EC Gynaecology

Opinion Volume 8 Issue 6 - 2019

Double Intrauterine Insemination for Pregnancy: A Case of Overuse

Morteza Arab-Zozani*

PhD of Health Policy, Iranian Center of Excellence in Health Management, School of Management and Medical Informatics, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran

*Corresponding Author: Morteza Arab-Zozani, PhD of Health Policy, Iranian Center of Excellence in Health Management, School of Management and Medical Informatics, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.
Received: May 9, 2019; Published: May 27, 2019




Lack of resources is one of the most common problems of all health systems around the world. All countries are seeking to achieve sus- tainable resources for their health systems in order to achieve their main goals (health status, responsiveness and financial protection).

  1. Arab-Zozani M., et al. “Medical overuse in the Iranian healthcare system: a systematic review protocol”. BMJ Open4 (2018): e020355.
  2. Hasanpoor E., et al. “Using the evidence-based medicine and evidence-based management to minimise overuse and maximise quality in healthcare: a hybrid perspective”. BMJ Evidence-Based Medicine (2018): bmjebm-2018-110957.
  3. Arab-Zozani M., et al. “Balancing Overuse and Underuse in the Iranian Healthcare System: A Force Field Theory Analysis”. Ethiopian Journal of Health Sciences2 (2019): 231-238.
  4. Brownlee S., et al. “Evidence for overuse of medical services around the world”. The Lancet10090 (2017): 156-168.
  5. Nuojua-Huttunen S., et al. “Intrauterine insemination treatment in subfertility: an analysis of factors affecting outcome”. Human Reproduction3 (1999): 698-703.
  6. Cantineau AE., et al. “Single versus double intrauterine insemination (IUI) in stimulated cycles for subfertile couples”. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 1 (2003): CD003854.
  7. Cantineau AEP., et al. “Single versus double intrauterine insemination in stimulated cycles for subfertile couples: a systematic review based on a Cochrane review”. Human Reproduction5 (2003): 941-946.
  8. Osuna C., et al. “One versus two inseminations per cycle in intrauterine insemination with sperm from patients’ husbands: a systematic review of the literature”. Fertility and Sterility1 (2004): 17-24.
  9. Zavos A., et al. “Double versus single homologous intrauterine insemination for male factor infertility: a systematic review and metaanalysis”. Asian Journal of Andrology4 (2013): 533-538.
  10. Arab-Zozani M and CO Nastri. “Single versus double intrauterine insemination (IUI) for pregnancy: A systematic review and metaanalysis”. European Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Reproductive Biology 215 (2017): 75-84.
  11. Nastri C., et al. “P26. 04: To appraise the current evidence comparing double and single intrauterine insemination (IUI) on the reproductive outcomes in subfertile couples”. Ultrasound in Obstetrics and GynecologyS1 (2017): 239-240.

Morteza Arab-Zozani. "Double Intrauterine Insemination for Pregnancy: A Case of Overuse". EC Gynaecology 8.6 (2019): 498- 499.

ECronicon Journal

Our Services

Quick Links

Information

Creative Commons LicenseOpen Access by ECronicon is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
Based on a work at www.ecronicon.net