. Jimenez F. “Blunt needles (microcannulae) for infiltrating local anesthetics”. Dermatologic Surgery 3 (2012): 511-512.
  48. Garcia CP., et al. “Anesthesia using microcannula and sharp needle in upper blepharoplasty: A randomized, double-blind clinical trial evaluating pain, bruising, and ecchymoses”. Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery 2 (2021): 364-369.
  49. Siqueira H., et al. “Ultrasound-guided peribulbar block with blunt canula for cataract surgery: a review of historical case-series”. Open Journal of Ophthalmology3 (2022): 322-334.
  50. Pedro Acevedo and Dilip Das-Gupta. “The measurement of the spatial average temporal average in-tensity Isata and ultrasonic power W in composite ultrasonic transducers for medical application”. Ultrasonics1-8 (2002): 819-821.
  51. Tsui BCH. “Ultrasound imaging to localize foramina for superficial trigeminal nerve block”. Canadian Journal of Anesthesia9 (2009): 704-706.
  52. Sola C., et al. “Ultrasound guidance characteristics and efficiency of suprazygomatic maxillary nerve blocks in infants: a descriptive prospective study”. Pediatric Anesthesia9 (2012): 841-846.
  53. Randy L King., et al. “Quantification of temperature rise within the lens of the porcine eye caused by ultrasound insonation”. Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology2 (2017): 476-481.
  54. Aldrete JA and Kroulik D. “A postanesthetic recovery score”. Anesthesia and Analgesia6 (1970): 924.
  55. Palumbo P., et al. “Modified PADSS (Post Anaesthetic Discharge Scoring System) for monitoring outpatients discharge”. Annali Italiani di Chirurgia6 (2012): 661-665.

Hugo Camara Tinoco de Siqueira., et al. “Double Trigeminal Territory Block Ultrasound-Guided with blunt cannula for Dacryocystorhinostomy in a Day-Clinic Setting: Evaluation of Two Techniques with Propensity Score Analysis”. EC Ophthalmology  16.3 (2025): 01-12.