EC Dental Science

Editorial Volume 25 Issue 1 - 2026

Shades of Grey in Prosthodontics: The Ongoing Clinical Dilemmas (Editorial)

Arpit Sikri1* and Jyotsana Sikri2

1Associate Professor and Post Graduate Teacher, Department of Prosthodontics, Crown and Bridge and Oral Implantology, Bhojia Dental College and Hospital, Budh (Baddi), Teh. Baddi, Distt. Solan, Himachal Pradesh, India

2Associate Professor and Post Graduate Teacher, Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Bhojia Dental College and Hospital, Budh (Baddi), Teh. Baddi, Distt. Solan, Himachal Pradesh, India

*Corresponding Author: Arpit Sikri, Associate Professor and Post Graduate Teacher, Department of Prosthodontics, Crown and Bridge and Oral Implantology, Bhojia Dental College and Hospital, Budh (Baddi), Teh. Baddi, Distt. Solan, Himachal Pradesh, India.
Received: December 16, 2024; Published: December 10, 2025



The field of prosthodontics stands at the intersection of science, art, and clinical judgment. Over the decades, advances in materials, technology, and digital workflows have revolutionized the way prostheses are designed and delivered. Yet, despite these developments, numerous controversies continue to persist-challenging the clinician’s decision-making and sparking academic debate. These controversies are not merely academic curiosities; they influence clinical outcomes, patient satisfaction, and the long-term success of prosthodontic rehabilitation.

  1. Boucher CO. “Concepts of occlusion in prosthodontics”. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry5 (1953): 618-621.
  2. McCord JF and Tyson KW. “A conservative prosthodontic approach to the management of edentulous patients with atrophic (flat) mandibular ridges”. British Dental Journal 12 (1997): 469-473.
  3. Papaspyridakos P., et al. “Accuracy of implant impressions for partially and completely edentulous patients: A systematic review”. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery 4 (2014): 836-845.
  4. Mangano F and Veronesi G. “Digital versus conventional implant impressions: A systematic review”. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 6 (2018): 101-108.
  5. Mutluay MM and Ruyter IE. “Evaluation of adhesion of chairside hard relining materials to denture base polymers”. Dental Materials 11 (2007): 1373-1381.
  6. Heartwell CM and Rahn AO. “Syllabus of complete dentures”. 4th Philadelphia: Lea and Febiger (1986).
  7. Taylor TD and Agar JR. “Twenty years of progress in implant prosthodontics”. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 1 (2002): 89-95.
  8. Goodacre CJ., et al. “CAD/CAM fabricated complete dentures: Concepts and clinical methods of obtaining required morphological data”. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 1 (2012): 34-46.
  9. Revilla-León M and Özcan M. “Artificial intelligence in prosthodontics: What is it and how will it affect our practice?” Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 4 (2020): 576-584.
  10. Carlsson GE. “Critical review of some dogmas in prosthodontics”. Journal of Prosthodontic Research 1 (2009): 3-10.

Arpit Sikri and Jyotsana Sikri. “Shades of Grey in Prosthodontics: The Ongoing Clinical Dilemmas (Editorial)”. EC Dental Science  25.1 (2026): 01-02.

ECronicon Journal

Our Services

Quick Links

Information

Creative Commons LicenseOpen Access by ECronicon is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
Based on a work at www.ecronicon.net