EC Gynaecology

Research Article Volume 12 Issue 7 - 2023

The Current State of Medical Informatics Curricula in Undergraduate Medical Education: A National Survey

Dani Zoorob1*, Lauren Leiby2, Camille Bratton2, Catherine VanHook2 and Anita Tamirisa3

1Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Louisiana State University (LSU) Health Sciences Center at Shreveport, Shreveport, LA, USA

2College of Medicine and Life Sciences, University of Toledo, Toledo, OH, USA

3Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Advocate Illinois Masonic, Chicago, IL, USA

*Corresponding Author: Dani Zoorob, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Louisiana State University (LSU) Health Sciences Center at Shreveport, Shreveport, LA, USA.
Received: June 07, 2023; Published: June 21, 2023



Introduction: The Medical School Objectives Project (MSOP) focuses on the competencies integrated in medical school curricula. As student education in informatics was not deemed as intrinsic to achieving competency, the penetrance and format of integration have varied across medical institutions.

Purpose: The primary goal of this study was to describe the integration of medical informatics (MI) currently in curricula across medical schools within the United States.

Methods: This is an IRB-approved cross-sectional national survey conducted between January and April 2022. The survey focused on the presence of medical informatics in curricula across US-based allopathic and osteopathic medical schools.

Results: The response rate was 40% (77 out of 192) with up to 50% of respondents reporting formal integration in their UME curricula. The material was offered in elective format (67%), integrated into existing required courses (23%), and as stand-alone required courses (10%); however, only 20% reported seamless integration into the curriculum. In-person lectures (63%) and online modules (27%) were the main formats utilized with 61% initiating learner exposure in the preclinical years. The topics included clinical decision support (46%), reference searching (24%), EHR use (23%), and security and ethics in healthcare (19%). Up to 37% of the educators were informatics-credentialed faculty, 27% had supplementary training permitting informatics mentoring, and the rest were medical librarians.

Conclusion: Undergraduate medical education has no required medical informatics curriculum, resulting in varied exposure and training among medical schools. Students may benefit long-term from competencies set up by educational regulatory bodies.

Keywords: Competency; Curriculum; Informatics; Medical Education; Students; Survey

  1. Kulikowski CA., et al. “AMIA Board white paper: definition of biomedical informatics and specification of core competencies for graduate education in the discipline”. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 6 (2012): 931-938.
  2. Anderson M., et al. “Learning objectives for medical student education-guidelines for medical schools: report I of the medical school objectives project”. Academic Medicine 1 (1999): 13-18.
  3. Chen M., et al. “Should medical schools incorporate formal training in informatics?” The Journal of Digital Imaging 1 (2011): 1-5.
  4. Altman M. “The clinical data repository: a challenge to medical student education”. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 6 (2007): 697-699.
  5. Krause ND., et al. “Assessing medical informatics confidence among 1st and 2nd year medical students”. In: AMIA Annual Symposium Proceedings, 2006”. American Medical Informatics Association (2006): 989.
  6. Ferenchick GS., et al. “Are students ready for meaningful use?” Medical Education Online 1 (2013): 22495.
  7. Walpole S., et al. “Health informatics in UK Medical Education: an online survey of current practice”. JRSM Open 1 (2016): 2054270416682674.
  8. Valenta AL., et al. “AMIA Board White Paper: AMIA 2017 core competencies for applied health informatics education at the master’s degree level”. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 12 (2018): 1657-1668.
  9. Gadd CS., et al. “Domains, tasks, and knowledge for health informatics practice: results of a practice analysis”. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 6 (2020): 845-852.
  10. Silverman HD., et al. “Domains, tasks, and knowledge for clinical informatics subspecialty practice: results of a practice analysis”. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 7 (2019): 586-593.
  11. Bygholm A. “Staff training on the use of health information systems: what do we know?” In: MIE, (2018): 191-195.
  12. Rajaram A., et al. “Training medical students and residents in the use of electronic health records: a systematic review of the literature”. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 1 (2020): 175-180.
  13. Colleges AoAM. “Contemporary Issues in Medicine: Medical Informatics and Population Health”. The Association (1998).
  14. Casiro O and Regehr G. “Enacting pedagogy in curricula: on the vital role of governance in medical education”. Academic Medicine 2 (2018): 179-184.
  15. Gonzalo JD., et al. “Health systems science curricula in undergraduate medical education: identifying and defining a potential curricular framework”. Academic Medicine 1 (2017): 123-131.

Dani Zoorob., et al. The Current State of Medical Informatics Curricula in Undergraduate Medical Education: A National Survey. EC Gynaecology 12.7 (2023): 31-45.