EC Dental Science

Review Article Volume 24 Issue 7 - 2025

Unlocking Oral Function: Understanding and Managing the Shortened Dental Arch

Peter S*, Prasad Aravind, Abhinav Mohan and Harishini S

Department of Prosthodontics, Crown and Bridge, Pondicherry University, India

*Corresponding Author: Peter S, Department of Prosthodontics, Crown and Bridge, Pondicherry University, India.
Received: June 23, 2025; Published: July 02, 2025



The shortened dental arch (SDA) is a dentition of no more than twenty teeth with an intact anterior region but a reduced number of occluding pairs of posterior teeth. The SDA concept is a valid treatment option in cases in which anteriors and premolars can provide adequate aesthetics, function, and occlusal stability. In 1992, the World Health Organization stated that a functional and aesthetic dentition requires no less than 20 well distributed teeth. This treatment option for the partially dentate patient may provide oral functionality, improved oral hygiene, comfort, and possible, reduced costs.

 Keywords: Shortened Dental Arch; Oral Functionality; Unlocking Oral Functions; Aesthetics

  1. Mukatash GN., et al. “Needs and demands of prosthetic treatment among two groups of individuals”. Indian Journal of Dental Research4 (2010): 564-567.
  2. Davenport JC., et al. “Need and demand for treatment”. British Dental Journal7 (2000): 364-368.
  3. Käyser AF. “Shortened dental arches and oral function”. Journal of Oral Rehabilitation5 (1981): 457-462.
  4. Witter DJ., et al. “The shortened dental arch concept and its implications for oral health care”. Community Dentistry and Oral Epidemiology4 (1999): 249-258.
  5. De Sa E Frias V., et al. “Shortened dental arch: a review of current treatment concepts”. Journal of Prosthodontics2 (2004): 104-110.
  6. Armellini D and Von Fraunhofer JA. “The shortened dental arch: a review of the literature”. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry6 (2004): 531-535.
  7. Montero J., et al. “Effect of arch length on the functional well‐being of dentate adults”. Journal of Oral Rehabilitation5 (2009): 338-345.
  8. Witter DJ., et al. “Signs and symptoms of mandibular dysfunction in shortened dental arches*”. Journal of Oral Rehabilitation5 (1988): 413-420.
  9. Tallents RH., et al. “Prevalence of missing posterior teeth and intraarticular temporomandibular disorders”. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry1 (2002): 45-50.
  10. Hattori Y., et al. “Occlusal and TMJ loads in subjects with experimentally shortened dental arches”. Journal of Dental Research7 (2003): 532-536.
  11. Ishimaru JI., et al. “The effect of occlusal loss on normal and pathological temporomandibular joints: an animal study”. Journal of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery2 (1994): 95-102.
  12. Witter DJ., et al. “Occlusal stability in shortened dental arches”. Journal of Dental Research2 (2001): 432-436.
  13. Sarita PT., et al. “A study on occlusal stability in shortened dental arches”. International Journal of Prosthodontics4 (2003): 375-380.
  14. Elias AC and Sheiham A. “The relationship between satisfaction with mouth and number, position and condition of teeth: studies in Brazilian adults”. Journal of Oral Rehabilitation 1 (1999): 53-71.
  15. Leake JL., et al. “Social and functional impact of reduced posterior dental units in older adults”. Journal of Oral Rehabilitation1 (1994): 1-10.
  16. Hill J. “Report on the shortened dental arch concept”. University of Glasglow (2007): 1-17.
  17. Ikebe K., et al. “Association of masticatory performance with age, gender, number of teeth, occlusal force and salivary flow in Japanese older adults: is ageing a risk factor for masticatory dysfunction?” Archives of Oral Biology10 (2011): 991-996.
  18. Jepson NJ and Allen PF. “Short and sticky options in the treatment of the partially dentate patient”. British Dental Journal12 (1999): 646-652.
  19. Allen PF., et al. “The role of the shortened dental arch concept in the management of reduced dentitions”. British Dental Journal9 (1995): 355-357.
  20. Ben-Ur Z., et al. “Factors affecting displacement of free-end saddle removable partial dentures”. Quintessence International 1 (1991): 23-27.
  21. Neill DJ. “The problem of the lower free-end removable partial denture”. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry4 (1958): 623-634.
  22. JN A. “A clinical survey of partial dentures”. British Dental Journal 92 (1952): 59-67.
  23. Anderson JN. “The cobalt chromium partial denture. A clinical survey”. British Dental Journal 107 (1959): 57-62.
  24. Walter MH., et al. “The randomized shortened dental arch study: tooth loss”. Journal of Dental Research8 (2010): 818-822.

Peter S., et al. “Unlocking Oral Function: Understanding and Managing the Shortened Dental Arch”. EC Dental Science  24.7 (2025): 01-06.

ECronicon Journal

Our Services

Quick Links

Information

Creative Commons LicenseOpen Access by ECronicon is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
Based on a work at www.ecronicon.net