Editorial Volume 25 Issue 2 - 2026

Smile Insights: How Well Do Dentists Know Anterior Aesthetics?

Ramesh T R1, Mamta Agarwal2, Ranjana Yadav3*, Abhishek Biswas4, Kumar Kartikey5and Pallavi Singh6

1Principal, Professor and HOD, Department of Prosthodontics Crown and Bridges, Purvanchal Institute of Dental Sciences (PIDS), Gorakhpur, U.P., India
2HOD and Professor, Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Purvanchal Institute of Dental Sciences (PIDS), Gorakhpur, U.P., India
3Senior Lecturer, Department of Public Health Dentistry, Purvanchal Institute of Dental Sciences (PIDS), Gorakhpur, U.P., India
4Senior Lecturer, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Purvanchal Institute of Dental Sciences (PIDS), Gorakhpur, U.P., India
5Assistant Professor, Department of Periodontics, Purvanchal Institute of Dental Sciences (PIDS), Gorakhpur, U.P., India
6Senior Lecturer, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology, Purvanchal Institute of Dental Sciences (PIDS), Gorakhpur, U.P., India

*Corresponding Author: Ranjana Yadav, Senior Lecturer, Department of Public Health Dentistry, Purvanchal Institute of Dental Sciences (PIDS), Gorakhpur, U.P., India.
Received: January 07, 2026; Published: January 31, 2026



Aim of the Study: This study aimed to evaluate the influence of the undergraduate dental curriculum on dental graduates’ knowledge of anterior dental esthetics and the impact of clinical experience on this knowledge. A cross-sectional survey was conducted among BDS interns, general dentists, and specialists in Gorakhpur district. The results showed that less than half (49.6%) of the dentists had satisfactory knowledge of gingival esthetics, while 91.9% had satisfactory knowledge of anterior dental esthetics. Dentists with more than 10 years of clinical experience had better knowledge of gingival esthetics.

Introduction: The increasing awareness of the general population about their appearance demands more esthetic results from dentists. Esthetics is a crucial aspect of dentistry, influencing all major dental specialties. This study aimed to assess the knowledge of anterior dental esthetics among dental graduates and the impact of clinical experience on this knowledge.

Methodology: A cross-sectional survey was conducted among BDS interns, general dentists, and specialists in Gorakhpur district. A questionnaire with 30 questions was used to assess knowledge of gingival and dental esthetics. The data was analyzed using SPSS version 20.0, and the chi-square test was applied to identify associations between variables.

Results: The study found that: • 49.6% of dentists had satisfactory knowledge of gingival esthetics, while 91.9% had satisfactory knowledge of anterior dental esthetics. • Dentists from prosthodontic, restorative, and periodontic specialties showed better knowledge of gingival esthetics (76.1%) compared to other groups. • Practitioners with more than 10 years of clinical experience had better knowledge of gingival esthetics.

Discussion: The study highlights the need for improvement in the undergraduate dental curriculum and continuing dental education to enhance clinical skills and professional excellence. Experience and knowledge aid in deeper interpretation of problems and better judgement skills.

Conclusion: The undergraduate curriculum should be designed and taught with consideration of the needs and demands of society. Experience and knowledge are essential for better clinical reasoning and esthetic outcomes.

Clinical Implications: The survey was conducted amongst general dentists and specialists in PIDS Gorakhpur, categorized according to qualifications and experience, to emphasize the importance of improvement in undergraduate dental curriculum and encourage continuing dental education in all fields of dentistry. The topic of esthetics was selected as it correlates to all major fields of dentistry.

Keywords:Esthetics; Dental; Continuing Dental Education; Over Bite; Knowledge; Gingiva

  1. VV Gordan., et al. “Esthetic dentistry in North American Dental schools”. Journal of the Canadian Dental Association 4 (2004): 230.
  2. I Ahmad. “Anterior dental aesthetics: Facial perspective”. British Dental Journal1 (2005): 15-21.
  3. I Ahmad. “Anterior dental aesthetics: Gingival perspective”. British Dental Journal4 (2005): 195-202.
  4. I Ahmad. “Anterior dental aesthetics: Dental perspective”. British Dental Journal3 (2005): 135-141.
  5. Tarnow D., et al. “The effect of the distance from the contact point to the crest of bone in the presence or absence of the interproximal dental papilla”. Journal of Periodontology 12 (1992): 995-996.
  6. España P., et al. “Smile esthetics from odontology students' perspectives”. The Angle Orthodontist 2 (2014): 214-224.
  7. Jornung J and Fardal O. “Perceptions of patients’ smiles: A comparison of patients’ and dentists’ opinions”. Journal of the American Dental Association 12 (2007): 1544-1553.
  8. Okoh M and Enabulele J. “Influence of clinical experience on oral health attitude and behaviour of dental students attending a Nigerian university”. Odonto-Stomatologie Tropicale 148 (2014): 25-31.
  9. Falkensammer F., et al. “The impact of education on the perception of facial profile esthetics and treatment needs”. Journal of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery 38 (2014): 620-631.
  10. Khatami S., et al. “Clinical reasoning in dentistry: a conceptual framework for dental education”. Journal of Dental Education9 (2011): 1116-1128.
  11. Ericsson KA. “Deliberate practice and the acquisition and maintenance of expert performance in medicine and related domains”. Academic Medicine 10 (2004): 70-81.

Ranjana Yadav., et al. “Smile Insights: How Well Do Dentists Know Anterior Aesthetics?”. EC Dental Science 25.2 (2026): 01-05.