EC Gynaecology

Case Series Volume 13 Issue 4 - 2024

Treatment of Ectopic Pregnancy with Methotrexate: Opportunities and Challenges in a Developing Country Context

VM Lema*

FCOG Professor of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Vice President - ECSACOG, Nairobi, Kenya

*Corresponding Author: VM Lema, FCOG Professor of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Vice President - ECSACOG, Nairobi, Kenya.
Received: March 09, 2024; Published: March 22, 2024



Management of ectopic pregnancy has improved globally in the past four or so decades, resulting in reduced associated morbidity and mortality, despite an increase in its incidence. Improved awareness, availability of and access to quality healthcare services, as well as diagnostic capabilities, have enabled early and accurate diagnosis thereof.

Early diagnosis gives the clinicians a wider range of treatment options among which is the medical approach using intramuscular methotrexate, a folic acid antagonist. This is now widely used as first-line treatment for haemodynamically stable patients. It however has its limitations and requires adherence to strict guidelines and instructions. The patient is required to make weekly follow up visits, after initiating treatment, with estimation of β-hCG level until it drops to non-pregnant levels, which considered an indicator of successful treatment among other instructions.

While methotrexate has been and continues to be used successfully for the treatment of ectopic pregnancy in developed countries, its use in developing countries such as those in sub-Saharan Africa remains very limited. There’s paucity of published data from the Region despite having the highest incidence rates of ectopic pregnancy globally. However there’re potential opportunities for its use in the region, if we address the related challenges.

This paper presents an initial experience with the use of methotrexate in East Africa by the author. It shows possible opportunities and situations it can be used successfully while highlighting inherent challenges with its use.

 Keywords: Ectopic Pregnancy; Methotrexate; Opportunities and Challenges; Developing Counties

    1. Walker JJ. “Ectopic pregnancy”. Clinical Obstetrics and Gynecology 1 (2007): 89-99.
    2. Zhang S., et al. “Global burden and trends of ectopic pregnancy: An observational trend study from 1990 to 2019”. PLoS One10 (2023): e0291316.
    3. Goyaux N., et al. “Ectopic pregnancy in African developing countries”. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica 4 (2003): 305-312.
    4. “ACOG practice bulletin no. 193: tubal ectopic pregnancy [published correction appears in Obstet Gynecol. 2019 133(5): 1059]”. Obstetrics and Gynecology 3 (2018): e91-e103.
    5. Lee JH., et al. “A risk prediction model for medical treatment failure in tubal pregnancy”. European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology 225 (2018): 148-154.
    6. Condous G., et al. “The accuracy of transvaginal ultrasonography for the diagnosis of ectopic pregnancy prior to surgery”. Human Reproduction 5 (2005): 1404-1409.
    7. Connolly A., et al. “Re-evaluation of discriminatory and threshold levels for serum β-hCG in early pregnancy”. Obstetrics and Gynecology 1 (2013): 65-70.
    8. Barnhart K., et al. “Use of “2-dose” regimen of MTX to treat ectopic pregnancy”. Fertility and Sterility 2 (2007): 250-256.
    9. Yang C., et al. “Multiple-dose and double-dose versus single-dose administration of methotrexate for the treatment of ectopic pregnancy: A systematic review and meta-analysis”. Reproductive BioMedicine Online 4 (2017): 383-391.
    10. Zargar M., et al. “Comparision of single and multidose of methotrexate in medical treatment of ectopic pregnancy”. Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences 4 (2008): 586-589.
    11. Song T., et al. “Single-dose versus two-dose administration of methotrexate for the treatment of ectopic pregnancy: a randomized controlled trial”. Human Reproduction2 (2016): 332-338.
    12. Hamed HO., et al. “Comparison of double- and single-dose methotrexate protocols for treatment of ectopic pregnancy”. International Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics 1 (2012): 67-71.
    13. Barnhart K., et al. “Use of "2- dose" regimen of methotrexate to treat ectopic pregnancy”. Fertility and Sterility 2 (2007): 250-256.
    14. Lesavre M., et al. “[Treatment of tubal ectopic pregnancy by methotrexate]”. Journal de Gynécologie Obstétrique et Biologie de la Reproduction (Paris) 3 (2015): 212-219.
    15. Hajenius P and Mello N. “Conservative management of tubal ectopic pregnancy”. In D. Jurkovic and R. Farquharson (Eds.), Acute Gynaecology and Early Pregnancy (Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists Advanced Skills). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (2011): 133-144.
    16. Hsu JY., et al. “Disparities in the management of ectopic pregnancy”. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 1 (2017): 49.e1-49.e10.
    17. Lawani OL., et al. “Ectopic pregnancy: a life-threatening gynecological emergency”. International Journal of Women's Health 5 (2013): 515-521.
    18. Panti A., et al. “Ectopic pregnancy at Usmanu Danfodiyo University Teaching Hospital Sokoto: a ten year review”. Annals of Nigerian Medicine 2 (2012): 87-91.
    19. Pereira N., et al. “Routine monitoring of liver, renal, and hematologic tests after single- or double-dose methotrexate treatment for ectopic pregnancies after in vitro fertilization”. Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology 7 (2015): 1266-1270.
    20. Ankum WM., et al. “Management of suspected ectopic pregnancy. Impact of new diagnostic tools in 686 consecutive cases”. Journal of Reproductive Medicine 10 (1996): 724-728.
    21. Barash JH., et al. “Diagnosis and management of ectopic pregnancy”. American Family Physician 1 (2014): 34-40.
    22. Lipscomb GH., et al. “Comparison of multidose and single- dose methotrexate protocols for the treatment of ectopic pregnancy”. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 6 (2005): 1844-1848.
    23. Sara HG and Uzelac PS. “Early pregnancy risks”. In: DeCherney AH, Nathan L, Goodwin MT, Laufer N, editors. Current Diagnosis and Treatment: Obstetrics and Gynecology. 10th Columbus (OH): McGraw-Hill (2007): 259-272.
    24. Creanga AA., et al. “Pregnancy-related mortality in the United States, 2011-2013”. Obstetrics and Gynaecology 2 (2017): 366-373.
    25. Zhang J., et al. “Predictors and clinical features of methotrexate (MTX) therapy for ectopic pregnancy”. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth1 (2020): 654.
    26. Hardeman J and Weiss BD. “Intrauterine devices: an update”. American Family Physician 6 (2014): 445-450.
    27. Lozeau AM and Potter B. “Diagnosis and management of ectopic pregnancy”. American Family Physician 9 (2005): 1707-1714.
    28. Hackmon R., et al. “Effect of methotrexate treatment of ectopic pregnancy on subsequent pregnancy”. Canadian Family Physician1 (2011): 37-39.
    29. Crochet JR., et al. “Does this woman have an ectopic pregnancy?: the rational clinical examination systematic review”. Journal of the American Medical Association 16 (2013): 1722-1729.
    30. Igwebe AO., et al. “An appraisal of the management of ectopic pregnancy in a Nigerian tertiary Hospital”. Annals of Medical and Health Science Research 2 (2013): 166-170.
    31. De Waard L., et al. “Retrospective review of the medical management of ectopic pregnancies with methotrexate at a South African tertiary hospital”. South African Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 3 (2014): 84-87.

VM Lema. "Treatment of Ectopic Pregnancy with Methotrexate: Opportunities and Challenges in a Developing Country Context". EC Gynaecology 13.4 (2024): 01-08.