EC Dental Science

This review evaluates the effectiveness of pulpotomy as an alternative to traditional RCT for managing irreversible pulpitis in mature teeth. The studies analyzed collectively demonstrate that full pulpotomy achieves success rates comparable to RCT, with reported figures indicating high clinical efficacy. Additionally, pulpotomy not only alleviates pain significantly but also reduces treatment duration, which contributes to enhanced patient satisfaction and overall quality of life.

Moreover, the cost-effectiveness of pulpotomy varies according to different willingness-to-pay thresholds, making it particularly beneficial in resource-limited settings. For instance, findings reveal that pulpotomy generally results in lower overall costs compared to RCT, further emphasizing its practicality for both patients and healthcare systems.

The evidence supports the integration of full pulpotomy into clinical practice as a preferred approach for treating irreversible pulpitis. This less invasive technique not only meets the clinical needs of patients but also aligns with current trends in dentistry that favor minimally invasive procedures. By adopting full pulpotomy, dental professionals can potentially enhance patient outcomes and satisfaction while also transforming conventional practices in endodontics.

In conclusion, the findings of this review advocate for the broader adoption of full pulpotomy in dental practice as a viable, effective, and economical treatment option for irreversible pulpitis. As dental professionals continue to seek strategies that improve patient care, full pulpotomy emerges as a promising alternative that not only fulfills clinical objectives but also enhances the overall patient experience. Future research should focus on long-term outcomes associated with pulpotomy to further validate its efficacy and support its integration into standard dental protocols.

 Keywords: Pulpotomy, Root Canal Treatment (RCT); Irreversible Pulpitis; Cost-Effectiveness; Efficacy

1. Dou L., et al. “The prevalence of dental anxiety and its association with pain and other variables among adult patients with irreversible pulpitis”. BMC Oral Health1 (2018): 101.
2. Owatz CB., et al. “The incidence of mechanical allodynia in patients with irreversible pulpitis”. Journal of Endodontics5 (2007): 552-556.
3. Cushley S., et al. “Pulpotomy for mature carious teeth with symptoms of irreversible pulpitis: A systematic review”. Journal of Dentistry 88 (2019): 103158.
4. Nurul Husniyah Binti CHE SOH., et al. “Prevalence of irreversible pulpitis among male and female children - a retrospective study”. Journal of Contemporary Issues in Business and Government2 (2021).
5. Iaculli F., et al. “Vital pulp therapy of permanent teeth with reversible or irreversible pulpitis: an overview of the literature”. Journal of Clinical Medicine14 (2022): 4016.
6. Ricucci D., et al. “Vital pulp therapy: histopathology and histobacteriology-based guidelines to treat teeth with deep caries and pulp exposure”. Journal of Dentistry 86 (2019): 41-52.
7. Zanini M., et al. “Pulp inflammation diagnosis from clinical to inflammatory mediators: a systematic review”. Journal of Endodontics7 (2017): 1033-1051.
8. Dou L., et al. “The effectiveness of an additional lingual infiltration in the pulpal anesthesia of mandibular teeth: a systematic review”. Quintessence International 5 (2013): 457-464.
9. Ranly DM. “Pulpotomy therapy in primary teeth: new modalities for old rationales”. Pediatric Dentistry 6 (1994): 403-409.
10. Igna A. “Vital pulp therapy in primary dentition: pulpotomy-a 100-year challenge”. Children (Basel) 8 (2021): 841.
11. Surana P., et al. “Recent advances in pulpotomy medicament”. International Journal of Medical and Oral Research 6 (2021).
12. Al-Dlaigan YH. “Pulpotomy medicaments used in deciduous dentition: an update”. Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice 6 (2015): 486-503.
13. El-Meligy O., et al. “Histological evaluation of electrosurgery and formocresol pulpotomy techniques in primary teeth in dogs”. Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry 1 (2001): 81-85.
14. Sonmez D., et al. “A comparison of four pulpotomy techniques in primary molars: a long-term follow-up”. Journal of Endodontics 8 (2008): 950-955.
15. Ansari G., et al. “Evaluation of four pulpotomy techniques in primary molars: A randomized controlled trial”. Iranian Endodontic Journal 1 (2018): 7-12.
16. Zanini M., et al. “A review of criteria for the evaluation of pulpotomy outcomes in mature permanent teeth”. Journal of Endodontics8 (2016): 1167-1174.
17. Ather A., et al. “Outcome of pulpotomy in permanent teeth with irreversible pulpitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis”. Scientific Reports1 (2022): 19664.
18. Zhang M., et al. “Factors affecting the outcome of full pulpotomy in permanent posterior teeth diagnosed with reversible or irreversible pulpitis”. Scientific Reports 12 (2022): 20280.
19. Taha NA and Abdulkhader SZ. “Full pulpotomy with biodentine in symptomatic young permanent teeth with carious exposure”. Journal of Endodontics6 (2018): 932-937.
20. Qudeimat MA., et al. “Mineral trioxide aggregate pulpotomy for permanent molars with clinical signs indicative of irreversible pulpitis: a preliminary study”. International Endodontic Journal 2 (2017): 126-134.
21. Asgary S., et al. “Long-term outcomes of pulpotomy in permanent teeth with irreversible pulpitis: A multi-center randomized controlled trial”. American Journal of Dentistry 3 (2017): 151-155.
22. Kumar V., et al. “Comparative evaluation of platelet-rich fibrin, mineral trioxide aggregate, and calcium hydroxide as pulpotomy agents in permanent molars with irreversible pulpitis: A randomized controlled trial”. Contemporary Clinical Dentistry 4 (2016): 512-518.
23. Nosrat A., et al. “Pulpotomy in caries-exposed immature permanent molars using calcium-enriched mixture cement or mineral trioxide aggregate: a randomized clinical trial”. International Journal of Paediatric Dentistry 1 (2013): 56-63.
24. Linsuwanont P., et al. “Treatment outcomes of mineral trioxide aggregate pulpotomy in vital permanent teeth with carious pulp exposure: the retrospective study”. Journal of Endodontics 2 (2017): 225-230.
25. Lin P-Y., et al. “Primary molar pulpotomy: A systematic review and network meta-analysis”. Journal of Dentistry9 (2014): 1060-1077.
26. Fuks AB. “Vital pulp therapy with new materials for primary teeth: new directions and treatment perspectives”. Pediatric Dentistry 30 (2008): 211-219.
27. Philip N and Suneja B. “Minimally invasive endodontics: a new era for pulpotomy in mature permanent teeth”. British Dental Journal12 (2022): 1035-1041.
28. Mustafa M., et al. “Assessment of the root and canal morphology in the permanent dentition of Saudi Arabian population using cone beam computed and micro-computed tomography - a systematic review”. BMC Oral Health1 (2024): 343.
29. Carrotte PV. “Current practice in endodontics”. Dental Update 7 (2000): 338-340.
30. Unal GC., et al. “Survey of attitudes, materials and methods preferred in root canal therapy by general dental practice in Turkey: Part 1”. European Journal of Dentistry 4 (2012): 376-384.
31. Estrela C., et al. “Characterization of successful root canal treatment”. Brazilian Dental Journal 1 (2014): 3-11.
32. Segura-Egea JJ., et al. “Pain associated with root canal treatment”. International Endodontic Journal7 (2009): 614-620.
33. Meechan JG. “Supplementary routes to local anaesthesia”. International Endodontic Journal11 (2002): 885-896.
34. Jeske AH. “Local anesthetics: special considerations in endodontics”. Journal of the Tennessee Dental Association 3 (2003): 231-237.
35. Asgary S., et al. “Outcomes of root canal therapy or full pulpotomy using two endodontic biomaterials in mature permanent teeth: a randomized controlled trial”. Clinical Oral Investigations3 (2022): 3287-3297.
36. Zhu L., et al. “Full pulpotomy versus root canal therapy in mature teeth with irreversible pulpitis: a randomized controlled trial”. BMC Oral Health1 (2024): 1231.
37. Asgary S and Eghbal MJ. “A clinical trial of pulpotomy vs. root canal therapy of mature molars”. Journal of Dental Research10 (2010): 1080-1085.
38. Beauquis J., et al. “Short-term pain evolution and treatment success of pulpotomy as irreversible pulpitis permanent treatment: a non-randomized clinical study”. Journal of Clinical Medicine3 (2022): 787.
39. Taha NA., et al. “A randomized controlled clinical trial of pulpotomy versus root canal therapy in mature teeth with irreversible pulpitis: outcome, quality of life, and patients’ satisfaction”. Journal of Endodontics6 (2023): 624-31.e2.
40. Naved N., et al. “Irreversible pulpitis in mature permanent teeth: a cost-effectiveness analysis of pulpotomy versus root canal treatment”. BMC Oral Health1 (2024): 285.