EC Nursing and Healthcare

Research Article Volume 4 Issue 8 - 2022

Use of Educational Technology to Promote Self-Care for the Elderly: Integrative Review

Arydyjany Goncalves Nascimento1*, Francisca Patricia Barreto de Carvalho2, Kelianny Pinheiro Bezerra3, Fernanda Gomes da Silva4 and Deyla Moura Ramos5

1Programa de Pós-Graduação em Saúde e Sociedade, Universidade do Estado do Rio Grande do Norte, Rua Werneck Jerônimo dos Santos, Bairro Colorado, Cajazeiras; Paraíba, Brazil

2Programa de Pós-Graduação em Saúde e Sociedade; Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte, Brazil

3Faculdade de Enfermagem, Universidade do Estado do Rio Grande do Norte, Brazil

4Residência em Atenção Básica/Saúde da Família e Comunidade, Universidade do Estado do Rio Grande do Norte, Brazil

5Departamento de Enfermagem, Centro Universitário FACEX, Brazil

*Corresponding Author: Arydyjany Gonçalves Nascimento, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Saúde e Sociedade, Universidade do Estado do Rio Grande do Norte, Rua Werneck Jerônimo dos Santos, Bairro Colorado, Cajazeiras; Paraíba, Brazil.
Received: June 01, 2021; Published: July 27, 2022



Objective: The objective is to identify in the scientific literature the use of educational technology to promote self-care for the elderly.

Method: This is an integrative review that included original articles indexed in the Latin American and Caribbean Literature in Health Sciences, Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online, Scopus, Web of Science, Science Direct, Cochrane and Google Scholar databases, in English, Portuguese and Spanish, published in the last five years, through the use of the Boolean operators “AND” or “OR”.

Results: Nine articles were selected, with a predominance of experimental studies that tested the effects of technologies and of the experience report type. The technologies developed were group dynamics, use of puppets, storytelling, multimedia production and use of internet/computer programs, which portrayed care for non-communicable chronic diseases.

Conclusion: The technologies used showed efficiency for the redefinition of self-care for the elderly.

Keywords: Elderly Health; Health Education; Educational Technology; Health Promotion

  1. Costa MFL. “Aging and public health: the Brazilian Longitudinal Study of Aging (ELSI-Brazil)”. Revista de Saúde Pública (2018): 52.
  2. Miranda GMD., et al. “The Brazilian population aging: current and future social challenges and consequences”. Revista Brasileira de Geriatria e3 (2016): 507-519.
  3. Medeiros KKAS., et al. “The challenge of integrality in elderly care in the scope of Primary Health Care”. Saúde Debate3 (2017): 288-289.
  4. Jed Alves. “The demographic transition and the window of opportunity”. São Paulo: Fernand Braudel Institute of World Economics (2018).
  5. Salbego C. “Cuidative-educational technologies: an emerging concept of nurses' praxis in the hospital context”. Revista Brasileira de Sick6 (2018): 2666-2674.
  6. Nietsche EA. “Emancipatory technology: possibility for nursing praxis”. First Edition. Santa Catarina: UNIJUÍ (2000).
  7. Maniva SJCF., et al. “Educational Technologies for health education on stroke: an integrative review”. Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem4 (2018): 1724-1731.
  8. Whittemore R and Knalf K. “The integrative review: updated methodology”. Journal of Advanced Nursing 5 (2005): 546-553.
  9. Lockwood C., et al. “Chapter 2: Systematic reviews of qualitative evidence”. In: Aromataris E, Munn Z, editors. JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis. JBI (2020).
  10. Marziale MH. “Instrument for data collection integrative review” (2015).
  11. Gomes R. “Analysis and interpretation of qualitative research data”. In: Minayo MCS (org.). Social Research: theory, method and creativity. Petrópolis: Voices (2011): 79-108.
  12. Melnyk BM and Fineout-Overholt H. “Evidence-based practice in nursing and healthcare: a guide to best practice”. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins (2005).
  13. Mohed D., et al. “Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement”. PLOS Medicine (2009): 1000097.
  14. Ministry of Health (BR). Department of Health Care. Department of Primary Care. Aging and health of the healthy/Ministry of Health, Health Care Secretariat. Brasilia (2016).
  15. Ministry of Health (BR). Department of Health Care. Department of Primary Care. Strategies for the care of people with chronic disease: obesity. Brasilia: Ministry of Health (2014).
  16. Francescato CFL., et al. “The role of the old women in the promotion of health in Primary Care”. Pajar 2 (2017): 62-68.
  17. Merhy EE. “Health: The Cartography of Living Work”. São Paulo, Hucitec (2002).
  18. GWS fields. Paidea Health. São Paulo: Hucitec (2010).
  19. Abreu SSS., et al. “Prevalence of chronic non-communicable diseases in the Elderly of a city in the interior of Bahia”. Id on Line”. Rev. Mult. Psic. 11.38 (2017): 552-562.
  20. Machado WD., et al. “Elderly with not transmitted chronic diseases: a group association study”. Reon Facema 2 (2017): 444-451.
  21. Araujo SNM. “Technologies aimed at the care of the elderly in health services: an integrative review”. Infirmaries Global Magazine 46 (2017): 579-595.
  22. Cardoso RSS., et al. “Educational technology: a dynamic tool for caring for the elderly”. Revista Brasileira de Sick 2 (2018): 786-792.

Arydyjany Goncalves Nascimento., et al. Use of Educational Technology to Promote Self-Care for the Elderly: Integrative Review. EC Nursing and Healthcare  4.8 (2022): 24-35.