EC Dental Science

Case Report Volume 23 Issue 5 - 2024

Prosthodontic Management of Dental Implants in Severely Proclined Anterior Maxilla

Abdulkader Aljarrah1*, Reem Fahad Al Obud2 and Albaraa Swaid3

1Consultant Prosthodontics, King Abdulaziz Medical City, National Guard Health Affairs, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
2Prosthodontics Resident King Abdulaziz Medical City, National Guard Health Affairs, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
3Consultant Periodontics, King Abdulaziz Medical City, National Guard Health Affairs, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia

*Corresponding Author: Abdulkader Aljarrah, Consultant Prosthodontics, King Abdulaziz Medical City, National Guard Health Affairs, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Received: April 04, 2024; Published: May 02, 2024



The treatment modalities for missing anterior teeth are fixed dental prosthesis, removable ‎dental prosthesis, or dental implant. The treatment of choice is dental implant. The esthetic ‎and functional result are more predictable and desirable by the patients. The choice of ‎retaining the prosthesis to the implant are by cement or screw. The selection should be ‎made based on the knowledge of the advantages and disadvantages of each type. For ‎example, screw retained implant prosthesis has the advantages of being retrievable, and the ‎risk of potentially retained subgingival cement is eliminated. On the other hand, in cases of ‎angulated implant or anterior implants the screw hole might be placed facial which will ‎interfere with the esthetic outcome. Therefore, in some cases cement retained implant ‎prosthesis can be used. This case report presents the treatment of a patient with missing ‎three maxillary anterior teeth using dental implant.‎

 Keywords: Cement Retained Implant Prosthesis; Dental Implants; Implant Prosthesis; Screw Retained Implant Prosthesis

  1. Krennmair Gerald., et al. "Implant-prosthodontic rehabilitation of anterior partial edentulism: ‎a clinical review”. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants5 (2011): 1043-1050.
  2. Avila-Ortiz G., et al. "Effect of alveolar ridge preservation after tooth extraction: a ‎systematic review and meta-analysis”. Journal of Dental Research10 (2014): 950-958. ‎
  3. Araújo Mauricio G and Jan Lindhe. "Dimensional ridge alterations following tooth ‎ An experimental study in the dog”. Journal of Clinical Periodontology ‎‎32.2 (2005): 212-218.
  4. Tan Wah Lay., et al. "A systematic review of post‐extractional alveolar hard and soft ‎tissue dimensional changes in humans”. Clinical Oral Implants Research5 (2012): 1-‎‎21.
  5. Fürhauser R., et al. ‎"Bucco‐palatal implant position and its impact on soft tissue level in the maxillary esthetic ‎zone”. Clinical Oral Implants Research11 (2022): 1125-1134.
  6. Singhal Mukesh Kumar., et al. "Implant placement into the nasopalatine foramen: ‎Considerations from anatomical and surgical point of view”. Annals of Maxillofacial Surgery2 (2018): 347-‎‎351.
  7. Waasdorp Jonathan. "Enucleation of the incisive canal for implant placement: a comprehensive literature review and case report”. Journal of Oral Implantology2 (2016): 180-183.
  8. ‎McCrea Shane Joseph. "Nasopalatine duct cyst, a delayed complication to successful dental implant placement: diagnosis and surgical management”. Journal of Oral Implantology2 (2014): 189-195.
  9. Takeshita Kenji., et al. "Nasopalatine duct cyst developed in association with dental implant treatment: A case report and histopathological observation”. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology2 (2013): 319.
  10. Ma Sunyoung and Aaron Fenton. "Screw-versus cement-retained implant prostheses: a systematic review of prosthodontic maintenance and complications”. International Journal of Prosthodontics2 (2015): 127-145.
  11. Nematollahi Fatemeh., et al. "Cement selection for cement‐retained implant‐supported prostheses: A literature review”. Journal of Prosthodontics7 (2016): 599-606.

Abdulkader Aljarrah., et al., “Prosthodontic Management of Dental Implants in Severely Proclined Anterior Maxilla”.”. EC Dental Science 23.5 (2024): 01-04.