EC Dental Science

Review Article Volume 19 Issue 2 - 2024

Restoration of Endodontically Treated Teeth

Thuraya Abdul Rahim Basudan1*, Fatemh Mousa Alhashem2, Atheer Nasser Bushyah3, Jenan Abbas AlAnsari4, Ebtisam Salman Al Saeed5, Renad Khalid Alamoudi6, Reem Mohammed Alharbi6, Shorouq Mohammed Althomali6, Ali Ayidh Alqahtani7, Ammar Ibrahim Al Ahmed8, Ghufran Saleh Alhumaidi9 and Nada Mohammed Fallatah10

1Department of Restorative Dentistry, East Jeddah General Hospital, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
2Hail Dental Center, Ministry of Health, Hail, Saudi Arabia
3College of Dentistry, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
4Department of Dentistry, Royal Commission Hospital, Jubail, Saudi Arabia
5Primary Health Care, Ministry of Health, Alqatif, Saudi Arabia
6College of Dentistry, Ibn Sina National College, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
7College of Dentistry, King Khalid University, Abha, Saudi Arabia
8College of Dentistry, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, Dammam, Saudi Arabia
9College of Dentistry, Taibah University, Medina, Saudi Arabia
10College of Dentistry, Alfarabi Colleges, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia

*Corresponding Author: Thuraya Abdul Rahim Basudan, Department of Restorative Dentistry, East Jeddah General Hospital, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
Received: December 30, 2019; Published: January 11, 2020



Restoration of endodontically treated teeth is important for maintaining normal tooth function, prevention of fracture of residual tooth and prevention of dental caries. Fort that, an extensive literature search of the Medline, Cochrane, and EMBASE databases us- ing the medical subject headings (MeSH) terms; has been conducted. Papers discussing restoration of endodontically treated teeth were screened for relevant information. There were no limits on date, language, age of participants or publication type. The seek for the restoration of endodontically treated teeth has remarkably increased with the subsequent increase of survival rates up to 80% after 10 years of follow up. Controlling the causes of restoration failure constitutes the major issue in decreasing failure rates among different age groups. Metal ceramic crowns are the most common restorative type in both anterior and posterior teeth. Selecting the proper time for restoration is important and should be based upon the clinical status of each patient.

Keywords: Restoration; Endodontics; Treatment

  1. Julien KC., et al. “Normal Masticatory Performance in Young Adults and Children”. Archives of Oral Biology1 (1996): 69-75.
  2. Esposito M., et al. “Interventions for Replacing Missing Teeth: Antibiotics at Dental Implant Placement to Prevent Complications”. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 7 (2013): CD004152.
  3. Hudis Stephen I and Gary R Goldstein. “Restoration of Endodontically Treated Teeth: A Review of the Literature”. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry1 (1986): 33-38.
  4. Robbins James W. “Guidelines for the Restoration of Endodontically Treated Teeth”. The Journal of the American Dental Association5 (1990): 562.
  5. Glazer Bruce. “Restoration of Endodontically Treated Teeth with Carbon Fibre Posts-a Prospective Study”. Journal of Canadian Dental Association11 (2000): 613-618.
  6. Touré Babacar., et al. “Analysis of Reasons for Extraction of Endodontically Treated Teeth: A Prospective Study”. Journal of Endodontics11 (2011): 1512-1515.
  7. Al-Shammari Khalaf F., et al. “Reasons for Tooth Extraction in Kuwait”. Medical Principles and Practice6 (2006): 417-422.
  8. “Dental Amalgam: Update on Safety Concerns”. The Journal of the American Dental Association4 (1998): 494-503
  9. Mannocci F and J Cowie. “Restoration of Endodontically Treated Teeth”. British Dental Journal6 (2014): 341.
  10. Wall JG and DL Cipra. “Alternative Crown Systems. Is the Metal-Ceramic Crown Always the Restoration of Choice?” Dental Clinics of North America3 (1992): 765-782.
  11. Sailer Irena., et al. “Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial of Zirconia-Ceramic and Metal-Ceramic Posterior Fixed Dental Prostheses: A 3-Year Follow-Up”. International Journal of Prosthodontics6 (2009): 553.
  12. Norman RD., et al. “A 5-Year Study Comparing a Posterior Composite Resin and an Amalgam”. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry5 (1990): 523-529.
  13. Rasines Alcaraz MG., et al. “Direct Composite Resin Fillings Versus Amalgam Fillings for Permanent or Adult Posterior Teeth”. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 3 (2014): CD005620.
  14. Safavi Kamran E., et al. “Influence of Delayed Coronal Permanent Restoration on Endodontic Prognosis”. Dental Traumatology4 (1987): 187-191.
  15. Ng YL., et al. “Tooth Survival Following Non-Surgical Root Canal Treatment: A Systematic Review of the Literature”. International Endodontic Journal3 (2010): 171-189.
  16. Corrêa Gislene., et al. “Influence of Remaining Coronal Thickness and Height on Biomechanical Behavior of Endodontically Treated Teeth: Survival Rates, Load to Fracture and Finite Element Analysis”. Journal of Applied Oral Science 26 (2018).
  17. Olcay Keziban., et al. “Evaluation of Related Factors in the Failure of Endodontically Treated Teeth: A Cross-Sectional Study”. Journal of Endodontics1 (2018): 38-45.
  18. Landys Borén., et al. “Long-Term Survival of Endodontically Treated Teeth At a public Dental Specialist Clinic”. Journal of Endodontics2 (2015): 176-181.
  19. Davis Matthew C and Suhaila S. Shariff. “Success and Survival of Endodontically Treated Cracked Teeth with Radicular Extensions: A 2- to 4-Year Prospective Cohort”. Journal of Endodontics7 (2019): 848-855.
  20. Khalighinejad Navid., et al. “The Influence of Periodontal Status on Endodontically Treated Teeth: 9-Year Survival Analysis”. Journal of Endodontics11 (2017): 1781-1785.

Thuraya Abdul Rahim Basudan., et al. “Restoration of Endodontically Treated Teeth”.”. EC Dental Science 19.2 (2020): 01-04.

ECronicon Journal

Our Services

Quick Links

Information

Creative Commons LicenseOpen Access by ECronicon is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
Based on a work at www.ecronicon.net