EC Dental Science

Dr. Branemark and his colleagues pioneered the idea of osseointegration, which completely changed the landscape of oral rehabilitation by replacing missing teeth and significantly advancing restorative dentistry. In the last two decades, there has been a significant increase in the adoption of implant treatment within the realm of general dental practice. Presently, the efficacy of implant procedure is contigent upon more than just osseointegration; it also relies on achieving satisfactory aesthetic outcomes. Consequently, recent studies on implantology have shifted towards assessing aesthetic factors. Modern dentistry aims to prioritize esthetic outcome as a key component of dental treatment. In recent years, there has been a greater focus on enhancing esthetic parameters. When assessing the triumph of implant-supported prosthetics, it is crucial that crown harmonize morphologically with the existing natural dentition. Achieving optimal aesthetic outcome requires a thorough understanding of smile design principles, tissue management and implant placement techniques.

The peri-implant mucosa, or soft tissue around dental implants, is vital for maintaining the aesthetic integrity. Proper management of soft tissue contours and colour matching between prosthetic material and natural teeth are key factors to consider. Furthermore, advancements have led to development of biomimetic implant surfaces that enhance osseointegration and promote soft tissue adherence and stability.

These developments highlights the collaborative nature of modern implantology, where teamwork between prosthodontists, periodontists and dental technicians are essential for achieving consistent and aesthetically pleasing results.

 Keywords: Osseointegration; Restorative Dentistry; Implant Dentistry

1. Mangano FG., et al. “Aesthetic outcome of immediately restored single implants placed in extraction sockets and healed sites of the anterior maxilla: a retrospective study on 103 patients with 3 years of follow-up”. Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research 2 (2017): 233-242.
2. Belser UC., et al. “Outcome evaluation of early placed maxillary anterior single-tooth implants using objective esthetic criteria: a cross-sectional, retrospective study in 45 patients with a 2- to 4-year follow-up using pink and white esthetic scores”. Journal of Periodontology 1 (2009): 140-151.
3. Chen ST and Buser D. “Esthetic outcomes following immediate and early implant placement in the anterior maxilla - a systematic review”. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants 29 (2014): 186-215.
4. Schropp L and Isidor F. “Timing of implant placement relative to tooth extraction: a systematic review”. Journal of Oral Rehabilitation 1 (2008): 33-43.
5. Jung RE., et al. “Systematic review of the survival rate and the incidence of biological, technical, and aesthetic complications of single crowns on implants reported in longitudinal studies with a mean follow-up of 5 years”. Clinical Oral Implants Research 6 (2012): 2-21.
6. Buser D., et al. “Prosthetic management of esthetics around implants”. Quintessence Publishing Co. Inc., (1995).
7. Seibert JS. "Ridge augmentation: the classic technique". Journal of Periodontology 4 (1991): 272-278.
8. Buser D., et al. “Implant placement post extraction in esthetic single tooth sites: when immediate, when early, when late?” Periodontology 20001 (2017): 84-102.
9. Esquivel-Upshaw JF., et al. “A clinical study evaluating the recall and effectiveness of CEREC CAD/CAM crowns”. Journal of Prosthodontics3 (2015): 194-200.
10. Tarnow DP., et al. “Flapless postextraction socket implant placement in the esthetic zone: part 1. The effect of bone grafting and/or provisional restoration on facial-palatal ridge dimensional change-a retrospective cohort study”. International Journal of Periodontics and Restorative Dentistry4 (2012): 345-355.
11. Buser D., et al. “Safety of early implant placement with simultaneous hard and soft tissue augmentation”. Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research6 (2019): 1092-1100.
12. Thoma DS., et al. “Efficacy of soft tissue augmentation around dental implants and in partially edentulous areas: a systematic review”. Journal of Clinical PeriodontologyS22 (2020): 196-219.
13. Tan WL., et al. “A systematic review of post-extractional alveolar hard and soft tissue dimensional changes in humans”. Clinical Oral Implants ResearchS5 (2012): 1-21.
14. Sanz-Martin I., et al. “Platform-switching and soft tissue thickness: preliminary results of a prospective cohort study”. International Journal of Periodontics and Restorative Dentistry3 (2019): 373-381.
15. Coachman C., et al. “Influence of tooth and implant positional relationships on esthetics in implant dentistry”. In H. Chronopoulos & G. Zarb (Eds.), Clinical Periodontology and Implant Dentistry (6^th edition) Wiley-Blackwell (2018): 667-678.
16. Van Assche N., et al. “Accuracy of implant placement based on pre-surgical planning of three-dimensional cone-beam images: a pilot study”. Journal of Clinical Periodontology4 (2012): 385-393.
17. Kan JY., et al. “Immediate placement and provisionalization of maxillary anterior single implants: 1-year prospective study”. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants4 (2019): 985-993.
18. Smith JA and Brown LR. “Advances in soft tissue management around dental implants”. Journal of Implant Dentistry 4 (2023): 345-356.
19. Johnson MT and Lee HK. “Color matching and aesthetic outcomes in implant dentistry”. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants1 (2022): 78-85.
20. Garcia PR and Kim JS. “Integrated approaches for aesthetic success in implant dentistry”. Clinical Oral Implants Research5 (2021): 567-575.