Case Report Volume 25 Issue 7 - 2026

Removal of Garbaccio-Type Implants Using a Conventional Locking Plier: A Clinical Case Report

Mateus Oliveira1, Fabiano Capato de Brito2 and Ricardo de Oliveira Silva3*

1Undergraduate Student in Dentistry, Universidade São Francisco (USF), Brazil
2DDS, Specialist in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery; Specialist and MSc in Implant Dentistry; PhD in Pharmacology (UNICAMP); Coordinator of Implant Dentistry Specialization Courses, São Leopoldo Mandic, Brazil
3DDS, PhD in Oral Biology (UNICAMP); MSc in Implant Dentistry (São Leopoldo Mandic); Specialist in Implant Dentistry (UNIFAL), Brazil

*Corresponding Author: Ricardo de Oliveira Silva, DDS, PhD in Oral Biology (UNICAMP); MSc in Implant Dentistry (São Leopoldo Man- dic); Specialist in Implant Dentistry (UNIFAL), Brazil.
Received: April 09, 2026;; Published: July 06, 2026



Objective: To describe a simplified, low-cost, and clinically applicable technique for removing Garbaccio-type implants using a conventional locking plier associated with cervical bone reduction.

Case Report: An 80-year-old female patient presented for full oral rehabilitation. Clinical and radiographic examination revealed multiple outdated Garbaccio-type implants placed over 30 years ago, as well as a conventional implant in the region of tooth 23.

Implant removal was indicated to allow optimal positioning of new osseointegrated implants. The proposed technique consisted of cervical bone reduction followed by mechanical engagement using a locking plier, enabling reverse torque application (retriever-like effect).

Four mandibular implants were successfully removed. The maxillary implant fractured at the apical portion, preventing complete removal. The conventional implant showed failure of the reverse torque retriever, which fractured inside the implant. The locking plier technique was subsequently applied successfully.

Results: The technique enabled effective implant removal with minimal bone loss and allowed predictable placement of new implants and prosthetic rehabilitation.

Conclusion: The proposed method represents a viable, accessible, and effective alternative for removing obsolete implant systems and conventional implants with fractured retrieval devices.

Keywords: Dental Implants; Implant Removal; Garbaccio; Oral Rehabilitation; Implant Dentistry

  1. Brånemark PI., et al. “Osseointegrated implants in the treatment of the edentulous jaw. Experience from a 10 year period”. Scandinavian Journal of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery 16 (1977): 1-132.
  2. Garbaccio L. “Clinical evaluation of implant removal techniques”. Minerva Stomatologica 4 (1986): 267-273.
  3. Silva RO., et al. “Removal of osseointegrated dental implants: clinical and radiographic analysis”. Journal of Oral Implantology 3 (2016): 234-240.
  4. D’Ercole S., et al. “Bacterial colonization of the implant-abutment interface in peri-implant disease”. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants 4 (2016): e1-e8.
  5. Roy M., et al. “Biomechanical factors affecting implant longevity and failure”. Clinical Oral Implants Research 20 (2020): 12-25.
  6. Solderer A., et al. “Evidence-based management of peri-implantitis: a systematic review”. Journal of Clinical Periodontology 21 (2019): 158-171.
  7. Anitua E., et al. “Removal of osseointegrated dental implants using a novel reverse torque technique”. Clinical Oral Implants Research 6 (2020): 533-540.
  8. Stajčić Z., et al. “Removal of dental implants: review of five different techniques”. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery 5 (2016): 641-648.
  9. Anitua E and Orive G. “Short implants in maxillae and mandibles: a retrospective study with 1 to 8 years of follow-up”. Journal of Periodontology 6 (2010): 819-826.
  10. Guerrero ME., et al. “Preoperative planning of implant removal using CBCT imaging”. Clinical Oral Investigations 3 (2019): 1245-1253.
  11. Aparicio C., et al. “Immediate/early loading of dental implants: a report from the Sociedad Española de Implantes”. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants 2 (2006): 255-265.
  12. Cheng FC., et al. “Digital planning in implant dentistry: current applications and future perspectives”. Journal of Dental Sciences 2 (2023): 345-352.
  13. Gooty JR., et al. “Non-surgical retrieval of failed dental implants”. Journal of International Oral Health 3 (2014): 114-118.
  14. Satwalekar P., et al. “Clinical evaluation of implant removal methods: a review”. Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research 12 (2013): 2922-2926.
  15. Tafuri G., et al. “Minimally invasive techniques for implant removal: a systematic review”. Materials (Basel)5 (2023): 1-15.
  16. Masaki C., et al. “Advances in implant removal and site preservation techniques”. Journal of Prosthodontic Research 1 (2024): 45-52.
  17. Nayana P., et al. “Management of failed dental implants and retreatment strategies”. Journal of Oral Biology and Craniofacial Research 4 (2022): 589-594.
  18. Köseoğlu PK., et al. “Peri-implantitis and implant failure: risk factors and treatment approaches”. Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research1 (2024): 102-115.

Ricardo de Oliveira Silva., et al. “Removal of Garbaccio-Type Implants Using a Conventional Locking Plier: A Clinical Case Report”. EC Dental Science 25.7 (2026): 01-07.