EC Dental Science

Mini Review Volume 22 Issue 4 - 2023

Presumptive Indicators of Oral Biofilm Formation: A Selective Approach

Rajesh Sawhney1* and Archit Sawhney2

1Professor and Head, Department of Microbiology, National Dental College and Hospital, Punjab, India
2Chandigarh College of Pharmacy, Punjab, India

*Corresponding Author: Rajesh Sawhney, Professor and Head, Department of Microbiology, National Dental College and Hospital, Punjab, India.
Received: March 10, 2023; Published: March 16, 2023



Biofilms have been studied using various diagnostic tools and techniques such as Microtitre plate method, bright field microscopy, epifluorescence microscopy, scanning electron microscopy etc. These advanced techniques are costly and have limited access. The present text highlights some important presumptive indicators of biofilm formation in the host body, and further need to explore such indicators.

Keywords: Oral Biofilm Formation; Microtitre Plate Method; Bright Field Microscopy; Epifluorescence Microscopy; Scanning Electron Microscopy

  1. Illingworth BL., et al. “In vivo efficacy of silver-coated (silzone) infection-resistant polyester fabric against a biofilm-producing bacteria, Staphylococcus epidermidis”. The Journal of Heart Valve Disease 7 (1998): 524-530.
  2. Taylor RJ. “Efficacy of industrial biocides against bacterial biofilms”. Ph.D. thesis. University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom (1996).
  3. Angell P., et al. “On line, non-destructive biomass determination of bacterial biofilms by fluorometry”. The Journal of Microbiological Methods 18 (1993): 317-327.
  4. Jacobs L., et al. “Spectrophotometric monitoring of biofouling”. Water Science and Technology 34 (1996): 533-540.
  5. Mittelman MW., et al. “Multipurpose laminar-flow adhesion cells for the study of bacterial colonization and biofilm formation”. Biofouling 6 (1992): 39-51.
  6. Rioufol C., et al. “Quantitative determination of endotoxins released by bacterial biofilms”. Journal of Hospital Infection 43 (1999): 203-209.
  7. Grigorova R and Norris JR. “Methods in microbiology”. London Academic Press Inc 22 (2005): 251-285.
  8. Mills DK., et al. “Assessing microbial community diversity using amplicon length heterogeneity polymerase chain reaction”. Soil Science 71 (2007): 572-578.
  9. Ascenzioni F., et al. “Editorial: Microbial Biofilms in Chronic and Recurrent Infections”. Frontiers in Microbiology 12 (2021): 803324.
  10. Singh PK., et al. “Quorum-sensing signals indicate that cystic fibrosis lungs are infected with bacterial biofilms”. Nature 407 (2000): 762-764.
  11. Römling U and Balsalobre C. “Biofilm infections, their resilience to therapy and innovative treatment strategies”. Journal of Internal Medicine 272 (2012): 541-561.
  12. Macià MD., et al. “Antimicrobial susceptibility testing in biofilm-growing bacteria”. Clinical Microbiology and Infection 20 (2014): 981-990.
  13. Di Domenico EG., et al. “Microbial biofilm correlates with an increased antibiotic tolerance and poor therapeutic outcome in infective endocarditis”. BMC Microbiology 19 (2019): 228.
  14. Characklis WG., et al. “Physiological ecology in biofilm systems”. In W. G. Characklis and K. C. Marshall (edition.), Biofilms. John Wiley and Sons, New York, N.Y (1990): 341-394.

Rajesh Sawhney and Archit Sawhney. “Presumptive Indicators of Oral Biofilm Formation: A Selective Approach”.”. EC Dental Science 22.4 (2023): 94-96.