EC Gynaecology

Introduction and Objectives: Cesarean section (CS) is one of the most commonly performed surgical procedures globally and has become increasingly prevalent in recent decades. The objective of our study is to evaluate incidence of cesarean sections and the risk of possible surgical complications after cesarean section (CS).

Materials and Methods: During the study period, January 2022 until April 2024 in University Hospital Maternity “Queen Geraldine”, 5478 patients underwent cesarean section (CS) surgeries. Data were statistically analyzed.

Results: Latest available data (2010 - 2018) from 154 countries covering 94.5% of world live births show that 21% of women gave birth by caesarean worldwide. Incidence rate of cesarean section (CS) during our study period is 41.5%. Incidence rate of postpartum hemorrhage, endometritis and surgical site infections after cesarean section (CS) during our study period is respectively 1.3%, 1,9%, 0.76%.

Conclusion: Cesarean section (CS) rates continue to increase worldwide. There is growing international concern over the health consequences as CS contributes to increased maternal and prenatal mortality and morbidity. Optimizing the use of CS is a global concern and challenge in public health.

 Keywords: Cesarean Section (CS); Postpartum Hemorrhage (PPH); Endometritis (EMM); Surgical Site Infections (SSI)

1. Ana Pilar Betran., et al. “Trends and projections of caesarean section rates: global and regional estimates”. BMJ Global Health 6 (2021): e005671.
2. Boatin AA., et al. “Within country inequalities in caesarean section rates: observational study of 72 low and middle income countries”. British Medical Journal 360 (2018): k55.
3. The DHS Program - Demographic and Health Surveys (2020).
4. United Nation as Statistics Division. Geographic regions (2021).
5. Betran AP., et al. “What is the optimal rate of caesarean section at population level? A systematic review of ecologic studies”. Reproductive Health 12 (2015): 57.
6. Betrán AP., et al. “The increasing trend in caesarean section rates: global, regional and national estimates: 1990-2014”. PLoS One2 (2016): e0148343.
7. Cunningham K. Williams Obstetrics. In Williams, Cesarean delivery and peripartum hysterectomy. USA 591 (2018).
8. Keag OE., et al. “Long-Term risks and benefits associated with cesarean delivery for mother, baby, and subsequent pregnancies: systematic review and meta-analysis”. PLoS Medicine1 (2018): e1002494.
9. Sandall J., et al. “Short-Term and long-term effects of caesarean section on the health of women and children”. Lancet 10155 (2018): 1349-1357.
10. Opiyo N., et al. “Non-clinical interventions to reduce unnecessary caesarean sections: WHO recommendations”. Bulletin of the World Health Organization 1 (2020): 66-68.
11. Bergholt T., et al. “Intraoperative surgical complication during cesarean section: an observational study of the incidence and risk factors”. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica 3 (2003): 251-256.
12. Betrán AP., et al. “Interventions to reduce unnecessary caesarean sections in healthy women and babies”. Lancet10155 (2018): 1358-1368.
13. Betrán AP., et al. “Who statement on caesarean section rates”. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology5 (2016): 667-670.
14. Liu S., et al. “Risk of maternal postpartum readmission associated with mode of delivery”. Obstetrics and Gynecology 4 (2005): 836-842.
15. Maswime S and Buchmann E. “A systematic review of maternal near miss and mortality due to postpartum hemorrhage”. International Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics 1 (2017): 1-7.
16. Ahmadzia HK., et al. “Obstetric surgical site infections: 2 grams compared with 3 grams of cefazolin in morbidly obese women”. Obstetrics and Gynecology 4 (2015): 708-715.
17. Hodgetts-Morton V., et al. “Vaginal preparation with chlorhexidine at cesarean section to reduce endometritis and prevent sepsis: A randomized pilot trial (PREPS)”. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica 2 (2020): 231-239.