EC Ophthalmology

Research Article Volume 17 Issue 5 - 2026

Anti-VEGF Treatment Outcome of Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration: A Low-Income Country Experience

Kirubel Tesfaye1 and Dereje Negussie2*

1Ophthalmology Resident, Department of Ophthalmology, School of Medicine, Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
2Assistant Professor of Ophthalmology, Department of Ophthalmology, School of Medicine, Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia

*Corresponding Author:Dereje Negussie, Assistant Professor of Ophthalmology, Department of Ophthalmology, School of Medicine, Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Received: March 05, 2026; Published: April 08, 2026



Purpose: To evaluate the real-world outcomes of anti-VEGF treatment for neovascular age-related macular degeneration (NvAMD) in a low-income country setting.

Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted at Nisir Specialized Eye Clinic in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, involving 159 eyes of 142 patients who received at least three intravitreal anti-VEGF injections from September 2021 to August 2023. The primary outcome was the change in central macular thickness (CMT); secondary outcomes included improvements in visual acuity (VA), the number of injections, and complications.

Results: A total of 159 eyes of 142 study participants were included in this study; the mean age of participants was 68.7 years; 52.8% were female. Bevacizumab was used in 79.2% of cases, with a mean of 3.42 injections per eye. Baseline mean CMT was 358.50 µm, reducing to 256.93 µm at 3 months and 258.55 µm at 12 months (mean reduction of 104.22 µm and 118.42 µm, respectively). Visual acuity improved from 20/400 - 20/630 at baseline to 20/50 - 20/200 in 46.5% of eyes by 3 and 12 months. Only baseline CMT was significantly associated with 3-month VA (p < 0.001). Most patients (83.6%) discontinued treatment after three injections, primarily due to financial constraints. Complications were observed in 4.4% of eyes, with endophthalmitis being the most common.

Conclusion: Anti-VEGF treatment in this low-income setting showed modest improvements in CMT and VA, but outcomes were limited by under-treatment, largely due to cost. This underscores the need for resource-adjusted treatment protocols and enhanced patient support to improve long-term outcomes.

Keywords: anti-VEGF; Nv AMD

  1. Deng Y., et al. “Age-related macular degeneration: Epidemiology, genetics, pathophysiology, diagnosis, and targeted therapy”. Genes and Diseases 1 (2022): 62-79.
  2. Lim LS., et al. “Age-related macular degeneration”. The Lancet9827 (2012): 1728-1738.
  3. Wong WL., et al. “Global prevalence of age-related macular degeneration and disease burden projection for 2020 and 2040: a systematic review and meta-analysis”. The Lancet Global Health 2 (2014): e106-e116.
  4. Mathenge W., et al. “Prevalence of age-related macular degeneration in Nakuru, Kenya: A cross-sectional population-based study”. PLOS Medicine2 (2013): e1001393.
  5. Age-Related Eye Disease Study Research Group. “The age-related eye disease study severity scale for age-related macular degeneration: AREDS report no. 17”. Archives of Ophthalmology 11 (2005): 1484-1498.
  6. Flores R., et al. “Age-related macular degeneration: pathophysiology, management, and future perspectives”. Ophthalmologica6 (2021): 495-511.
  7. Gragoudas Evangelos S., et al. “Pegaptanib for neovascular age-related macular degeneration”. New England Journal of Medicine 27 (2004): 2805-2816.
  8. Bloch SB., et al. “Predictors of 1-year visual outcome in neovascular age-related macular degeneration following intravitreal ranibizumab treatment”. Acta Ophthalmologica (Copenh)1 (2013): 42-47.
  9. Smith W., et al. “Risk factors for age-related macular degeneration: Pooled findings from three continents”. Ophthalmology4 (2001): 697-704.
  10. Wykoff CC., et al. “Optimizing Anti-VEGF treatment outcomes for patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration”. Journal of Managed Care and Specialty Pharmacy 2 (2018): S3-S15.
  11. Rosenfeld Philip J., et al. “Ranibizumab for neovascular age-related macular degeneration”. New England Journal of Medicine 14 (2006): 1419-1431.
  12. Bek T and Klug SE. “Age, sex, and type of medication predict the effect of anti-VEGF treatment on central retinal thickness in wet age-related macular degeneration”. Clinical Ophthalmology 12 (2018): 473-479.
  13. Rayess N., et al. “Treatment outcomes after 3 years in neovascular age-related macular degeneration using a treat-and-extend regimen”. American Journal of Ophthalmology 1 (2015): 3-8.e1.
  14. Amoaku WM., et al. “Defining response to anti-VEGF therapies in neovascular AMD”. Eye6 (2015): 721-731.
  15. Yousuf SJ., et al. “Neovascular age-related macular degeneration in a predominantly black population”. Ophthalmic Surgery, Lasers and Imaging Retina 10 (2023): 580-584.
  16. Park DH., et al. “A comparison of responses to intravitreal bevacizumab, ranibizumab, or aflibercept injections for neovascular age-related macular degeneration”. International Ophthalmology 5 (2017): 1205-1214.
  17. Korva-Gurung I., et al. “Visual outcomes of anti-VEGF treatment on neovascular age-related macular degeneration: a real-world population-based cohort study”. Pharmaceuticals7 (2023): 927.
  18. Silva R., et al. “Treat-and-Extend versus monthly regimen in neovascular age-related macular degeneration: results with ranibizumab from the TREND study”. Ophthalmology1 (2018): 57-65.

Kirubel Tesfaye and Dereje Negussie. “Anti-VEGF Treatment Outcome of Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration: A Low- Income Country Experience”. EC Ophthalmology 17.4 (2026): 01-07.