EC Gynaecology

Obstetrics and gynaecology offers considerable scope for a rewarding professional life, yet conventional measures of success de- scribe only part of a worthwhile career. Operative volume, academic appointments and institutional office reveal little about whether women felt heard, whether colleagues became more capable, or whether services remained safe after a respected clinician departed. This special article examines the idea of a professional bucket list as a starting point for a more considered account of fulfilment and legacy. Drawing on selected literature concerning professionalism, respectful maternity care, shared decision making, patient safety, mentorship, physician wellbeing and retirement, it proposes a career agenda organised around contributions that retain value be- yond the individual encounter. These include maintaining clinical judgement, restoring function and dignity, protecting reproductive autonomy, strengthening teams, improving access, undertaking useful scholarship and preparing successors. The proposed agenda is an ethical and practical argument, not a validated measure of career success. Ambition requires scrutiny when it encourages unnec- essary intervention, professional indispensability or achievement at the expense of health and relationships. Institutions also bear responsibility: personal commitment cannot compensate indefinitely for unsafe workloads, discrimination or inadequate resources. A lasting professional legacy rests on demonstrable benefit to women, knowledge and capability shared with others, and services able to function without dependence on one practitioner. Such a career should remain compatible with a meaningful life beyond medicine.

Keywords: Obstetrics and Gynaecology; Professional Fulfilment; Clinical Leadership; Mentorship; Patient Safety; Career Development; Professional Legacy

1. ABIM Foundation; ACP-ASIM Foundation; European Federation of Internal Medicine. “Medical professionalism in the new millennium: a physician charter”. Annals of Internal Medicine3 (2002): 243-246. 
2. Kirubarajan A., et al. “Interventions to prevent and treat burnout in obstetrics/gynaecology: a scoping review”. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada4 (2021): 490-496. 
3. World Health Organization. “WHO recommendations: intrapartum care for a positive childbirth experience”. World Health Organization (2018). 
4. Bohren MA., et al. “The mistreatment of women during childbirth in health facilities globally: a mixed-methods systematic review”. PLOS Medicine6 (2015): e1001847. 
5. Birkmeyer JD., et al. “Surgical skill and complication rates after bariatric surgery”. The New England Journal of Medicine15 (2013): 1434-1442. 
6. Elwyn G., et al. “Shared decision making: a model for clinical practice”. Journal of General Internal Medicine10 (2012): 1361-1367. 
7. Draycott T., et al. “Does training in obstetric emergencies improve neonatal outcome?”. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology2 (2006): 177-182. 
8. Main EK., et al. “Reduction of severe maternal morbidity from hemorrhage using a state perinatal quality collaborative”. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology3 (2017): 298.e1-298.e11. 
9. Sambunjak D., et al. “Mentoring in academic medicine: a systematic review”. JAMA9 (2006): 1103-1115. 
10. Chalmers I and Glasziou P. “Avoidable waste in the production and reporting of research evidence”. The Lancet9683 (2009): 86-89. 
11. Ogrinc G., et al. “SQUIRE 2.0 (standards for quality improvement reporting excellence): revised publication guidelines from a detailed consensus process”. BMJ Quality & Safety12 (2016): 986-992. 
12. Wu AW. “Medical error: the second victim. the doctor who makes the mistake needs help too”. BMJ7237 (2000): 726-727. 
13. Meara JG., et al. “Global surgery 2030: evidence and solutions for achieving health, welfare, and economic development”. The Lancet9993 (2015): 569-624. 
14. West CP., et al. “Interventions to prevent and reduce physician burnout: a systematic review and meta-analysis”. The Lancet10057 (2016): 2272-2281. 
15. Shanafelt TD and Noseworthy JH. “Executive leadership and physician well-being: nine organizational strategies to promote engagement and reduce burnout”. Mayo Clinic Proceedings1 (2017): 129-146. 
16. Bodenheimer T and Sinsky C. “From triple to quadruple aim: care of the patient requires care of the provider”. Annals of Family Medicine6 (2014): 573-576. 
17. Carlasare LE., et al. “Associations between organizational support, burnout, and professional fulfillment among US physicians during the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic”. Journal of Healthcare Management5 (2024): 368-386. 
18. Silver MP., et al. “A systematic review of physician retirement planning”. Human Resources for Health1 (2016): 67.