EC Gynaecology

Research Article Volume 13 Issue 6 - 2024

Determinants of Macrosomia in Nigest Ellen Mohammed Memorial Comprehensive Specialized Hospital, Wachemo University, Ethiopia. Unmatched Case-Control Study

Lonsako Abute Woiloro1*, Temesgen Tamirat Fonkamo1, Rediet Dessalegne Dayemo2, Bizuayehu Belete Erdedo3 and Mathewos Tesfaye Yanore4

1School of Public Health, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Wachemo University, Hossana, Ethiopia

2School of Medicine, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Wachemo University, Hossana, Ethiopia

3Wachemo Comprehensive Secondary School, Hossana, Ethiopia

4School of Medical Science, Haramaya University, Harar, Ethiopia

*Corresponding Author: Lonsako Abute Woiloro, School of Public Health, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Wachemo University, Hossana, Ethiopia.
Received: April 24, 2024; Published: May 14, 2024



Background: Fetal macrosomia describes excessive intrauterine growth which leads to an increased birth weight. The limit which is set at a birth weight of ≥ 4000g regardless of gestational age is mostly used. There are many factors that affect fetal macrosomia. The aim of this study was to identify determinant factors of fetal macrosomia among neonates born in Nigest Ellen Mohammed Memorial Comprehensive specialized hospital, Wachemo university in 2020, South Ethiopia.

Methods: Unmatched case control study was employed from November 15 to December 15 2020. The required sample size was calculated using the EPI INFO tool. Total sample size was 284, with 71 cases and 213 controls. The data was collected from cases and controls by using the consecutive sampling technique until the desired sample size was reached. The data was entered, cleaned and analyzed using SPSS version 23.0 statistical software for windows analysis.

Result: A total of 279 participants (71 cases and 213 controls) were participated in the study. Mean age was 27.3 years, 80.3% of the mothers were married and 21.5% mothers were housewives. 80.6% mothers gave birth via spontaneous vaginal delivery 29.4% of women claimed they experienced a complication during their pregnancy and 42.3% of the newborns were males. The level of macrosomia was 24.7%. In multivariate logistic regression complications during pregnancy [7.24 (95% CI: 2.74 - 19.11)], parity (primipara [0.3 [95% CI: 0.11 - 0.84], multipara 0.1 [95% CI: 0.037 - 0.294]), and newborn sex (male) [2.23 (95% CI: 1.15 - 4.31)] were significantly and independently associated with macrosomic birth.

Conclusion: The prevalence of fetal macrosomia was 24.7%. This is relatively higher figure from other study area findings. Factors that affect macrosomic birth were complications during pregnancy, parity (primipara and multipara), and newborn sex (male). Obstetric care providers should assess those pregnant women with complications and pregnant women with male sex newborn for history of fetal macrosomia which would help them to be prepared for the managements of maternal and perinatal complications. Health professionals should have to give proper health education on the identified determinant factors for the community.

 Keywords: Fetal Macrosomia; Birth Weight; Pregnancy

  1. Bjørstad AR., et al. “Macrosomia: mode of delivery and pregnancy outcome”. Acta Obstetricia Et Gynecologica Scandinavica5 (2010): 664-669.
  2. Voldner N., et al. “Increased risk of macrosomia among overweight women with high gestational rise in fasting glucose”. Journal of Maternal-Fetal and Neonatal Medicine 1 (2010): 74-81.
  3. Ouzounian J., et al. “Pre-pregnancy weight and excess weight gain are risk factors for macrosomia in women with gestational diabetes”. Journal of Perinatology 11 (2011): 717-721.
  4. Koyanagi A., et al. “Macrosomia in 23 developing countries: an analysis of a multicountry, facility-based, cross-sectional survey”. Lancet9865 (2013): 476-483.
  5. Martorell R., et al. “Obesity in women from developing countries”. European Journal of Clinical Nutrition 3 (2000): 247-252.
  6. Young BC and Ecker JL. “Fetal macrosomia and shoulder dystocia in women with gestational diabetes: risks amenable to treatment?” Current Diabetes Reports 1 (2013): 12-18.
  7. Fuchs F., et al. “Association of existing diabetes, gestational diabetes and glycosuria in pregnancy with macrosomia and offspring body mass index, waist and fat mass in later childhood: findings from a prospective pregnancy cohort”. Diabetologia 1 (2010): 89-97.
  8. Stotland N., et al. “Risk factors and obstetric complications associated with macrosomia”. International Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics 3 (2004): 220-226.
  9. Yadav H and Lee N. “Factors influencing macrosomia in pregnant women in a tertiary care hospital in Malaysia”. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research 2 (2014): 439-444.
  10. Cheng YW., et al. “Evaluating the impact of risk factors on birth weight and gestational age: a multilevel joint modeling approach”. International Journal of Fertility and Sterility 2 (2018): 106-113.
  11. Kayode-Adedeji B., et al. “Prevalence of fetal macrosomia and neonatal complications in a Nigerian suburban hospital: a five year study”. Journal of Pediatric and Neonatal Individualized Medicine 1 (2018): 70120.
  12. Mengesha HG and Sahle BW. “Cause of neonatal deaths in northern Ethiopia: a prospective cohort study”. BMC Public Health 1 (2017): 62.
  13. Malik M., et al. “The association of maternal risk factors to macrosomia in rural areas of Haryana, India: a community based study”. International Journal of Community Medicine and Public Health 9 (2018): 3842-3846.

Lonsako Abute Woiloro., et al. "Determinants of Macrosomia in Nigest Ellen Mohammed Memorial Comprehensive Specialized Hospital, Wachemo University, Ethiopia. Unmatched Case-Control Study". EC Gynaecology 13.6 (2024): 01-09.