EC Gynaecology

Review Article Volume 12 Issue 8 - 2023

Integration of Health Informatics in Undergraduate Medical Educational Curricula - A Systematic Review

Dani Zoorob1*, Mark English2, Camille Bratton3, Lauren Leiby3, Catherine VanHook3 and Anita Tamirisa4

1Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Louisiana State University (LSU) Health Sciences Center in Shreveport, Shreveport LA, USA

2Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Toledo, Toledo, OH, USA

3College of Medicine and Life Sciences, University of Toledo, Toledo, OH, USA

4Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Advocate Illinois Masonic, Chicago, IL, USA

*Corresponding Author: Dani Zoorob, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Louisiana State University (LSU) Health Sciences Center in Shreveport, Shreveport LA, USA.
Received: June 07, 2023; Published: July 12, 2023



Objective: To systematically review student utilization of medical informatics and its integration in the undergraduate medical education system.

Introduction: The need for medical informatics integration in curricula has been suggested as essential given the expansion of technology into health care. The structure of such instruction will need to complement current health care practices while enhancing patient outcomes. Attempts at integrating modules and electives have been carried by various institutions. However, no compilation of the efforts or their value has been reported for the purpose of enhancing current curricula.

Methods: Five databases were used (PubMed/OVID, CINAHL, Cochrane Library, Embase, and Web of Science). Inclusion criteria included articles published between 1990 and June 2021. MeSH terms and key words (available in Appendix A) in titles and abstracts included health informatics, clinical informatics, informatics training, medical student, medical school, undergraduate medical education (UME), pre-clerkship education, clinical clerkship, clinical education, clinical apprenticeship, or foundational science course/curricula. The review yielded evidence of 20 peer reviewed and relevant articles.

Results: Four themes were identified: (A) Informatics education in medical schools, (B) Medical student ability to utilize medical informatics/technology, (C) Medical student interactions with electronic health records, (D) Adoption of informatics in medical students' assessment. However, no description of a formalized curriculum, whether longitudinal or otherwise, was noted.

Conclusion: Efforts to integrate informatics in medical school curricula have been limited and unaligned. A prospective focus may require ensuring the integration of formal objectives that are devised by a national licensing body.

Keywords: Curriculum; Informatics; Medical Education; Medical Records; Medical Students; Systematic Review

  1. Collen MF. “Origins of medical informatics”. Western Journal of Medicine6 (1986): 778.
  2. Espino JU and Levine MG. “An overview of the medical informatics curriculum in medical schools”. Proceedings of the AMIA Symposium; American Medical Informatics Association (1998): 467.
  3. AAMC P. “Report II: Contemporary Issues in Medicine: Medical Informatics and Population Health”. Washington, DC: Association of American Medical Colleges (1998): 25.
  4. Chen M., et al. “Should medical schools incorporate formal training in informatics?” The Journal of Digital Imaging 24 (2011): 1-5.
  5. Moher D., et al. “Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement”. Annals of Internal Medicine4 (2009): 264-269.
  6. Silverman H., et al. “The evolution of a novel biomedical informatics curriculum for medical students”. Academic Medicine1 (2012): 84-90.
  7. Badgett RG., et al. “Teaching clinical informatics to third-year medical students: negative results from two controlled trials”. BMC Medical Education 1 (2001): 1-7.
  8. Gjerde CL., et al. “Teaching of medical informatics in UME-21 medical schools: best practices and useful resources”. Family Medicine-Kansas City1 (2004): S68-S73.
  9. Krause ND., et al. “Assessing medical informatics confidence among 1st and 2nd year medical students”. AMIA Annual Symposium Proceedings; 2006: American Medical Informatics Association (2006): 989.
  10. McGowan JJ., et al. “Educating medical students as competent users of health information technologies: the MSOP data”. Medinfo 12 (2007): 1414-1418.
  11. Carlson J., et al. “The impact of a diagnostic reminder system on student clinical reasoning during simulated case studies”. Simulation in Healthcare1 (2011): 11-17.
  12. Briscoe GW., et al. “Students’ and residents’ perceptions regarding technology in medical training”. Academic Psychiatry 30 (2006): 470-479.
  13. Hilty DM., et al. “APA Summit on Medical Student Education Task Force on Informatics and Technology: learning about computers and applying computer technology to education and practice”. Academic Psychiatry 30 (2006): 29-35.
  14. Anderson CR., et al. “Practical Evidence-Based Medicine at the Student-to-Physician Transition: Effectiveness of an Undergraduate Medical Education Capstone Course”. Medical Science Educator 30 (2020): 885-890.
  15. Jacobs RJ., et al. “Predictors of osteopathic medical students’ readiness to use health information technology”. Journal of Osteopathic Medicine12 (2017): 773-781.
  16. Kalet AL., et al. “Just enough, but not too much interactivity leads to better clinical skills performance after a computer assisted learning module”. Medical Teacher10 (2012): 833-839.
  17. Romanov K and Nevgi A. “Do medical students watch video clips in eLearning and do these facilitate learning?” Medical Teacher5 (2007): 490-494.
  18. Rawlins F., et al. “Quantifying medical student clinical experiences via an ICD Code Logging App”. International Journal of Medical Informatics 111 (2018): 51-57.
  19. Davis L., et al. “Attitudes of first-year medical students toward the confidentiality of computerized patient records”. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association1 (1999): 53-60.
  20. Wald HS., et al. “Electronic health record training in undergraduate medical education: bridging theory to practice with curricula for empowering patient-and relationship-centered care in the computerized setting”. Academic Medicine3 (2014): 380-386.
  21. Chi J., et al. “How are medical students using the Electronic Health Record (EHR)?: An analysis of EHR use on an inpatient medicine rotation”. PloS One8 (2019): e0221300.
  22. Ellaway RH., et al. “Medical education in an electronic health record-mediated world”. Medical Teacher4 (2013): 282-286.
  23. Stevens LA., et al. “Improved medical student engagement with EHR documentation following the 2018 centers for medicare and medicaid billing changes”. Applied Clinical Informatics03 (2021): 582-588.
  24. Monahan K., et al. “Copy-and-paste in medical student notes: extent, temporal trends, and relationship to scholastic performance”. Applied Clinical Informatics03 (2019): 479-486.
  25. Knight AM., et al. “The effect of computerized provider order entry on medical student clerkship experiences”. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association5 (2005): 554-560.
  26. Pereira AG., et al. “Collaborating for competency-a model for single electronic health record onboarding for medical students rotating among separate health systems”. Applied Clinical Informatics01 (2018): 199-204.
  27. Jones R. “Health informatics in the undergraduate curriculum”. BMJ: British Medical Journal6802 (1991): 584.

Dani Zoorob., et al. Integration of Health Informatics in Undergraduate Medical Educational Curricula - A Systematic Review. EC Gynaecology 12.8 (2023): 01-13.