EC Dental Science

Research Article Volume 23 Issue 9 - 2024

Comparative Study on the Efficacy of Interdental Brush and Dental Floss in Interdental Plaque Reduction among Undergraduate Students in a Dental Institute in North Bangalore

Anagha Reji1*, Murali R2, Prabhuji MLV3, Kishore Hadal4 and Mansi Yalamali5

1Assistant Professor, Department of Public Health Dentistry, Krishnadevaraya College of Dental Science and Hospital, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India
2Professor, Department of Public Health Dentistry, Krishnadevaraya College of Dental Science and Hospital, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India
3Professor, Department of Periodontics, Krishnadevaraya College of Dental Science and Hospital, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India
4Head of Education, Curaden India
5Associate Professor, Department of Public Health Dentistry, Krishnadevaraya College of Dental Science and Hospital, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India

*Corresponding Author: Anagha Reji, Assistant Professor, Department of Public Health Dentistry, Krishnadevaraya College of Dental Science and Hospital, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.
Received: August 07, 2024; Published: September 16, 2024



Introduction: Effective oral hygiene is crucial for maintaining good oral health, impacting overall health and quality of life. Dental plaque accumulation is a primary factor for periodontal disease, characterized by an inflammatory response in gingival tissue. While brushing is the most practiced method, it is less effective for interproximal surfaces, necessitating additional interdental aids like dental floss and interdental brushes. Dental students, as future oral health professionals, are an ideal study population for assessing these methods.

Methodology: A parallel group randomized control trial was conducted among 45 dental students in North Bangalore over three months. Participants were randomly assigned to three groups: Group 1 (dental floss and manual brushing), group 2 (color-coded interdental brushes and manual brushing), and group 3 (manual brushing only, control group). Ethical clearance and informed consent were obtained. Interventions lasted five weeks, with oral prophylaxis provided before the interventions. Measurements were taken at baseline, 14 days, and 28 days using full mouth plaque score (FMPS), full mouth bleeding score (FMBS), and papillary bleeding index (PBI).

Results: The study included 45 participants, with no significant age or gender differences among groups. Significant differences in FMBS were observed at 14 and 28 days, with group 2 showing the lowest scores. PBI scores were significantly lower in group 2 at 14 and 28 days. Interdental brushes were more effective than dental floss and manual brushing alone in reducing interdental plaque and bleeding scores.

Conclusion: Interdental brushes, selected based on each patient’s specific interdental spaces using a colorimetric probe and combined with manual tooth brushing, were more effective in reducing interdental plaque and bleeding compared to dental floss or manual brushing alone. These findings underscore the importance of integrating interdental aids into daily oral hygiene routines for optimal oral health.

 Keywords: Interdental Brushes; Dental Floss; Dental Students; Colorimetric Probe; FMBS; FMPS; Papillary Bleeding Index

  1. McGrath C and Bedi R. “Population based norming of the UK oral health related quality of life measure (OHQoL-UK©)”. British Dental Journal9 (2002): 521-524.
  2. Sheiham A. “Oral health, general health and quality of life”. Bulletin of the World Health Organization9 (2005): 644-645.
  3. Graziani F., et al. “Interdental plaque reduction after use of different devices in young subjects with intact papilla: A randomized clinical trial”. International Journal of Dental Hygiene 3 (2017): 389-396.
  4. Marsh PD. “Role of the oral microflora in health”. Microbial Ecology in Health and Disease3 (2000): 130-137.
  5. Löe H. “Oral hygiene in the prevention of caries and periodontal disease”. International Dental Journal3 (2000): 129-139.
  6. Kornman KS. “Controlled-release local delivery antimicrobials in periodontics: prospects for the future”. Journal of Periodontology8s (1993): 782-791.
  7. Cumming BR and Loe H. “Consistency of plaque distribution in individuals without special home care instruction”. Journal of Periodontal Research2 (1973): 94-100.
  8. Hugoson A and Koch G. “Oral health in 1000 individuals aged 3-70 years in the community of Jönköping, Sweden A review”. Swedish Dental Journal3 (1979): 69-87.
  9. Christou V., et al. “Comparison of different approaches of interdental oral hygiene: interdental brushes versus dental floss”. Journal of Periodontology7 (1998): 759-764.
  10. Luz M., et al. “Comparison between interdental brush and dental floss for controlling interproximal biofilm in teeth and implants”. Dental Health: Current Research3 (2016).
  11. Kiger RD., et al. “A comparison of proximal plaque removal using floss and interdental brushes”. Journal of Clinical Periodontology9 (1991): 681-684.
  12. Biesbrock A., et al. “Assessment of treatment responses to dental flossing in twins”. Journal of Periodontology8 (2006): 1386-1391.
  13. Poklepovic Pericic T., et al. “Interdental brushing for the prevention and control of periodontal diseases and dental caries in adults”. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 4 (2019): CD009857.
  14. Peker I and Alkurt MT. “Oral health attitudes and behavior among a group of Turkish dental students”. European Journal of Dentistry1 (2009): 24-31.

Anagha Reji., et al. “Comparative Study on the Efficacy of Interdental Brush and Dental Floss in Interdental Plaque Reduction among Undergraduate Students in a Dental Institute in North Bangalore”.”. EC Dental Science 23.9 (2024): 01-06.