EC Dental Science

Mini Review Volume 22 Issue 4 - 2023

Comparison Between Cortical and Conventional Implants: Review

Siddharth Sankar Panigrahy1, Shivanand Barik1, Nagaveni S Somayaji2, Namrata Mishra3 and Naina Pattnaik4*

1Intern, Hi-Tech Dental College and Hospital, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India
2Associate Professor, Department of Prosthodontics and Crown and Bridges, Hi-Tech Dental College and Hospital, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India
3Assistant Professor, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Medicine and Radiology, Hi-Tech Dental College and Hospital, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India
4HOD in Charge and Associate Professor; Department of Periodontics, Hi-Tech Dental College and Hospital, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India

*Corresponding Author: Naina Pattnaik, HOD in Charge and Associate Professor; Department of Periodontics, Hi-Tech Dental College and Hospital, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India.
Received: February 03, 2023; Published: March 16, 2023



Implantology is the highly advanced, acceptable procedure with extremely satisfactory results in health, function and aesthetics. The conventional implant system though widely used, but the basal implants are the modern system of implantology. This utilizes the basal cortical portion of the jaw bones and provides an excellent quality of retention. The cortical implant system is very useful in cases of severely atrophied ridges and medically compromised patients. These implants can not only placed immediately but also loaded immediately. In this implant system, the implant and the abutment are fused to a single piece which minimizes the failure unlike the conventional system.

Keywords: Basal Implants; Conventional Implants; Cortical Bone; Retention

  1. Yadav RS., et al. “An Alternative to Conventional Dental Implants: Basal Implants”. Rama University Journal of Dental Sciences 2 (2015): 22-28.
  2. Scortecci G., et al. “Implants and Restorative Dentistry”. Martin Dunitz, London (2001): 79-85.
  3. Shakhawan MA., et al. “All-on-Four Treatment Concept in Dental Implants: A Review Articles”. Surgery and Case Studies: Open Access Journal4 (2019): 175-179.
  4. Neamat AH., et al. “An Indirect Sinus Floor Elevation by Using Piezoelectric Surgery with Platelet-Rich Fibrin for Sinus Augmentation: A Short Surgical Practice”. International Journal of Case Reports 8 (2017): 380-384.
  5. Misch CE., et al. “Mechanical Properties of Trabecular Bone in the Human Mandible. Implications of Dental Implant Planning and Surgical Placement”. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery6 (1999): 700-706.
  6. Misch CE. “Contemporary Implant Dentistry”. Mosby Elsevier, St Louis (2008): 1034-1035.
  7. , et al. “Rehabilitation of Severely Atrofic Jaws Using Basal Disk Implants”. Journal of Oral Implantology 38.5 (2012): 611-616.
  8. Shahed SSA., et al. “Basal Implants: A Breakthrough for Atrophic Ridges: Review”. Journal of Applied Dental and Medical Sciences1 (2018): 2454-2288.
  9. Gupta AD., et al. “Basal Osseointegrated Implants: Classification and Review”. International Journal of Contemporary Medical Research11 (2017): 2329-2335.
  10. Rathee M., et al. “Basal implants: an alternative treatment modality for geriatric patients- a case report”. Journal of the West Bengal University of Health Sciences 1 (2020): 85-89.
  11. Frost HM. “Wolff’s Law and bone’s structural adaptations to mechanical usage: An overview for clinicians”. Angle Orthodontist 3 (1994): 175-188.
  12. Tulasne JF. “Osseointegrated fixtures in the pterygoid region”. In: Worthington P, Branemark PI, editors. Advanced Osseo-Integration Surgery: Applications in the Maxillofacial Region. Chicago, Ill: Quintessence Publishing (1992): 182-188.

Naina Pattnaik., et al. “Comparison Between Cortical and Conventional Implants: Review”.”. EC Dental Science 22.4 (2023): 97-102.

ECronicon Journal

Our Services

Quick Links

Information

Creative Commons LicenseOpen Access by ECronicon is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
Based on a work at www.ecronicon.net