EC Gynaecology

Pregnancy in a rudimentary horn represents a rare form of ectopic pregnancy. It’s extremely rare and potentially serious obstetric situation, threatening the maternal-fetal prognosis. It can be diagnosed ultrasonographically or laparoscopically. In the event of rupture, there is significant hemorrhage. Treatment is essentially based on surgery. We report the case of a 29-year-old patient admitted to a gynecological emergency department for a 06-week amenorrhea associated with hemodynamically stable right pelvic pain. Endovaginal ultrasound revealed an ectopic pregnancy on a rudimentary right horn measuring 4 cm. Diagnosed laparoscopy were performed. Due to abdominal pain and the high risk associated with pregnancy in the rudimentary horn, we performed the removal of the cavitated rudimentary horn. The patient’s postoperative course was smooth, and she was discharged from the hospital in good condition

 Keywords: Tubal Pregnancy; Rudimentary Horn; Unicornuate Uterus; Laparoscopy; Case Report

1. “The American Fertility Society. Classifications of anneal adhesions, distal tubal occlusion, tubal occlusion secondary to tubal ligation, tubal pregnancies, Müllerian anomalies and intrauterine adhesions”. Fertility and Sterility 49.6 (1988): 944-955.
2. Faraj R and Steel M. “Management of cornual (interstitial) pregnancy”. The Obstetrician and Gynaecologist 9.4 (2007): 249-255.
3. Simon C., et al. “Mullerian defects in women with normal reproductive outcome”. Fertility and Sterility 56.6 (1991): 1192-1193.
4. O’leary JL and O’leary JA. “Rudimentary horn pregnancy”. Obstetrics and Gynaecology 22 (1963): 371-375.
5. Nahum G. “Uterine anomalies: How common are they, and what is their distribution among subtypes?” Journal of Reproductive Medicine 43.10 (1998): 877-887.
6. Ayoubi JM., et al. “Tubal curettage: a new conservative treatment for Haemorrhagic interstitial pregnancies”. Human Reproduction 16.4 (2001): 780-781.
7. Cobec I., et al. “Pregnancy in a non-communicating rudimentary horn of a unicornuate uterus”. Bangladesh Medical Journal 39.1 (2010): 47-48.
8. Jayasinghe Y., et al. “The presentation and early diagnosis of the rudimentary uterine horn”. Obstetrics and Gynaecology 105.6 (2005): 1456-1467.
9. Soundararagan V and Rai J. “Laparoscopic removal of a rudimentary uterine horn during pregnancy: a case report”. Journal of Reproductive Medicine 45.7 (2000): 599-602.
10. Sanaa I., et al. “Rupture utérine sur utérus bicorne à 12 semaines d’aménorrhée: à propos d’un cas”. Pan African Medical Journal 24 (2016): 153.
11. Singh P., et al. “Midtrimester spontaneous torsion of unruptured gravid rudimentary horn: presurgical diagnosis on magnetic resonance imaging”. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research 41.9 (2015): 1478-1482.
12. Wang B., et al. “Torsion of a rudimentary uterine horn at 22 weeks of gestation”. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research 37.7 (2011): 919-920.
13. Kumar N., et al. “Torsion and rupture of a non-communicating rudimentary horn in a 17-week gestation in a 16-year-old girl: lessons learnt”. BMJ Case Reports (2018): bcr-2017-222073.
14. Siwatch S., et al. “Rudimentary horn pregnancy: a 10-year experience and review of literature”. Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics 287.4 (2013): 687-695.