1CHUV Lausanne - Département D'hôpital Maternité/Gynécologie et Obstétrique, Avenue Pierre Decker 2, 1011 Lausanne, Switzerland
2Associate Professor SSD: MEDS-21/A - Ginecologia e Ostetricia, Dipartimento di Scienze Biomediche, Sperimentali e Cliniche ‘Mario Serio’ Room 103, Pavillon 9, AOU Careggi, Italy
3Full Professor of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Università della Calabria (UNICAL) and Obstetrics and Gynecology Unit, Annunziata Hospital, Via Migliori 1, Cosenza, Italy
4Direttore Programma Dipartimentale Ginecologia dell'Infertilita' presso Ausl Bologna, Italy
5Antonio Palagiano CFA Naples, Italy
6Associate Professor Adjunct, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Science, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA and Past President of the Italian Society of Fertility, Sterility, and Reproductive Medicine (SIFE-MR), Italy
Background: Endometriosis is a chronic inflammatory condition affecting reproductive-aged women, often associated with infertility. Medical and surgical treatments are widely used, but their relative effectiveness in restoring fertility remains debated.
Objective: To compare the impact of medical and surgical interventions on spontaneous pregnancy and IVF outcomes in women with endometriosis-associated infertility.
Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted according to PRISMA 2020 guidelines. Databases searched included PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Cochrane Library from January 2000 to June 2025. Eligible studies were comparative (prospective, retrospective, RCTs, meta-analyses) and evaluated fertility outcomes following medical or surgical treatment. Outcomes assessed were spontaneous pregnancy, IVF success, and surgical complications. Risk of bias was assessed with ROBINS-I and certainty of evidence with GRADE.
Results: Thirty-eight comparative studies met inclusion criteria: 12 evaluated medical treatments versus controls, 15 assessed surgical interventions versus controls, and 11 directly compared medical versus surgical approaches. Surgical treatment was associated with significantly higher odds of spontaneous pregnancy compared to controls (OR 1.71, 95% CI 1.41-2.08). Medical therapy had limited effect on natural conception, though in some studies GnRH agonist pretreatment before IVF modestly improved implantation rates. When directly compared, surgical interventions had superior outcomes in spontaneous pregnancy, whereas IVF results were similar between arms. Risk of bias was moderate in most studies. GRADE certainty ranged from low to moderate.
Conclusion: Surgical treatment offers significant benefits for spontaneous conception in women with early to moderate endometriosis. The role of medical therapy is more supportive, particularly in IVF protocols. Fertility treatment decisions should be individualized based on disease stage, ovarian reserve, and patient goals.
Keywords: Endometriosis; Infertility; Spontaneous Pregnancy; IVF; Medical Therapy; Laparoscopy; GnRH; Comparative Studies
Carlo Bulletti., et al. “Endometriosis and Infertility: Medical Versus Surgical Approaches - A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis”. EC Gynaecology 14.8 (2025): 01-14.
© 2025 Carlo Bulletti., et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Open Access by ECronicon is
licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution
4.0 International License
Based on a work at www.ecronicon.net