EC Dental Science

Review Article Volume 20 Issue 11 - 2021

External Cervical Resorption

Mohammed Hani Ahmed1*, Dua’a Matooq Alyahya2, Dalal Abdulaziz Alnafisah2, Fatimah Hassan Almubarak2, Majid Mohammed Asiri2, Rawan Mohammed Alrabie3, Amjad Selmi Alrehaili3, Abdarhman Mohamad Alshangiti3, Ahmed Saeed Alharthi4, Zahraa Ali Sultan Alali5, Abdulrahamn Salem Alfarha6, Abdullah Dhafer Alshahrani7, Arafa Ali AlMahroos8, Noor Jomah Allowaim9 and Bushra Ali Alqahtani10

1Cairo University, Egypt
2Ministry of Health, Saudi Arabia
3Taibah University Dental College, Saudi Arabia
4Al Noor Specialist Hospital, Saudi Arabia
5Alfarabi College, Saudi Arabia
6King Abdulaziz University, Saudi Arabia
7Ministry of Interior, Saudi Arabia
8Jordan University of Science and Technology, Jordan
9Almashfai Hospital, Saudi Arabia
10Armed Forces Hospital, Saudi Arabia

*Corresponding Author: Mohammed Hani Ahmed, Professor of Restorative Dentistry, Registered in Saudi Commission for Health specialties as Consultant and Cairo University, Egypt. Number: 05JD0323. E-mail: abdelghanymohamedhany@gmail.com
Received: October 09, 2021; Published: October 28, 2021



Introduction: Invasive cervical resorption of a tooth leads to loss of the mineralized tooth structure and replacement of the natural tooth structure by inflammatory and granulation tissue. The target area for tooth loss in the case of Cervical resorption is the precementum layers due to their unmineralized characteristic. The precementum layer is resorbed and replaced by odontoclastic cells.

Aim of the Study: This review aims at describing the various aspects of External Cervical resorption, understanding the etiology, and reviewing various restorative materials used for the management of such lesions.

Methodology: This review is a comprehensive research of PUBMED and Google Scholar from the years 1989 to 2020.

Conclusion: External Cervical Resorption is an aggressive disease in which the unmineralized dentin layer is replaced by granulation tissue, the etiology of this disease is multifactorial and is a result of various dental treatments like orthodontics, bleaching, periodontal therapies, etc. CBCT gives a better picture of the extent of resorption, which makes it easier to decide the treatment approach. Various Calcium silicate cement has been used for restoring resorptive lesions as they help in regenerating the lost cementum. Biodentine is widely popular as the restorative choice due to its increased biochemical properties. The need of the hour is to understand the etiology of the lesion better and test various calcium silicate-based cement for a better prognosis of teeth with External cervical lesion.

Keywords: External Cervical Resorption; Odontoclastoma; Osteoclasts; Biodentine; Calcium Silicate-Based Cement

  1. Patel S and Ford TP. “Is the resorption external or internal?” Dental Update4 (2007): 218-229.
  2. Heithersay GS. “Clinical, radiologic, and histopathologic features of invasive cervical resorption”. Quintessence International1 (1999).
  3. Heithersay G S. “Invasive cervical resorption”. Endodontic Topics1 (2004): 73-92.
  4. Rotondi O., et al. “The Disease Process, Diagnosis and Treatment of Invasive Cervical Resorption: A Review”. Dentistry Journal3 (2020): 64.
  5. Mavridou A M., et al. “Understanding external cervical resorption patterns in endodontically treated teeth”. International Endodontic Journal12 (2017): 1116-1133.
  6. Neuvald L and Consolaro A. “Cementoenamel junction: microscopic analysis and external cervical resorption”. Journal of Endodontics9 (2000): 503-508.
  7. Heithersay GS. “Invasive cervical resorption: an analysis of potential predisposing factors”. Quintessence International2 (1999).
  8. Linkous E R., et al. “External apical root resorption and vectors of orthodontic tooth movement”. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics5 (2020): 700-709.
  9. Han G., et al. “Root resorption after orthodontic intrusion and extrusion: an intraindividual study”. The Angle Orthodontist6 (2005): 912-918.
  10. Malikaew P., et al. “Prevalence and factors associated with traumatic dental injuries (TDI) to anterior teeth of 11-13 year old Thai children”. Community Dental Health4 (2006): 222-227.
  11. Trope M. “Root resorption due to dental trauma”. Endodontic topics1 (2002): 79-100.
  12. Andreasen J O., et al. “Textbook and color atlas of traumatic injuries to the teeth”. John Wiley and Sons (2018).
  13. Newton R and Hayes J. “The association of external cervical resorption with modern internal bleaching protocols: what is the current evidence?” British Dental Journal5 (2020): 333-337.
  14. Lim KC. “Considerations in intracoronal bleaching”. Australian Endodontic Journal2 (2004): 69-73.
  15. Chng HK. “Update on materials used in intracoronal bleaching”. Annals of the Royal Australasian College of Dental Surgeons 16 (2002): 147-150.
  16. Moskow BS. “Periodontal manifestations of hyperoxaluria and oxalosis”. Journal of Periodontology5 (1989): 271-278.
  17. Irinakis E., et al. “External cervical resorption: a retrospective case-control study”. Journal of Endodontics10 (2020): 1420-1427.
  18. Llena-Puy M C., et al. “Idiopathic external root resorption associated to hypercalciuria”. Medicina Oral: Organo Oficial de la Sociedad Espanola de Medicina Oral y de la Academia Iberoamericana de Patologia y Medicina Bucal3 (2002): 192-199.
  19. Gunst V., et al. “External cervical resorption: an analysis using cone beam and microfocus computed tomography and scanning electron microscopy”. International Endodontic Journal9 (2013): 877-887.
  20. Patel S., et al. “External cervical resorption: a review”. Journal of Endodontics5 (2009): 616-625.
  21. Schröder ÂGD., et al. “Accuracy of digital periapical radiography and cone-beam computed tomography for diagnosis of natural and simulated external root resorption”. Journal of Endodontics7 (2018): 1151-1158.
  22. Patel S., et al. “The potential applications of cone beam computed tomography in the management of endodontic problems”. International Endodontic Journal10 (2007): 818-830.
  23. Karunakar P., et al. “Endodontic management of invasive cervical resorption: Report of two cases”. Journal of Conservative Dentistry: JCD5 (2018): 578.
  24. Heithersay GS. “Treatment of invasive cervical resorption: An analysis of results using topical application of trichioracetic acid, curettage, and restoration”. Quintessence International2 (1999).
  25. Karypidou A., et al. “Management of bilateral invasive cervical resorption lesions in maxillary incisors using a novel calcium silicatebased cement: A case report”. Quintessence International8 (2016).
  26. Aggarwal V., et al. “Comparative evaluation of push-out bond strength of ProRoot MTA, Biodentine, and MTA Plus in furcation perforation repair”. Journal of Conservative Dentistry: JCD5 (2013): 462.
  27. Vallés M., et al. “Color stability of teeth restored with Biodentine: a 6-month in vitro study”. Journal of Endodontics7 (2015): 1157- 1160.
  28. Shemesh A., et al. “Minimally invasive treatment of class 4 invasive cervical resorption with internal approach: a case series”. Journal of Endodontics11 (2017): 1901-1908.
  29. Asgary S., et al. “Vital pulp therapy as a conservative approach for management of invasive cervical root resorption: A case series”. Journal of Endodontics9 (2019): 1161-1167.

Mohammed Hani Ahmed., et al. “External Cervical Resorption”.”. EC Dental Science 20.11 (2021): 140-146.